The theory to separate NaCl of the other components of first extraction because NaCl is “one component that is soluble in specific added solvents” which is water in this project. Then filtrate is used to separate the solid Nacl from the water. If done correctly, after filtrate the water should return clear into beaker 2. This is a physical change because when salt is added to water they make saltwater. This is done because once heated and the water is evaporated it ends up being a white substance which is the salt because the heat only removed the water. The filter paper after the first extraction contained SiO2. To separate SiO2 and CaCO3 they used a chemical method because they were trying to separate the substances from one another which created a supernatant liquid and a residue. …show more content…
CaCO3(s) + 2HCl(aq) = H2O(l) + CO2(g) + CaCl2(aq). This caused a bubbling reaction to occur to CaCO3 because the compound was changed to CaCl2. The name of the supernatant liquid that was in the evaporating dish with the sand after the chemical reaction took place was CaCl2. To remove the supernatant liquid from the evaporating dish they decant as much of the liquid as possible into beaker 1 and the evaporating dish was placed on top of a beaker of boiling hot water until the SiO2 was completely dry. Chemical 2M K2CO3 was added to the supernatant liquid after it was decant into the beaker and boiled for 5 minutes. This chemical was added to CaCl2 because the residue it leaves behind is CaCO3. CaCl2(aq) + K2Co3(aq) = 2 KCl(aq) +
3. Turned off the laboratory burner and observed the properties of the product in the evaporating dish.
We then proceeded in testing for excess Ca2+ by adding two drops of .5 M K2C2O4 to test tube two and attentively observed to see if a precipitate formed, which it did. This meant that Ca2+ was in excess and C2O42- was the limiting reactant in the original salt mixture. We then cleaned up. Upon returning to our next class, we took the filter paper, with the precipitate on it, and took its mass.
Experiment 55 consists of devising a separation and purification scheme for a three component mixture. The overall objective is to isolate in pure form two of the three compounds. This was done using extraction, solubility, crystallization and vacuum filtration. The experiment was carried out two times, both of which were successful.
= = == Calcium Carbonate + Hydrochloric Acid Calcium Chloride + Water + Carbon Dioxide Equipment ---------
14 mL of 9 M H2SO4 was added to the separatory funnel and the mixture was shaken. The layers were given a small amount of time to separate. The remaining n-butyl alcohol was extracted by the H2SO4 solution therefore, there was only one organic top layer. The lower aqueous layer was drained and discarded. 14 mL of H2O was added to the separatory funnel. A stopper was placed on the separatory funnel and it was shaken while being vented occasionally. The layers separated and the lower layer which contained the n-butyl bromide was drained into a smaller beaker. The aqueous layer was then discarded after ensuring that the correct layer had been saved by completing the "water drop test" (adding a drop of water to the drained liquid and if the water dissolves, it confirms that it is an aqueous layer). The alkyl halide was then returned to the separatory funnel. 14 mL of saturated aqeous sodium bicarbonate was added a little at a time while the separatory funnel was being swirled. A stopper was placed on the funnel and it was shaken for 1 minute while being vented frequently to relieve any pressure that was being produced. The lower alkyl halide layer was drained into a dry Erlenmeyer flask and 1.0 g of anhydrous calcium chloride was added to dry the solution. A stopper was placed on the Erlenmeyer flask and the contents were swirled until the liquid was clear. For the distillation
The mixture was heated at 120°C using an aluminum block and was stirred gently. After all of the solid dissolved, it was heated for 20 additional minutes to ensure the reaction was complete.
Me and my lab partner, obtained a mixture of a un known proportion from the instructor and then flow the guide line in our lab manual to separate the mixture by applying the separation method motioned in our lab manual pages 33-40 . In this experiment, the separation methods were decantation,
The objective of this extraction experiment was to achieve a comprehensive understanding, as well as master the practice, of the technique of separating various individual components of a compound.
There are millions of different organic compounds. Most of them are found in mixtures and in order to achieve a pure form they need to be separated, isolated, and purified. However, there are endless numbers of possible mixtures, which make it impossible to have a pre-designed procedure for every mixture. So chemists often have to make their own procedures. The purpose of this experiment was to prepare the student to the real world by them designing their own procedure which will help them understand the techniques of separation and purification better. The goal was to extract two of the components of the
The wet, crude product was placed into the 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask. Small amounts of CaCl2 were added to dry the solution. The flask was sealed and the mixture was swirled and left to settle. Once
The purpose of this experiment is to familiarize oneself with the general procedures determining a partition coefficient at the microscale level and learn in weighing milligram quantities of materials on an electronic balance, the use of automatic pipets, the use of transfer pipet, and the use of a vortex mixer. Also, to familiarize oneself with extraction
Overall, the results were almost as expected. It was predicted that Magnesium and Calcium would have a similar reaction will the hydrochloric acid and produce approximately that same quantity of hydrogen gas. However, the results demonstrated that the Calcium reacted more vigorously than expected and produced a larger quantity of hydrogen gas. The reaction which occurred whilst using Magnesium resulted exactly like the prediction. It was expected that the metal would bubble, eventually dissolve and produce gas which would potentially displace the water in the test tube. With the reaction involving Calcium, it was not predicted that it would heat up the conical flask and react as violently. It was expected that the Tin would either have a
When all but approximately 10- mL of liquid has been transferred, swirl the beaker to suspend the precipitated CaCO3. Transfer this to the funnel.
This process was then repeated two more times with subsequent additions of 10 mL of the 0.5M aqueous NaHCO3 and the aqueous layers drained off into the above mention labeled 100-mL beaker. Finally 5 mL of deionized water was placed into the funnel and mixed. The water was then drained off into the beaker containing the aqueous solution extracts. The solution was then saved until need later in the experiment.
= == CaCO3(s) + 2HCC(l) CaCl2 (aq) + H2O(l) + CO2