preview

Coping Cat

Decent Essays

The second study, conducted by McNally Keehn, Lincoln, Brown, and Chavira (2013), analyzes the effectiveness of the Coping Cat program in reducing anxiety in children with ASD. This study is a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants included 22 children, aged 8 to 14 years old, with ASD and at least one anxiety disorder, including separation anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, or social phobia (McNally Keehn et al., 2013). The children were measured for anxiety using the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS) and the parents were given a parallel version to measure their child’s anxiety as well (McNally Keehn et al., 2013). The participants were randomly assigned to either the CBT condition or a waitlist condition (McNally …show more content…

The results also found a decrease in internalizing and externalizing symptoms, as rated by parents (Ehrenreich-May et al., 2014). All of these findings were maintained at a one-month follow-up (Ehrenreich-May et al., 2014). These findings support the BIACA protocol in the treatment of comorbid anxiety in children with ASD (Ehrenreich-May et al., 2014). There were a couple of limitations to this study, however, that should be considered when interpreting these results. The first limitation to this study is that it was an open trial, meaning there was no control group to compare results against (Ehrenreich-May et al., 2014). Other limitations include the small sample size, the short one-month follow-up period, and the sample being primarily males (Ehrenreich-May et al., …show more content…

There was also a significant decrease in unnecessary parental involvement in the self-care tasks of the children (Drahota et al., 2011). There was a greater overall reduction in anxiety severity in those children in the immediate treatment condition versus the waitlist condition (Drahota et al., 2011). These findings were maintained at a three-month follow-up (Drahota et al., 2011). One possible limitation to this study to consider is the fact that most of the data collected came from parent reports, in which the parents were aware of the treatment condition their child was assigned to (Drahota et al., 2011). Another limitation is regarding the sample, as it was skewed towards middle and upper-middle class income families (Drahota et al.,

Get Access