Anti-Smoking Ad Analysis

Tobacco ads have stood out to me from a young age, I was used to seeing cigarette ads in every magazine and street corner. When I was 11 I joined a tobacco advocacy group, I wanted to inform young people my age about the dangers of tobacco but mostly I joined because they paid me. I found these two ads and I remembered sitting in an empty classroom analyzing tobacco ads and discussing how they appeal to us. I found two ads, both from the most recent issue of a popular celebrity gossip magazine. The first major difference one notices is that of the ads is catered to a completely different audience. Blu E-cigarettes cater to the new age of tobacco consumers. While Newport menthol cigarettes are tried and tested, a classic. The major differences in this ad make it difficult to pick which one is most effective at getting more buyers of their product. Newport’s ad is

Advertising is a form of communication between producers and consumers attained through marketing which persuades, encourages or manipulates the consumer to be drawn to a certain good or service in order to increase recognition and promote sales. In order to successfully promote a good or a service, sellers use advertising techniques that have had to be altered and improved over time as fashion, values and standards of living change. Advertising research and marketing research works to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of advertising and the most common advertising techniques focus on appealing to their targeted audience through appropriate persuasive language and visual elements. This paper will explore the evolution

My ad for an anti smoking campaign shows a picture of a baby smoking a cigarette as half the baby 's face is decaying. To the right of this image there is text that states," I smoke second hand." Right below that in smaller text is a warning that reads, "Warning: may kill your baby." After closely analyzing this image I found that the argument for this advertisement is: Smoking not only effects you but the people around you too. This ad is very effective due the fact that the distinctive feature of the argument convinces the audience that smoking is unhealthy even second hand smoke.

First, the ad itself is black and white but shows some color on one specific part. The ad starts off by attracting the audience’s attention with bright color crayons. The crayons are meant to represent cigarettes. Then, the audience eye is caught a second time by a white colored phrase above. Which is intended to call the attention on parents who are smokers. The ad also shows a hand holding a box of Marlboros,

The first ad, shows a gun facing the audience against a black background and in the left corner it states, “Are your children safe?” The word “safe” is in larger text size. There are words on the right bottom corner declaring, “Stop gun violence.” It also provides information on the left bottom corner about their organization stating that their goal is to, “secure freedom from gun violence.” This ad is rhetorically effective because it uses certain words to express the reason why gun control shouldn't be allowed. The word “safety” has a bigger font size to emphasize the importance of safety.The word “gun” is colored in red to imply the source of violence are

Did you know that almost every one person out of seven smokes cigarettes on Earth? It is one of the top cause of death, yet, five million people die each year. Anti- smoking advertisements usually comes up very often, when you are watching TV, on social media, even on top of the cigarette packs. The advertisement that I choosed to do my rhetorical analysis is black and white picture, showing young woman smoking a cigarette and the smoke is forming like rope around the lady’s neck where it is about to choke the lady. The advertisement is using the two rhetorical claim of logos and pathos through this picture. Through this advertisement, the image shows us how deadly it is to smoke cigarettes.

The advertisement features John Wayne, the famous actor of the 1950s, in a 1950 magazine ad for Camel cigarettes. The Camel cigarette brand had become the top selling cigarette in the U.S. by the 1950s, thanks in part to the company’s dense advertising. John Wayne had been a chain smoker since young adulthood, so it was not out of his personality for him, or shocking for those times, to see him in a cigarette ad. John Wayne, by the time he appeared in the 1950 print ad at right, was at the top of his movie career. Wayne had already reached stardom in motion pictures by the early 1940s, and by the end of the decade was one of Hollywood’s top ten box office attractions. During the last half of the 1940s Wayne had played the lead in notable westerns and other films. Which explains why he was chosen for the ad?

However, in the early 2000s, scientists and health specialists all over America began publishing research journals and propaganda stating how detrimental smoking was to one's life. Coincidentally, smoking rates and death also began to go down simultaneously. This propaganda paired with scientific facts provided by various laboratories, nicknamed anti-smoking propaganda, began to immediately change the atmosphere of smokers within America. Therefore, one must wonder how the changing trend in smoking-related propaganda and the newly introduced anti-smoking propaganda has affected its American populous. This research will analyze that exactly, and come to a conclusion on how the changes in smoking-related propaganda have affected the American populous.

Puff, puff, puff . . . ummm the cool fresh taste of smoke in your lungs. Doesn't that taste good??? Well, depending to whom you talk to, a variety of answers are possible. It is interesting though, that we, as a society, actually are still deceived into believing the false promises of happiness and bliss from smoking cigarettes. In our society people still deny and forget the fact that smoking causes lung cancer and directly kills over a million people every year, and that is just what tobacco advertisement departments would like to have you forget. Nowadays, advertising has become a major part of American society today. Everywhere you go there is advertising to be seen and absorbed by the consumer

The advertisement posted on this assignment was an Anti-Smoking ad that has become viral through Thailand. In the visual you can see children approaching random pedestrians who are smoking and asking if they can participate with them. The smokers on the ad all refuse to let the child participate due to the many harms, in return the children offer a paper that ask each smoker to practice what they shared to each child. The rhetorical techniques in the ad were very evident within the realm of Pathos and Logos. The Pathos was found in the emotional convictions of each smoker that had to confront a child about their harmful habit. During the video, there was also information presented on statistics that were affected by the event of these children;

For anyone that is interested in quitting traditional tobacco smoking and trying out vaping, the 21st century smoke rechargeable kit is one of the best that you can start with. It is made from the reputable Chinese company, 21st Century Smoke. The company is majorly known for their affordable products, which is always a plus for new vapers who are just starting to explore the vaping world and are not yet ready to use a lot of money. Having been in operation for about five years now, they are certainly doing quite well, especially with their starter kit. One of their best products is the 21st century smoke rechargeable kit.

Electric cigarettes are healthier than traditional tobacco cigarettes and some even argue that people should converting to electric

     Should tobacco advertising be restricted? This is a very controversial issue. There is the idea that young children that smoke started smoking because of advertisements, but there is also the idea that children start smoking for other reasons. Many big, well-known tobacco companies like RJ Reynolds are being sued for their advertisements. On Monday April 20th, 1998 the jury heard a testimony from Lynn Beasly, the marketing vice president of the RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. The courts believed that the advertisement was directed towards children under the age of 18, due to a document from the RJ Reynolds Board of Directors showing that they set a goal to increase the company's market share among 14

Ads have existed for so long for a reason, there’s really not another alternative as effective in trying to introduce someone to a product, movement, or idea. The particular smoking ad from an organization called Health Canada created an Ad that clearly shows the negative effects of smoking cigarettes, not only that, but they also try to give aid to those who are looking to quit their detrimental habit; they carry out this goal of informing and persuading users to quit or abide from starting, by using many elements which include purpose, photo, text, and content. This Ad was great to analyze since it’s easy to define what the media is trying to portray, as well as to it having distinct images making it intriguing to question and inspect.

Traditionally, many advertisements released by cigarette brands under the Philip Morris label have depicted happy people joined together in friendship (supposedly due to their common habit). Other advertisements attempted to associate cigarettes with sleek mystical figures, sometimes even sexually desirable ones. All this has changed, however, due to recent legal developments in which the cigarette giant was pressured to offer anti-smoking ads, in addition to the usual fictional ones depicting happy mannequins. In no way were they to advertise cigarettes, and they were mandated to help stop youth smoking. These requirements placed Philip Morris in a difficult situation. They needed to satisfy the