In this society, people receive pay for jobs they were hired to complete. Also, many people get paid for services, who normally would not receive pay. One of the great debates has been whether or not college athletes should be paid. Some feel college athletes should be paid, and others believe they should not. College athletes should not be compensated because many athletes already receive scholarships to attend college; they receive goods and services that money would otherwise purchase, and non-athletes who are learning professions at the same university are not paid. Scholarships are awarded to students to help further their education without the worry of having to pay out of pocket for their schooling. A large proportion of student
College athletes should be paid. The athletes put in as much work as the people who do get paid. Why should they not be paid? There are many pros for why they should get paid, but there are also many cons on why they should not get paid. The athletes should get paid because of how hard they work in season and the off-season. Do not pay all of the athletes, but pay the ones who are at a D1 college. The athletes should get paid because they put in the same amount of time as the pros do, and the pros get paid.
In the recent past, college athletics has gained massive fame in the United States. The immense fame of the college athletics has developed over the past twenty years. The massive development and fame of the college athletics have resulted in improved incomes for the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA). Due to increased revenue received by the NCAA, the participates in athletics in the colleges has fuelled the argument of whether the college athletes need to be paid and rewarded more than just the athletic scholarships. In this research paper, I will take a stab at to respond the question whether they should be paid by delving the explanations for and against the payment of the college athletes (Adams and Becky 108).
College sports is a multi-billion dollar industry. Each year thousands of high school students are recruited to play college sports, but under strict conditions. Students are required to do well in athletics while keeping up with their academics. College athletes spend up to forty five hours per week on practices, training, and games. In addition, they spend roughly forty hours on their academics. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletics Association) does not think it is necessary to pay these athletes because they want to maintain the “amateur sport” status. According to Stanley Eitzen in his “College Athletes should be Paid, “The universities and the NCAA claim their athletes in big-time sports programs
While people may have the opinion that college athletes should be paid, the debate for
Some college athletic departments are as wealthy as professional sports teams. The NCAA has an average annual revenue of $10.6 billion dollars. College athletes should be paid because of the amount of revenue that they bring to their college. Each individual college should pay its athletes based on how much revenue they bring to the college in which they attend. The colleges that win their Division title, their Conference title, or the National championship, give bonuses to the Head coach of that team. If colleges have enough money to give bonuses to coaches, that means they have money that is left over for the athlete who gives them recognition to pay them. College athletes should be paid based solely upon the performance and success that they have.
Kim Kardashian’s ex lover is not just famous for dating a “Kardashian”; he was more famous for the controversial issue with the NCAA due to proceeds given to him for his ability on the field. Reggie Bush made a lot of accomplishments while being a college athlete. Because of his skills, he was rewarded an amount of money. While Reggie Bush was playing at the University of Southern California, statistics show that the college generated roughly fifty-five million dollars. That’s a lot of money for one athlete to bring in. Every day we hear more and more stories about NCAA investigators and colleges being punished for “paying” players. However, college athletes bring in a lot of money. Therefore, they should get a percentage whether it is a small amount or a large amount. It will depend on the athletes’ ability. While some may argue that paying college athletes to play is wrong, college athletes have a marketable skill and should be paid for their skill.
Over the last few years there has been renewed controversy about whether college athletes should be paid. The idea of paying college athletes goes back to the early 1900s with one of the first inter collegiate competitions between Harvard and Yale. The modern position of the National Collegiate Athletic Association is that athletic scholarships provide a free college education in return for participating on the university team. Many college athletes dedicate more than forty hours of training per week. College is expensive. How can we expect college athletes to pay for books and other basic necessities if they are busy practicing or participating in home games or traveling to away games? The NCAA needs to start paying these athletes to supplement
This topic became of interest to discuss among college athletes, coaches, sports fans, and colleges due to the impact it could have on their daily lives. With many different views and factors to take into count on this certain issue, it is an ongoing debate rather to pay college athletes or not. Those that believe they should be paid provide different reasoning to support their opinion. On the other hand, people who believe college athletes should not get paid have similar beliefs. College
One of the most controversial subjects we as individuals hear about this day in age is whether or not college athletes deserve to be paid. Many people argue that these athletes do intact, deserve to be paid for their time and hard work. NCAA athletes create a name for themselves by playing and performing well on their college teams. The better these athletes perform, the more publicity the school revives. This then leads to higher ticket sales and stores around campus selling jerseys and other clothing items with athletes names and numbers on the back. NCAA schools have become comfortable with using athletes’ names to bring in a revenue for the school, and yet the athletes never see any of that money. On the other hand, many people believe that these athletes do not deserve, nor should they expect to receive payment in return. They believe that these scholarships and the education are payment in itself. Some even bring up the question on if it is affordable or even realistic to pay college athletes.
