For this collection of experiences relating to ELCC Standard 2.4, I worked on various tasks regarding both state and district standardized testing. I collected all the available data from TIDE and EdSights for Amity’s and DRG B’s aggregate and disaggregate results on the 2017 state testing (CAPT, CMT, SAT, and SBA). Much of the disaggregate DRG information was suppressed. CAPT and CMT DRG information was not yet released. I downloaded the data that I could obtain into Excel, and then I organized the data into various graphs. These graphs were then shared with my mentor, the Director of Curriculum and Staff Development. We discussed these results in detail and compared them to previous results. Additionally, we reviewed the current …show more content…
For example, a level 2 geometry class may have students in grades 9, 10, 11, and 12 but the 12th graders do not test. I also compiled the STAR results and created graphs to show cohort results for the past three years as well as year-to-year results. I was pleasantly surprised that our students show consistent improvement. The collection and organization of state testing data went very well. My specialties include mathematics and technology, so this is definitely in my wheelhouse. Also, my experience teaching math and using state testing data as part of my job gives me the background knowledge needed to understand the results. My mentor was very pleased with how quickly I was able to produce this information. Luckily, we had the previous year’s Board presentations on the state data, so we were easily able to obtain both the cohort data and the year-to-year data for the last three years. Additionally, the Board goals were freshly revised and aligned nicely to the current data. I had some issues determining which courses had seniors in them for STAR testing. Although I was able to easily access the master schedule from PowerSchool, I had to go into each class one-by-one to identify which classes had seniors and how many seniors were in each class. This task was very time consuming. Another issue was with the rooms. Amity has three computer labs and two Chromebook carts that can be
The wide-spread use of standardized testing in the American education system is not helping anybody. Standardized testing was designed to help schools see how their students were performing academically in standard way. The NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Act made standardized testing tied to school funding. It made the government reward or punish schools based on test scores. It was made to help students stay on track. Instead, standardized testing is lowering the quality of education in the United States. Standardized testing puts stress on students, forces schools and teachers to “teach to the test”, and has not helped the United States in worldwide education rankings.
the next year. Two things strike me here. First of all, it is intolerable that
There once was a time when students were enthusiastic about going to school; However, for many Texas students that couldn't be farther from the truth. The Texas state standardized test was once used as a building block for our children's education, accessing their progression ; however this is no longer the case. Now, our children's education is structured around passing the test, not actually learning the academic curriculum. This test not only takes away from our children's education, but places a magnitude of stress on the students , teachers, and administration. So, is State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STARR) really helping our children?
The Department of Education concludes that high-stakes testing and statewide standards puts too strain on both the teacher and student. Multiple studies show evidence of miscalculation of scores, teachers being blamed for low test score, and too much time spent on preparation for the tests. The purpose of this policy brief is to elaborate on the non-beneficial components of high-stakes testing and statewide standards. Thus, peer-reviewed research articles and evidential articles are reviewed on high-stakes testing and statewide standards. In addition, the state of Florida has shown the greatest amount of dissatisfied outcomes. The information provided in this policy brief will precisely indicate why high-stakes testing and statewide standards should be abandoned from the school system. I request the action of Congress to outlaw high-stakes testing and statewide standards for the betterment of all National citizens by passing a new law to force states away from standardized testing.
Did you know, out of 65 countries 29 did better at the standardized tests than the U.S? Some people support the use of standardized tests and some are against the. I think standardized tests are not a good idea because they overpopulate schools, only test students on part of a subject, and stresses students out.
A never-ending issue has loomed over the head of our nation-- education. According to the Institute of Education Sciences, 63.7% of American students are below proficient in reading and 65.7% in math. In order to improve educational standards and increase student achievement, Congress passed the No Child Left Behind Act (also known as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act) in 2002. Designed to increase the role of the federal government in education, it holds schools accountable based on how students perform on standardized tests. Statistics show that the average student completes about 110-115 mandatory, standardized tests between pre-kindergarten and end of twelfth grade (an average of eight tests per year). Standardized testing utilizes
The test results come back six month after the test is taken so they don't help teachers. Students take the test in May and don’t get the results until September, so the result do so little because the student will have moved on to a new grade
State-mandated standardized testing has lately become a monster to be feared by students from the beginning of their school career. According to well respected educational author Alfie Kohn, “[…] Most of today’s discourse about education has been reduced to a crude series of monosyllables: Test scores are too low. Make them go up” (Kohn 1). Why all the testing? Some is to meet the federal government requirements, some to meet state requirements, some for the district and some for the school, and still more tests are given simply to help students prepare for the ones already mentioned. So much testing has reduced time for instructors to actually teach. In addition, many of the tests neglect to cover all important material,
Howard explains the event in which a new test has been given out to students. The
Purpose: To improve a testing experience for our students to increase the percentage of students meeting the standards of the standardized test.
These tests will provide teachers and administrators a diagnosis of how the school is performing and in which areas the school needs to improve on. This will also inform policymakers which schools are doing well and why. Then that technique can be applied to schools in which the scores were not meeting standards. President Bush and the U.S. Congress have challenged educators to set high standards and hold students, schools and districts accountable for results. (Dept. of Ed, 2004)
Imagine a test capable of making or breaking a student's chances of getting into his or her dream college. Imagine a test score that can be easily influenced, but only through thousands of dollars worth of coaching. Now imagine that same test but biased towards certain crowds of students while also being incapable of accurately predicting their futures. Is this the test you want for colleges to use in order to distinguish students? This is the SAT—famous for the unnecessary pressure it presents to students as well as the unfair disadvantages it presents to many others. Since these SAT scores are extremely artificial, SAT tests are not an accurate predictor for future success.
State mandated testing came about in the mid late 1800’s. It is a assessment shown to see students abilities to learn a specific course and if they know the material. Present day in the United States state test can start being taken from elementary school to college . Trying to show if you have mastered the agenda that was brought over a course . State mandated test should not be required or pushed upon students in an everyday life because of the negative impacts it’s brings along that not only affects students but also teachers causing harm in many ways .
I got my article for the Washington Post. The Washington Post is a credible source because they state facts about events, and spread reliable information that everyone can rely on. The Washington Post article that I chose states many facts about a new law that was passed. The article I chose is, New U.S. rules for standardized testing have been drafted. Here’s what they mean for kid, it states that congress has passed a new federal education law that will replace, No child Left Behind. The replacement is Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). One of the major changes the ESSA will do is changing how students are texted in schools. Standardized testing has always been a topic that has been highly debated upon. Standardized testing has both positives
According to the information above, it is clear that standardized testing is not a perfect practice. Not only does standardized testing not measure all traits, but it isn’t as standardized as some think. A student’s answer to a question also depends on their reading level, a correlation found in multiple studies, according to “The Validity of Standardized Testing in Science,” an article centered upon studies regarding the readability of testing questions. In all, a student incorrectly answering a question doesn’t always mean they don’t know the material. As Visone states in his article, “These students may need alternate test forms or performance-based assessments in order to accurately display their content-area knowledge. In short, one size