Autocratic Leadership

Autocratic Autocratic leadership describes the leadership style as the individual having absolute power within the group without input from other work colleagues (Craven 2014). This style of leadership, the autocratic leader makes the decisions and takes responsibility for the achievements of the organisation. Autocratic leaders decide which group members contribute and how much they contribute without consulting (Vugt, Jepson, Hart and Cremer 2004 (cited in Craven 2014). According to Northouse

Autocratic leadership can manifest in different ways. It is therefore not completely rigid and different situations can influence how the organisation and the leader implement the style. The three manifestations are: • Directing autocratic leadership • Permissive autocratic leadership • Paternalistic autocratic leadership These three, while still showcasing the core characteristics of autocratic style, tend to use slightly different ways of approaching the flexibility within the decision-making

leader leads, and the boss drives” ("Leadership,"). This leadership quote exemplifies a profound perception between someone who leads and someone whose authority merely comes from their position. The “boss” has the ability to empower and to fire others. On the contrary, a truly a leader does not maneuvers his authority to enforce rules to his own benefit. They much rather lead than drive those they are responsible for. With that being said, an autocratic leadership style is an authoritarianism, where

Stagg and Coulter (2012, p. 606) the General Manager, Edward of 6 Steps & Rising has adopted an autocratic leadership style. The University of Iowa Studies identifies an autocratic leader as a leader that centralises authority, controls work methods and processes, makes independent decisions and restricts participation or feedback from employees (Robbins et al., 2012). He practices autocratic leadership styles when he centralises authority by disallowing Albert to see the chief executive officer regarding

Leadership Comparison Two leadership styles on the opposite ends of the spectrum from one another are autocratic and participative. Both can be useful depending on the setting and what is required. Autocratic leaders make decisions without using team members, even if it would be useful (mindtools.com, n.d.). When a decision needs to be made very quickly, when there is not a need for additional input, or when a team agreement is not needed, this type of leadership can work (mindtools.com, n.d.)

Autocratic and Participative Leadership Leadership styles have significant effects on organizations. For instance, it influences organizational culture and determines how leaders address conflict. Ultimately, it impacts organizational performance. Consequently, leaders must adapt their approach to achieve the desired outcome. Therefore, it is imperative leaders understand and can implement a variety of leadership styles. This essay will describe how an autocratic and participative leader’s style

Leadership, a crucial element in business, can be defined as “a process of influencing the activities of an organized group toward goal achievement” (Yukl, 2013, p.76). There are four main types of leadership styles: the autocratic, democratic, paternalistic and laissez-faire leadership styles. Daft (2008, p.44) suggests that “the extent to which leaders should be boss-centered or subordinate-centered partly depends on organizational circumstances.” After taking into account the organizational circumstances

 Poor listener& Uses conflict for individual gain Advantages of autocratic leadership  Quick Decisions  Close Oversight  Total Control  Streamlined Work Process  Easy to Learn The autocratic, or "do this or else," type of leadership is intuitive  Good for Inexperienced or Unmotivated Workers./Bad for Highly Skilled and Motivated Workers.  Leader Dependence.  Increased Work Burden Effects of Authoritarian Leadership  Increase in productivity when leader is present  Produces more accurate

the most effective leadership style, which can bring the best profit and suit all organizations, in the world. Same to autocratic leadership and democratic leadership styles, they have contrastive characteristics and respective benefits and drawbacks so that they will do positive effects only be utilized right way in suitable condition. When strong control is needed, the autocratic leadership style can be used in this situation where there is no space for error. And autocratic leaders can prevent

Autocratic Leadership Style Before we move towards the discussion about autocratic style of leadership we should have to know what leadership is. Many researchers define leadership in different words but a general point of view is that, leadership is the act of social influence of a person upon other companions, colleagues and subordinates by his/her different qualities in any organization which is performed by the individual voluntarily or due to his/her job for the achievement of group goals in