California Hypothesis

The data provided is helpful in determining the nations perception of democracy so that it may help improve and put in place interventions that promote

The article’s main idea is to point out the negative effects a raise in taxes for corporations will have in Oregon residents. A potential increase of $2.5 billion per year in tax revenue would result in better funding for public services. Such financial resources are portrayed in this article as both having job creating and job eliminating outcomes. If their data is accurate, the public sector would see an increase of 6,000 new positions. However, in the private sector, the effects are the complete opposite with an estimated reduction of at least 15,000 jobs, resulting in a 9,000 difference. Tax supporters would like voters to believe that only big corporations would be affected by the tax, but small businesses would pay more for the goods and services they bought from big corporations that paid the tax (The Oregonian,

Next up holding strong at 11.7 percent is a man who is not just a corporate tool but a corporate tool shed, the union busting government of Wisconsin Scott Walker: now what can I say about Scott Walker that a million angry teachers haven't said about him while sticking pins into their Scott Walker voodoo tools. Scott walker is the kind of guy who would mail his parents a suicide letter COD, not also has he made a reputation of busting unions, an agenda that makes our rich corporate overlords profit margins stand at full attention, but he has already wreaked the Wisconsin economy with such ferocious austerity measures that even the Greek Oligarchs think he's Doctor Doom in a bad tie. That's right kids these boots where made for Walker and that's

Arnold announced some facts which have already been demonstrating that poverty and joblessness is a result of personal failing is particularly American. And the major reason to indicate this bad result is because the united states’ welfare system is extraordinary undemocratic: outdoor relief is limited and plenty of working positions are coercive which means workers have no choices. Also, general public assumption that poor people are irresponsible and had attitude. Much worse, the federal welfare itself have many problems like cheating and dependency which cause a large amount of paupers won’t get their welfare. All in all, as I could say the cures for these situation is let those people who live in a poverty condition have right to speak up and give them more chance to have a flexible job which means gives them more chances. Also the government should drop the surveillance and political control in order to make those powerlessness worker have their confident and legal

The class conflict between the poverty- stricken migrants and the settled, assured business occupied Californians make for a powerful analysis

The independent variable is the poor treatment of Mexican girls and women of the maquiladora by the corporations and government.

According to the US Census Bureau, California’s 21st District has 246,607 people over the age of 16 that are employed. The economy’s industry is mostly made up of agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting – 74,874. In second place are careers in healthcare and educational services – 39, 435. And in third place are careers in retail trade – 23,007. The unemployment rate in the 21st Congressional District is a lot higher compared to the nation as a whole which

that receive some kind of welfare benefits are soon going increase and become the majority of the population. The working class will become the minority and this will create an imbalance causing the

The welfare state makes capitalism and democracy possible by allowing a partial free market since regulations are put into place. By doing this, it aims to mobilize the working class. For instance, labor market policies protect the working class through “passive measures such as unemployment insurance that help soften the blows to individuals caused by market dislocations, [and] active measures such as worker training”(Schulze-Cleven, pg.80). Through these measures the working class is still being helped, but at the expense of others, through taxation. For example, unemployment insurance “is administered by states according to federal and state guidelines, and it is financed through a complex mix of federal and state payroll taxes”(Schulze-Cleven, pg.82). Through taxation the state gains power, but the population benefits from it.

The purpose of Arthur B. Laffer’s article was to talk about unemployment and how the benefits are not spur and there has been debates over expanding government unemployment benefits. Unemployment benefits are a protection for people that is down on their luck and need some extra assistance. Laffer states in the article that the most clear contention against developing or raising unemployment benefits is that it will make being unemployed either more appealing or less ugly, and along these lines lead to higher unemployment. Unemployment benefits are an incredible approach to stimulate request. According to this article, practical judgment skills and individual experience demonstrate higher unemployment benefits will make unemployment less ugly

Congressman response to the ongoing refusal by Republican about unemployment insurance. He said that it’s unacceptable to wait for a vote for approval when million of people are waiting for the money in order to support their families. Also, according to the article, unemployment insurance is known for one of the most effective way to improving the economy and creating jobs.

A directional hypothesis puts a team in an advantageous position. The process of comparing groups becomes simplified. Information that links variables are visible. The focus point of the directional hypotheses provides clarity to the receiving

In any economy, no matter whether it is controlled by the government or by free markets, people need to work in order to support it. The government does not generate tax revenue by magic. There have to be people in that economy earning an income to ensure that the government continues to collect taxes. In a free market economy, the same applies because there are some services which only an organized government can supply (such as protection from extra-national threats), but there also those which the people get for themselves because of the working of the markets. In any scenario, unemployment is, at the very least, a drag on the economy, and it can be much worse. This paper examines how the unemployment rate in the United States is underreported, and how that fact effects the sluggishness of the present economy.

According to the following article, foreign imports and trade do affect un-skilled workers, making them lose their jobs. “At first glance, it seems unlikely that foreign trade should have a significant impact on the employment of unskilled workers.” “Attention to the linkage between foreign trade and labor market trends is a part of a broader debate on whether the falling wages and employment rates of less educated male workers in the United States are due to skill-biased technical change or to foreign trade” (Pryor, 1999) If this article argues that foreign import and trading does affect unemployment, it may explain why some voters would vote “no” on the Stata data and it may also prove that one’s political party does not necessarily have an affect on what the voters voted.

I made this diagram as to have an overall view about determining the analysis of the unemployment issue: