RUNNING HEAD: CLAYTON INDUSTRIES CASE ANALYSIS
CLAYTON INDUSTRIES
A Case Analysis
Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Company Background 3 Problem Statement 5 Internal Factors 5 External Factors 6 Analysis 7 Industry 7 SWOT 7 Alternatives 9 Revitalize Clayton SpA 9 Absorption Chillers 11 Recommendations 13 Considerations of Peter Arnell 13 Reduce Capital Use 14 Reduce Costs 14 Rationalize Product Line 15 Align for Growth 16 Conclusion 18 References 19 Appendix 20
Executive Summary
In the midst of a global recession, Clayton Industries is challenged by a diminishing demand for their product and rising variable costs. These issues are further compounded by stiff market competition that
…show more content…
The 10/10/10 plan called for all European companies to reduce receivables and inventories by 10 days and to reduce personnel by 10 percent. For “Top Four in Four”, each country manager was to prepare a plan to show how the product for which they had European-wide responsibility would hold a top four share of the European market in four years (Bartlett et al., p.3). In June of 2009, Buis fired Paolo Lazzaro, president of Clayton SpA since 1998, for his attitude that Italy should “weather the storm” of what he felt was just a low in the commodity cycle and not developing a plan of action. Peter Arnell, named successor of Italy in July, was tasked with turning Clayton SpA around and meeting corporate initiatives.
Problem
Clayton Industries was struggling due to the recent recession. However, Clayton SpA was particularly faltering - losing approximately one million dollars a month in mid-2009. Since 2004, Italy had been behind other European countries in revenue growth. Sales declined 5.3% in 2008 and in the first half of 2009 dropped by 19.4% (Bartlett et al., p.3). Accomplishing either corporate initiative set by Buis would be difficult for Clayton SpA. Inventory and receivables were both above 120 days and a reduction of 10 days would be difficult. Several factors, both internal and external, lead to the situation Italy faced at the time.
Internal Factors
Paolo Lazzaro had previously
Based on the textbook and my understanding, whenever there are negotiations between a procurer and a supplier regarding a competitive bidding, the first thing that might be favored is the scope of the project, meaning both will sit down and discuss the entire project prior the work begins. Meanwhile, during the negotiations, evaluation criteria should be clear, and stated and defined. As the evaluation is based on the criteria stated and the procurer can request or ask the supplier’s opinions on certain specifications and where things can be improved.
In this case study, we will be analyzing the current position of how well Kingsford is within the marketplace and determine which of the issues are plausible causes in its drop in revenue. We will be creating a comprehensive strategy as well as a marketing plan to evaluate and adjust the matter at hand. First we will begin with identifying the issues and implementing a method to reemphasize the importance of marketing in the business. The goal is to create a marketing plan that will add value to Kingsford’s market share, sales, and profitability.
Next to first-hand experience, case studies are one of the best ways to learn project management skills. In The Crosby Manufacturing Corporation case study, Harold Kerzner reports on the executive-level exchange between the company president and other department heads regarding a new Management Cost and Control System (Kerzner, 2009). This paper will give a synopsis of the case, analyze the case study communications issues and risks, and evaluate Livingston’s selection of a project manager. It will also discuss the possible reactions from the employees, the impact on the cost and time on the
The biggest challenge Peter faces is the stagnant growth that Clayton SpA has experienced in recent years, especially with a 5.3% decline in 2008 and 19.4% drop in the first quarter of 2009 for Italy. This lack of sales directly affects receivables and inventory. Coupled with a strong union in Italy (FILM), these two forces directly contribute to the difficulty of fulfilling the 10/10/10 plan. Based on these trends, a “top four in four” years is unlikely unless SpA can
At the time of this case study, 2002, Timken was involved in company-wide restructuring. They were consolidating current operational segments into global business units to reduce expenses. Their goal was more penetration in global markets due to reduced growth in the US based on the bearing industry’s cyclical nature. Analysts predicted 2-3% industry growth in the US, but 6.5% global growth through 2005. The slow US growth was directly tied to the automotive industry’s cyclical nature, which was declining in 2002. Global penetration would help to achieve economies of scale, whilst hedging the
By acquiring Calphalon, not only did Newell add an upper-end product to their cookware divisions, but they also gained extensive knowledge in the pull strategy sales process that had proven to be successful. This process was a source of competitive advantage for Calphalon and could be extremely useful to Newell and their goal to continue adding higher-end products to each of their divisions. The acquisition of Rubbermaid brings even greater challenges to Newell Company as it is by far their largest acquisition yet. Despite Newell’s continued success in acquiring and restructuring companies, investors clearly lack confidence in their ability to manage such a large turnaround, as news of the agreement resulted in an 11% decrease in stock price.
