Attention Span In William Shakespeare's Plays

The most common misconception is that reading Shakespeare is not worth your time and doesn’t help you in life. Professor, Michael Mack effectively argues the total disparate. When giving a speech to a group of college freshman, Mack establishes an effective argument that convinces his audience to give Shakespeare a chance and maybe it will help in life in life through his use of rhetorical devices and strong evidence.

Many college students have the misconception that reading Shakespeare is a waste of time. Michael Mack presents a different view in his speech to college freshmen “From Why Read Shakespeare?” Mack’s speech constructed an effective argument that reading shakespeare will help you in life through his use of rhetorical devices and counterclaims.

When you hear the word Shakespeare, you probably think that it is meant for the people that use intellectual language, the literary types, or even the people who have a higher reading level than the average person. Well, a college professor named Michael Mack argues that Shakespeare can be for everyone once you understand it and it can relate to the real world or be a reflection of it. Mack produces an effective argument that although Shakespeare is difficult, it is worth the effort. Through his use of rhetorical devices and counterclaims.

When Romeo and Juliet comes up in school curriculum any observer can see students eagerly signing up for roles, puzzling over Juliet’s eagerness to marry a stranger, or rehearsing their own unique interpretation of the play. In these moments students are released from the usual monotonous class period and allowed to enjoy a timeless piece of literature. While some may claim that Shakespeare is outdated or difficult to read, the positivities of including it in ninth grade curriculum far outweigh any struggles of comprehension.

Most people today don’t see any importance or interest in reading Shakespeare. A lot of people think this because it’s simply “too difficult to understand” or “too much effort”. However, Michael Mack, a college professor, speaks on the contrary to a class of college freshmen. Mack develops an effective argument that reading shakespeare is worth the effort at the end, through his use of rhetorical devices and counterclaims.

“Shakespeare isn’t worth my time!” A common phrase said by college students. Michael Mack gathered a large freshman class and delivered a speech called “Why Read Shakespeare?” noting that the value of reading Shakespeare must, from time, be articulated. Mack generated an effective argument that’s purpose is to persuade people that Shakespeare is indeed difficult to read, but he is worth the effort through his use of rhetorical devices and counterclaims.

We in the 21st century enjoy Shakespeare’s plays for a variety of reasons. His plays have different themes like love, ambition, pride, friendship, supernatural, etc. His language is rich and full of imagery. Many of his famous quotes are used even till today such as "To be, or not to be" and "O Romeo, Romeo! wherefore art thou Romeo?"-Romeo and Juliet, form some of literature's most

Do you ever wonder why Shakespeare is still taught in high school. In high school, Shakespeare was shoved down our throats and I despised Shakespeare and his works. I thought that they were pointless and was just a way to torture high school students, but the more I think about what Shakespeare is trying to teach through his works. The more I respect and understand the themes and the language of his works. The more that you understand the more that you can relate, the more that you can relate the more that you can reflect on the things that you have learned. In this essay, I will argue that Shakespeare’s works are important to learn . I will support my argument by explaining the universal themes in Shakespeare’s

With most lexile levels above 1200, Shakespeare’s plays are too difficult for high school audiences who have lexiles far below that. These plays also consist of words that cannot even be found in a dictionary anymore, therefore students do not have the possibility to look up their definitions and struggle to understand their context. Not only do the plays’ lexiles tower over those of students and the language made to seem aristocratic, but Shakespeare mainly sets his plays overseas within a series of abnormal events, incomprehensible to those who have never experienced these setting types before. With the use of technology to modernize William Shakespeare’s plays, students may find there to be less hatred towards these dramas because of the difficulty to understand and more enthusiasm about reading this legendary playwright’s

High school students have a negative attitude towards Shakespeare and his work. In the article “Kill Bill: Why We Must Take Shakespeare Out of the Classroom” it’s forsaid that “His words were chosen to be spoken or heard, not to be read and deadened behind a desk” (Powell). Teaching Shakespeare in high school is already too late, most students think it’s boring when coming to the topic “Shakespeare.” As read in the article, “Kill Bill: Why We Must Take Shakespeare Out of the Classroom.” it says that “plays are not meant to be taught like this,” (Powell).

Shakespeare once said, “ life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .” Shakespeare was an English poet and a playwright, his works are taught throughout schools. One common work of his is Romeo and Juliet. I believe high schools should continue to teach Shakespeare's work, especially Romeo and Juliet because his works are inspirations to others, they contain valuable life lessons, formed the English language, and provides students with critical thinking abilities.

William Shakespeare is a renowned author, playwright, and poet, but some teachers are taking The Bard’s works out of their curriculum. This is absurd because there are so many advantages to reading and reenacting Shakespeare. Teachers should continue to expose students to Shakespeare because it is relevant, mentally stimulating, and relatable.

Pursuing further why Shakespeare should not be taught in school is because Shakespeare is very difficult to understand. “Shakespeare's way with words can be tough for students to grasp”.(DeBlasis) Shakespeare is a lot to comprehend because the way Shakespeare speaks is very different from today's text”.(DeBasis) Shakespeare is very tough to understand now days

The morals and values presented in his works speak to the audience, often offering a new perspective on the world in which they live. Students are affected by the powerful and complex characters and are rewarded with profound insights into human nature and behavior.I firmly believe that Shakespeare's works, like no other literature in the high school curriculum, challenge and invigorate the minds of students. Because of the complex characters, difficult vocabulary and style in which he writes, students must elevate their level of learning to grasp a clear understanding of his works. Shakespeare's plays hold intricate meanings and messages. His

What is the first thing that comes to mind about Shakespeare? Some might recall famous lines such as "O Romeo, Romeo, Wherefore art thou Romeo (2.2.33)," or "To be or not to be". Some might acknowledge his works, such as one of his biggest hits Romeo and Juliet. There are so many things one can think of when it comes to Shakespeare because he was such a prolific writer. That's why it's no surprise that Romeo and Juliet is in the ninth grade curriculum. His works have been around for quite a while which should mean he was an effective writer. Yet, teenagers draw a blank and suddenly lose interest when his works come up. All they can think of is to read or not to read. Yes, times have changed, but is Romeo and Juliet still relevant? Although