Essay on Control Mechanisms

The control structure is the means used to ensure that organization members are doing what they are supposed to do; it describes the nature of and methods for communication in an organization. Due to lack of a structural job design and absence of coordination within departments and lack of autonomy employees are irresponsible and do not perform the task to

Overall Strength: in general, the article provides structure to a concept that is very intangible by: (a) describing the nature and the functions of control; (b) segregating the MCS into categories: core control system, organizational structure, and organizational culture; (c) illustrating how to apply the control model (satisfied my approach) (d) provides a basis for designing and evaluating the system. The manner, in which the model is presented, with its use of figures, further emphasizes the structure of the model. See below on further emphasis on parts (a) -(c).

Control Theory is the theory of support. This theory demonstrates an individual's social bonds in relation to their performance. Since certain bonds are stronger in certain kinds of lifestyles the affects will be different in all situations. Control theorists believe “in the rationality of the criminal act that the individual behaves in a criminal manner for ordinary reasons, and this behavior arises out of the person’s own free will” (Moyer, 2001, 133). However, deviant behavior is prevalent in today’s society. It is a major problem concerning adolescents all across the world. This theory carries serious paternalistic roles.

ravis Hirschi has dominated control theory for four decades. His influence today is undiminished and likely will continue for years, if not decades, to come (see, e.g., Britt & Gottfredson, 2003; Gottfredson, 2006; Kempf, 1993; Pratt & Cullen, 2000). Beyond the sheer scholarly talent manifested in his writings, what accounts for Hirschi’s enduring influence on criminological theory? Three interrelated considerations appear to nourish the appeal of his thinking. First, Hirschi’s theories are stated parsimoniously. This means that his theory’s core propositions are easily understood (e.g., the lack of

Management Controls are used to put procedures and policies into place that would allow an organization to be able to function in a secure manner from all of its levels, to include the ground floor to the top floor.

whereas externals believe that feedback to be strictly due to forces outside of their control (Schultz & Schultz, 2013). Locus of control is a concept developed by Julian Rotter as part of his own social-learning approach to psychology. Haynes and Ayliffe (1991) utilize a theory of internal and external attribution that parallels Rotter’s locus of control, specifying attribution as an important mental process when addressing self accountability. Internal attribution is behavioral change that is instigated internally by the individual, such as a conscious decision to modify behavior. External attribution is change that is caused by outside factors such as medication or disease (Haynes & Ayliffe, 1991). An excellent example of these concepts is an alcoholic who is told

Our CEO Indra Nooyi implemented the “Performance with Purpose” guideline to help the company and employees make the right decisions. The company has also developed a Code of Conduct that addresses various business ethics issues such as bribery and conflicts of interest. PepsiCo expects the associates to be familiar with the Code of Conduct. The company also created a Chief Compliance Officer position to enforce the Code. In order to maintain our commitment to the communities and assorted stakeholders, the company has high standards for quality. By adhering to processes and ensuring proper governance, PepsiCo attempts to uphold its responsibilities and earn the confidence of stakeholders. To measure its progress and to make certain that it remains focused, PepsiCo has also developed the following six guiding principles that it uses to sustain its commitment. However, my example shows that we face ethical issues or questions even at a company that is established on how to handle unethical behaviors. It is largely at the individual level to act ethically. As we observed in the baby lab video, we are born with the universal moral core as well as the dark side of morality. As we grow older, society trained us to behavior ethically. However, when under pressure, we do regress to our younger selves. When we are faced with pressure and complications, decision making also become extremely difficult. Saying what is the right thing to do is easier than doing the right thing when you are in the situation. In the future, I will weigh in all four methods of ethical reasoning (virtue, interest, rights and duties) during the decision-making process. I believe that having the proper tools and help will guide me in making the right

The Coca-Cola Bottling Company holds true to their values and strategy, thus creating more value within their brand. Business level strategy implements new products that embodies a fun and sociable atmosphere amongst family members and friends. This ambitious quality in a company is what pushes them past the threshold of complacency to move their product. One way they were able manage their brand globally was by using intense advertisements. Adding to their already famous and highly desired beverage, a business level strategy was instituted to add flavors to their cola product. By adding Cherry Coke and Vanilla Coke to their products, they satisfied the taste buds of millions upon millions of consumers here and abroad. Having the corporate level strategy makes the corporation thrive in the global market. It is also viewed as staying relevant or competitive, by developing more products that would best serve everyone who enjoys their product.

Coca Cola has differentiated its product and services that are valued by its customer. Its product are based on customer’s preferences, with affordable price and made easily accessible.

Coca-Cola is “Tall” in terms of organizational complexity. Coca-Cola is controlled through a vertical hierarchy, with decision-making authority residing with the company’s upper management. Daily and routine decisions are made by the line managers at the middle level.

The purpose of this paper is to analyze a case study related to issue of control and how organizations can utilize different approaches of control in order to improve quality and performance in all arenas, domestic and global. The focus of this case revolves around Lincoln Electric, an Ohio based company that has set the bar for how to develop and implement a successful management system. This paper will use the Lincoln Electric case analysis to present recommendations on how managers can use control methods to enhance employee performance, increase employee participation and empowerment, and improve organizational quality in

The Coca Cola Company is very cautious and responsive to change; they act with urgency and have the courage to discourse when needed to work more efficiently. Coke’s focus is to administer its system assets to build values and rewards for the people who take risks by finding better ways to solve problems. Coca Cola Company feels they are accountable for their actions and inactions and hence answerable to the people. They learn from their outcomes and understand what works or what doesn’t for them.

It has taken much more than simply the brand and product to grow Coca-Cola in the number one leader in the soft drink market. Over the past 100 plus years, Coca-Cola has built a huge network of distribution and manufacturing networks. These collaborations that are superior to all others and all types of relationships are a distinctive competency for Coca-Cola. The way that they organize and plan their contracts has proven to be extremely successful and continues to keep Coca-Cola at the top of the market. They have been able to build relationships with suppliers, buyers, bottlers, manufactures, retailers and consumers that are strengthened by the degree of loyalty from both sides of these relationships. They continue to manage their company

The essay describes the key characteristics of Coca Cola Company and how these characteristics are aligned with the organizational behavior. The motivational theories are also discussed in detail which could be useful in managing such a large workforce.

1. Coordination. The size of modern organisations is quite large. A large amount of capital and large number of people are employed in them. This complicates the problem of control as there are many units producing and distributing different products. In order to coordinate their activities, an efficient system of control is necessary.