By end of 90’s the company was dominant in many of the categories it competed in. The challenge was found in whether it can continue its dominance in it’s new, expanding product ranges and could maintain its dominance and synergy in its all categories on low and high price offering in hardware, home furnishings, office and house ware, while maintaining its management and corporate structures.
Given today’s economy, and the bleak economic outlook, I do not believe Williams-Sonoma will continue to exist with its’ current strategies and objectives to serve its’ below target market consumers. Bottom line is many consumers cannot afford the products being sold by the company. Although, the company’s target market is in the 10% of wealthiest consumers, and had total earnings of over 3.5 billion. (2010 shareholders meeting). Other avenues of generating revenue must be explored. I fear that even the 10% will eventually become more cost conscious in the
Cumberland Metal Industries (CMI) should price their new cushioning pads at $900 to maximize profit. CMI should begin by targeting the customers that will find the greatest value in the product an pay the most. This allow the company to maximize unit contribution, and leave available options for dealing with future competition and sales challenges.
Investment in the Detroit plant has lagged significantly from other plants in the corporation. As a result, the infrastructure and machinery is outdated, haphazard, and inefficient.
So with business going so well for Solectron, how did everything go wrong for the company starting in 2001? Revenue fell from $6.5 billion in 3rd quarter 2000 to $2.2 billion in the same quarter of 2001. The company laid-off 20,000 employees; its stock plummeted; it was faced with plant closures, excess inventory and reduction of floor space. Was it a case of poor planning and management or just the company a victim of an economic downturn? This case analysis will explore what Solectron did wrong and what they could have done and offer some suggestions. It is also interesting to note the Solectron foresaw a pending boom in the Asia (China & India) markets and that if it was able to weather the prevailing storm, Solectron stood a chance of rising up again and succeed.
Automotive Builders, Inc. (ABI) is a company that consistently changed its production lines and strategic goals relative to the needs of the times, starting out producing diesel engine parts for tractors in the 1940’s, switching over to the production of parts for military vehicles during World War II, and then, after the war, settling into its current placement in both the automobile and tractor industry. Due to the downturn in the economy and stiff and superior competition in both quality and price rising up from the Japanese who had recently entered into the industry, ABI is trying to find productive and innovative ways to improve sales and guarantee placement as the number one company in its
Caterpillar is an American company that manufactures construction and mining equipment. The company operates in a mature and cyclical product market and has underwent various restructuring plans. In the early 1980s and 1990s, Caterpillar was nearly put out of business due to the intense competition it faced. The entrance of Komatsu, a rival Japanese company, threatens Caterpillar’s position in the market. With Caterpillar refusing to lower its premium prices at that time while Komatsu offers relatively lower prices for similar products, the latter was slowly gaining the market
Senior executives at a large, low-cost manufacturer of appliances and white goods were concerned about the sluggish performance of the company’s household fan business. It had long been among the top leading players in the company’s home country—an emerging market—but was now losing domestic share in two important, and fiercely competitive, product categories.
U.S demand for tractors had stagnated due to a recession in the farming industry. Because of lower demand for its big, high-performance machines, USAT has weathered the recession better than had some of its larger competitors. However, during the past year, the order backlog had been completed considering export opportunities, and Mary had been asked to