I am writing about China’s One Child Policy. This is something that I am against. I do not think you should limit a family to one child. There are many problems with this policy that I do not think were thought about when the policy was created. I have not found many good things about this policy. The only positive thing I have found about this policy is that it creates many chances for adoption. But most of these children who are up for adoption do not get adopted. So I do not support China’s one-child policy.
One reason I am against China’s one-child policy is because I wonder what they originally planned to do with the children that the parents did not want. With the one-child policy, parents who have a child who is special needs or a
…show more content…
For the parents, as they age, the child is the one who will take care of them and be their security in their old age. The child is also the one who ensures their parents are not alone or unsafe. If the child has passed away, there is no one to take care of the aging parents. So the loss of the child is very devastating for these families (Xiao-Tain Feng, 2014, p. 26).
China’s one-child policy was created to decrease China’s population. But it has also created a generation of spoiled children. Since the parents only have one child, they can focus more resources on that one child. If they were to have two or three children, then their resources would have to be divided (Confernece, 2013). But this also leaves a lot of “hidden children”. “Hidden children” is the term used to describe all of the children who were abandoned, who are orphans, who are homeless, or who were put into the sex trade. This can also be used to describe children who the government does not know about.
Not all parents wanted to give up their children. Because of the one-child policy, some parents have been forced to lie to the government in order to protect themselves and their families. Women will have hidden births then just do not tell the government about their new daughter (Johnson, 2016). Or they will send their daughter to a local adoptive family so they can keep their little girl. This can sometimes mean that children are passed around from family to family in a rotation just to keep them and
China’s one-child policy caused the policy nation to have fewer workers and more elderly.The number of youth workers has gone down factories report. In 2007 there were six adults for every retiree, but by 2040 that ratio is expected to drop to 2 to 1. Too few children to care for them, China’s
Since 1980, China has made its people the subject of an intrusive and unfair, One Child Policy. This policy was the result of Chinese officials becoming worried of the countries jump in population from 1960 to 1980 causing a widespread lack of resources, so they decided to induct a law that would make force Chinese citizens to be limited to one child. Because of this controversial policy the question has been raised, did the one child policy positively or negatively effect China? The one child policy did negatively effect China and its people, because it resulted in gender discrimination, unjust punishments and was unnecessary due to the already declining fertility rate.
China’s One Child Policy was founded in 1949, this policy was founded upon the idea that China’s population was growing at an exponential rate (Doc B). China had one of the largest growing populations at over 150 million every year and with a population density of over 104 people/sq. km in rural areas and in cities up to 22,350/sq. km (Pop. Den.). China’s One Child Policy focuses on lowering the fertility rate of women and in turn lowers the population and population density, this is done by limiting most of the Chinese society to only having one child. China’s One Child Policy was a good idea because it focused on academic achievement, lessened the load on the environment and lowers fertility rates in women which then in turn lowers the already crowded Chinese population.
The final reason that the one-child policy was a bad idea is because of the fact that China’s fertility rate was already decreasing and was one of the lowest rates compared to Brazil, South Korea, and Thailand in 1979 making the policy pointless and unnecessary. “The claim by the Chinese officials that the one child policy has helped avert over 400 million births simply cannot be substantiated by
There has been a long history of China’s one child policy, since it was first introduces in 1979 by a Chinese Leader Deng Xiaoping (Rosenberg n.p). The law was meant to be temporary and used to control the population; however it is still in use today (Rosenberg n.p). When the policy was first enforced, it only
The freedom that Americans have to raise their children according to their beliefs starkly contradicts the one-child policy implemented in China. The one-child policy was a program designed to restrict Chinese families to only one child, with severe consequences lined up for those who disobeyed. It was met with harsh opposition, from Chinese citizens as well as from other countries. The policy succeeded in creating smaller families, but it unleashed a slew of unintended consequences, including a higher crime rate and an increase in the elderly population, who only have one child to support them. Most significantly, the policy caused a national “gendercide” and an influx of Chinese bachelors, indirectly causing an increase in sex trafficking in and around the country. Did the one-child policy achieve its intended effect, or did it cause many more inadvertent effects that it could not control?
Although the One-Child Policy in China had downfalls, the benefits overcome. In fact, many believe China’s One-Child Policy was not a good idea and had many flaws. I strongly believe China’s One-Child Policy was a sufficient theory in assisting environmental crises, strengthening feminine power, and revealing benefits of having singleton
Due to the one-child policy there are many serious human rights infractions. Since the policy has been in effect, there have been more than 400 million prevented births ("China:
One of the more extreme measures taken in an attempt to control population has been China's one-child policy. Population advocate Garet Hardin suggests the rest of the world adopt similar policies. This paper is to show a country's government acting on theories that Hardin is popular for and the ethical and environmental effects that it had on people and the land. Hardin fails to see the ethical problems laid out by governments that suppress peoples thoughts and beliefs.
After China suffered population overcrowding, China passed the one-child policy to fix these problems in 1979. The policy tried to lower fertility rates, the rate of child births and pregnancies, but was the one child policy a good idea? Despite this, the one child policy was not a good idea for China because the population was already lowering, lack of young workers, and social issues.
What is important to understand the One Child Policy is the reasoning behind it and what spurred the Chinese government to do something so drastic. When Mao Zedong’s communist rule was in full
“China Will Have another Major Demographic Problem,” is an article on About.com written by Matt Rosernberg. It explains the great imbalance between man and women due to China’s One Child Policy, and how this situation will disturb the stability and development of China because the high numbers of bachelors tend to damage community by doing crimes and violence. The policy says that a couple could only have a child. This was created as a temporary solution since China was overpopulated by 972 million people in 1979 (Rosenberg). Through years this policy is proven to reduce the population growth. However, there have been some unintended side effects. Not only did this policy create the gender imbalance, but also many other issues, such as: the high population of unmarried men, human trafficking, and the high rate of suicide.
There are more than 1.3 billion people living and building families in China. Until a century ago, many Chinese families included multiple generations living in the same household. Today, though, it's no longer the norm. A typical Chinese family today includes a married man and woman with one child, and this is generally known as the core family. The percentage of core families continues to rise above other types of family units. This not due to a social coincidence, but a direct reflection of the Chinese government's population control policies.
While China has been impacted with a one-child policy, this has not only caused dysfunction in the family, but also has created functional improvements as well; in terms of taking control over the country’s population crisis. In the 1970’s China upgraded women statuses by implementing a forcible policy for all women to obey, called the one-child policy which allows some women to give birth to only one child; and no more or strict consequences would be enforced and applied. This policy was designed to educate women, on the importance of a one-child family; in order to reduce the overwhelming population in China. By doing this China in turn would give the families money for adhering to the rules set forth, by abiding to their wishes and accepting a certification and cash rewards; just for maintaining stability on not placing a cash levy on the state for births. Women that became pregnant after the first child was conceived would soon be asked to part with the unborn, by that of terminating the birthing of that new addition (or child); if a one-child certificate was in the hand of the pregnant mother to be. "If she refuses she loses her bonus, will be left out of the next wage increase, and will suffer scorn by her co-workers" (Lindsey, 2011, pg. 147).
During the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Mao Zedong encouraged the people of China to multiply and create manpower. There was no official policy in but the government’s condemned contraceptives and banned the import of some. As a result, the population of China doubled over the next few years. The population in China grew from 540 million in 1949 to 940 million in 1976.