Are There Benefits For Attending A Single Sex School? Essay

An article that was written about a school in Texas stated that more than 50% of boys and girls in single-gender classrooms cause disruptions, and they bring their behavior from home into the classrooms at school. In an article, it stated that “in October of 2006, federal regulations established the requirements for legally permissible single-sex schools and classes within the public system; nearly 200 schools in South Carolina have single-gender classrooms” (“Single-Sex Education Spreads” 2). Teachers’ interest often drives the attention of students to single-gender classes, and growing interest from their parents is also pushing more schools and districts as they hear about these classrooms (“Single-Gender Classrooms” 2). While teachers and administrators prefer this environment, boys and girls in single-sex classrooms are influenced to distract and be distracted by their friends, and the people around them. They seem to doodle, daydream, and lose their thought in the classroom because of their surroundings. In a newspaper article, “Should Children Be Taught in Single-Sex Classrooms”, the author says pupils fail to develop relationships with the opposite sex if they are taught in a single-sex environment because they both tend to be drawn into conflict amongst each other, they are distracted by what others are doing in the classrooms, and they are not themselves because they are being forced into an unfamiliar environment they do not

The programs that seperate the sexses in schools are usually based on very questionable science about the differences of girls’ and boys’ brains during development and learning, along with gender stereotypes. The American Civil Liberties Union’s article, ‘Sex-Segregated schools; Separate and Unequal’ says,” Advocates tell teachers that: Boys need a competitive and confrontational learning environment,

Single sex education, which is also known as single gender school is an old approach that’s is gaining new momentum. Single sex education consists of separating males and females into different classrooms or in separate buildings or schools. Advocates of single-sex education believe that there are persistent in how boys and girls learn and behave in educational settings such difference merit educating them separately. One version of this argument holds that brains of males and females develop differently. Proponents reference these developmental differences to argue that by separating students according to their sex, the educator is able to meet the needs according to the developmental trajectory of the different genders. In addition to that,

We all know the obvious difference in boys and girls. Typically, we associate boys with being rougher than girls and spending much of their time playing rambunctiously and getting dirty while most girls prefer to be subdued and tidy. But is that the only dissimilarity in gender? What about school work and academic performance along with academic success? Can gender be a predominating factor in determining a child’s IQ level? Is there a legitimate difference in boys and girls when determining academic ability? And, does gender help determine any level of academic success? Some might say that these are some pretty absurd questions but others who have taught both boys and girls in

Tom Carroll, the creator of Brighter Choice Charter Schools, in support of this proposition states that the key to success in education “ is to eliminate social distraction” which in elementary students he describes as “goofiness” and in older generations as “ the hormonal issues of attraction and sex and boys and girls being impressed with each other”(Meyer). Single-gender schools remove the mentioned hormonal issues and allow teachers and students to both focus on the subject without the usual distraction and complications that arise when both genders are present. In this way, students perform better when segregated by genders and achieve higher proficiency in subjects.

According to an article from (www.nea.org) “Male dominance in the classrooms may come as no surprise to advocates in single gender education who suggest that boys and girls are regularly treated differently in coeducational settings and that both boys and girls could both benefit from single-gender classrooms. Studies suggest that when boys are in single-gender classrooms, they are more successful in school and more likely to pursue a wide range of interests and activities”. Many would agree with this quote because they feel that males and females learn better and would be more successful separated due to no distractions in the classrooms while others might have different beliefs that both genders could be successful in the same classroom because of the contrasting opinions of others and that could be a big help in preparing them for the “real world” because they would know that everyone would have different opinions about situations that get discussed in a classroom and they would most likely know how to take criticism from both genders.

There is a long history of single-sex schooling, in which males and females attend specific classes or schools only with members of their same sex. This separation of genders may be done for educational purposes or in combination with other factors, such as social interactions that occur between male and female students. There is some support for the idea that single-sex schooling can be beneficial, especially for outcomes related to academic achievement and more positive academic aspirations (Lee, 2008). Although, there are many benefits of children attending single-sex schools, evidence shows that sex segregation can also gender stereotyping and legitimizes institutional sexism (Kennedy, 2000).

Single sex schools have less distractions in class. I believe this because in a single sex environment boys do not feel the need to impress girls and girls would not have to downplay their strengths to impress boys. The first example to backup my point is a study by the Australian Council for Educational Research where they said “research indicates that single sex schools improve

Not only does single-sex education create negative transitions into society, but it has been shown to negatively affect boys health and maturity. There has been many studies that show that girls do in fact, have a positive influence on a boy’s maturity. Theoretically it would only be the same in single-sex classrooms. Girls in school, typically have much higher concentration and ability to understand the lesson being taught to them. When in an environment with girls, the boys are able to think in a different way than in an all boy class, because the girls focus in on different perspectives that a guy’s maturity level would not usually be able to comprehend (‘pros

Single-sex schools have proven to be effective according to many researchers. Janice Streitmatter, a researcher, shows a research where students who attended single-sex schools always score higher in their exams than students who attend coed schools. In another research she explains the outcomes on

Single-sex schools, specifically primary schools, are more beneficial to students because they facilitate higher test scores, superior academic outcomes, and greater engagement in school activities. Parents and educators have debated since the early nineteenth century whether to educate students in single-sex or co-ed schools. Currents studies have shown that single-sex schools achieve higher in academic success. Students with higher academic success become adults with a brighter future that can benefit society.

Single sex schools would also increase the academic potential of students by eliminating the male dominated classroom and replacing it with a level playing field for males and females. Stated in the article “research

There are strong claims for and against single-gender education around the globe. Despite extensive research in developing effective teaching practices for boys and girls separately, there are fundamental similarities between meeting the educational needs of girls and boys. There are more commonalities between the two than there are dissimilarities. Boys and girls seem to elicit different kinds of teaching they need due to the constraints that social norms put on each gender. For countries with European roots in their culture, this is also true. Although certain sex-linked characteristics are biologically inherent, how one learns is not dependent on their gender. Both girls and boys are relational learners, educe the kinds of teaching they need and find greater meaning in lessons they find interesting. It is not what sex individuals are born as that dictates what kinds of teaching methods they require, but rather it is how they are designed by their environments that shape their needs. This is particularly true for girls; and even more so for girls of color.

Single sex schools are common within the fait schools and some schools who believe there association within their faith would work out better within a diverse atmosphere. Some believe that having single sex schools is a good idea because then boys would feel more concentrated with their school work instead of trying to impress or compete for the girls. Parents also believe that boys would participate more and be focus with their education if girls were not in the same class as them. As a result, single sex schools should be banned to give children the opportunity to gain a better education and interacting with the opposite sex. Teaching boys and girls in separate classrooms it’s an old approach in which has recently gained momentum. The reason being is some debate on the fact that it reduces boys’ and girls’ opportunities to work together, and reinforces sex stereotypes while others believe that single-sex schooling results in better academic outcomes. Although there has been multiple case studies to find some common ground or to see which one is more beneficial or affective the results fluctuates.

Do people really expect for a child’s grades to improve at an instant? Psychological problems will begin to increase if students do not interact with the opposite sex. Students will lack the advantages of the co-educational elementary, middle, and high school experience. Society may claim a single sex school environment will completely help develop education for students, but they are wrong.