While catching up on some game day scores for college football, an article popped up on the side with a title reading, College Athletes Deserve To Be Paid. I noticed it was written by Michael Wilbon, one of the hosts from the ESPN show, Pardon the Interruption. Already disagreeing with the title before even reading it, I was skeptical, but I clicked on the link and started to read. Wilbon brought up a number of decent points throughout the article, but for some odd reason, they didn’t seem to add up to me. This is why I took the opportunity to do a little more research behind the points made in the article and came up with a concept of my own. Wilbon’s reasons why to pay the athletes don’t have a
One of the most popular pastimes in America is watching college sports. Whether it’s football, baseball, or basketball, these student-athletes bring fans, money, and sponsorships to their schools. So why shouldn't these athletes be paid? The answer is that student-athletes should not be paid, because they have the ability to earn scholarships or financial aid, college athletes are paid in other ways than financially, and not all schools have the money to pay them. Ultimately, paying college athletes would ruin the current culture and competitiveness of college sports.
In the course of recent decades, school sports have increased enormous ubiquity over the United States. Whether it be football, ball, or hockey, since the time that the turn of the century, intercollegiate games have acquired an overflow of income to their separate Universities, and in addition expanding the fame of the College 's notoriety. For instance, in a study directed by the Orlando Sentinel, it was assessed that the University of Texas ' Athletic Program had the most elevated income of whatever other University at $120,288,370 (How Much Revenue). Yet with this vast total of cash, no school competitors are lawfully adjusted for their work. As per NCAA rules, "You are not qualified for interest in a game on the off chance that you have ever: Taken pay, or the guarantee of pay, for contending in that game" (NCAA Regulations 1). Because of this law, not just are school competitors experiencing issues in paying off their school educational cost, additionally numerous competitors are being paid under the table through illegal businesses. These novice competitors have no motivation to stay in school and complete their particular degrees, the same number of can 't stand to pay for the undeniably costly school experience. While numerous contend that school competitors shouldn 't be paid as they are just novices speaking to their schools, I contend that competitors must be paid to
Paying College Athletes should be allowed under NCAA rules, because it let’s the athletes know and feel like they are appreciated. Being paid for doing something you dedicate your time to and exceed greatly in there should be a monetary reward. Student athletes in college should be paid for dedicating all their time into the sport, but also well balancing their grades too. Paying the athletes will help the athletes have pocket money and not making them having to make time for a job either.
Rose Bowl to see your favorite player. You might've even bought tickets and wore their jersey to the game. The truth is, you never would've bought that jersey or ticket if they didn't play, so the college company is making huge sums of money off of your favorite players name. Many people believe that at least a small percentage of the money made off merchandise should be given to the players who made it.
Big time college athletes should be paid for their efforts because an athletic scholarship does not cover the full cost of college attendance. (“Study of Scholarship Shortfall Numbers Reveal College Athletes Pay To Play”; Thompson; D’Aquila). While in the recruiting process many high-school athletes are under the impression that they will receive a “full scholarship” for college and won’t have to pay anything (“Study of Scholarship Shortfall Numbers Reveal College Athletes Pay To Play”). However, college athletes often end up paying for necessities such as school supplies and clothing from their own pocket (“Study of Scholarship Shortfall Numbers Reveal College Athletes Pay To Play”). This is partially due to the NCAA setting a maximum