Bob Hopkins currently works for White Lumber Company (WLC), he was previously employed at a commercial bank. He wanted to move on from the banking industry and make use of his college degree and experience in another industry. Hopkins decided to take a job offer from a customer at the bank when he learns the trader position is incentive based and involves buying and selling. Before this incident, Bob Hopkins is unaware of any poor dealings occurring in the company. Hopkins faces a dilemma at his company when his associates want him to make a risky and unethical decision. Hopkins is left with two options: removing himself from the White Lumber Company to avoid possible legal situations or keeping his position and fulfilling the order of construction …show more content…
From Stan’s perspective, he is focused on securing financial stability for his self and his company. He believes everyone is completely protected in this situation and does not see anything wrong with selling the wood as construction lumber. During the conversation, Stan mentioned the foreman on the job site has expectations of cutting cost and wants to avoid paying for scaffold plank as well. Upon concluding their conversation, Bob was not sold on the idea of being part of the possible injury of innocent people. Bob’s investigation into the Quality Lumber sale eventually got back to his boss, John White. John White is a known community leader and holds the position as the director of White Lumber Company (WLC). John decided to offer Hopkins a job as a trader after getting acquainted with Bob while a customer at the commercial bank Bob worked to after graduating college. John sees the talent Hopkins possess and knew he would contribute to the company’s …show more content…
Bob is aware of the consequences the company will face if someone dies or become injured due to the lumber wood being used for scaffold plank. After learning the company has history in being unethical and Stan admitting to the future use of the wood, he is already in jeopardy of being involved in the unlawful sale. Before speaking with his boss, he knew the lives of innocent people are far more important than the company breaking even. If Bob does not go through with order, I recommend he start looking for another job immediately. Not going along with his boss’ decision could result in Bob being treated unfairly by him and other workers or his boss may decide to fire him before he gets the chance to
The case involving Birch & Davis International, Inc., and Warren M. Christopher, the United States Secretary of State was decided on September 13th, 1993. The case involved procurement procedures conducted by the Agency of International Development (Open Jurist). The issue centered on exclusion of bids made by Birch & Davis International, Inc. Birch challenged the exclusion to the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals and they decided that the actions taken by the agency were fair. The case got to the Federal level when Birch appealed the decision by the board.
Hopkins v. Price-Waterhouse is a very detailed case, that features many aspects of the patriarchy, and lingering ways of thinking about gender that are hopefully being phased out of modern society. The Supreme Court chose not to make a ruling, which was the right decision in a legal sense, though there was more proof that Hopkins was discriminated against.
The lumber was ordered, purchased and received on December 31. It is being held for a future sale as of the year end date. The terms of purchase are FOB destination.
The Supreme Court does a great deal for our nation today. Everyday they work on ongoing cases, making some very difficult decisions. One of these cases is the case of Timothy Carpenter, who believes it was unconstitutional when the FBI searched his cell phone records without a warrant.
A couple of employees from Westchester Distributing are accused of bribing a customer with $2 per case kickbacks in exchange for purchasing 100 cases of slow moving beer. Vincent Patton is faced with the challenge of making a decision based on ethics or company profitability. If Mr. Patton decides to fire all three employees, the company will not be able to run at full capacity. On the other hand, if he decides to ignore the situation, he will be promoting their actions.
Client History Bob Jones, a 40-year old Caucasian male come to counseling to help resolve several issues in his life. The client can be found in the movie, “My Life”. Bob is happily married to his wife Gail, and they’re expecting their first child. However, Bob received a diagnosis of kidney cancer that is terminal.
DO YOU AGREE WITH MR. WILSON 'S ESTIMATE OF THE COMPANY 'S LOAN REQUIREMENTS? HOW MUCH WILL HE NEED TO FINANCE THE EXPECTED EXPANSION IN SALES TO $ 5.5 MILLION IN 2006 AND TO TAKE ALL TRADE DISCOUNTS?
The Cartwright Lumber Company had been found in 1994 as a partnership by Mark Cartwright and his brother-in-law Henry Stark. Later in 2001, Mr. Cartwright bought out Stark’s shares and incorporated the business. Now, Mr. Cartwright is a sole owner and president of the company. The business is located in the Pacific Northwest region and does the retail distribution of lumber products in the local area. Plywood, moldings, and sash and door are some of the typical products of the company.
Canada and the United States have always shared a familial relationship both politically and economically. The transfer of capital, labour and market between these two has been entrenched and institutionalized on many levels throughout their history. Despite such positive relations, one particular sector of the economy has undergone intense scrutiny and friction, which is that of the softwood lumber trade. Since the 1980’s this has been a hotly-contested and debated issue between the two economies, with both sides sharing perspectives of indifference constantly. Both nations share a large geographical land area that allows them to export lumber en masse globally, but particular arguments have revolved around the practices of both opposing sides in their trade with one another. This paper’s aim is to produce an analysis on the historical origin, evolution, and current reality of the lumber dispute today.
Miller uses Death of a Salesman to shed light on the American Dream “for the sham it is” claims Raine. Willy has bought into this
The verbal agreement entered into in early January 2014 was that Mr Garbiec, trading as Multi Design Floors, would source the timber and lay polished timber flooring for Mr Kunz for $5,000.00 plus the cost of the timber.
In turn, the narrator fails to recognize the humanity of his workers and reduces them to workers in his business. When describing his workers, he also focuses on their age, a factor that would determine how hard they work or how long they will work for him. His focus when describing his third employee, Ginger Nut, is he “was a lad of some twelve years old [and worked] at the rate of one dollar a week.” (14) This concentration on age and financial rate displays his non-existent desire to know his employees on a personal scale, only for their benefit to the company and how much money they cost him. The narrator’s desire for a successful business is evident in his reaction to Bartleby’s refusal to copy papers.
Willy, a 60 year old man who views himself as the greatest salesman of all time, sees himself as a hero and the man who provides for his family at all times. He goes on long roadtrips trying to bring in money for the household so they can achieve “The American Dream”, risking his mental health. As a result, others viewed him as a successful, and ambitious man that will risk any and everything to get to the top. Therefore, Willy tries to bring in as much money as be can, and he even tries to persuade his boss to give him better work, instead of traveling. Willy states, “I averaged a hundred and seventy dollars a week in the year of 1928!.” In other words, Willy is insisting a salary raise, and a non-traveling schedule so he continue providing for his family.
It is clear from the case study that Alistair knows the contract is unorthodox. The problem he faces is whether he should overlook the bribe or report it to the board. The board of directors expects Alistair to tell the truth and report the bribe because of: his position as Chief Legal Officer, the board has a very strong ethics policy and they are wary of unethical activities.
Jack’s should process the logs into lumber because the company will make $4,480,000 versus the $4,000,000 it would make by selling the logs for use in cabins.