Courtroom Work Group Paper

The prosecutor has more contact with everyone involved with the crime than maybe anyone else. He or she has contact with the person suspected of the crime, the victim, witnesses, and also works alongside the police to investigate and ensure the correct person is held accountable.

My reactions to the courtroom observation is that the court house generates allot of money in fines and get the community allot of committee service. They are a lot more player in the courthouse then the book states. The bailiff and other officers that work in the court house are major players in the functions of the court house as well. The secretary is also very important she or he schedules continuing court dates and handles most of the paper work.

During my two days attending youth court I was in two separate courtrooms. The lay out of these courtrooms was fairly simple. There is a sitting area in each courtroom where individuals can be seated. The individuals seated in this area consisted of the accused parties, witnesses, family of the victims, offenders and general members of the public. There are two stands, one for the defense counsel and one for the crown attorneys. Each side also has a stand for possible accused

* Although the police, judges, defense attorneys, and probation officers remain involved in specific duties, the prosecutor proves challenged in phases of the court process. Prosecutors challenge judicial decisions at times (Byrd, 2001). The office of the prosecutor proves part of the executive branch of the government. In all phases of the court process, given broad discretion, his/her job is to advocate the guilt of defendant vigorously. The prosecutors represent the people. Prosecutor screen the case. They determine if a crime has been committed. They research the crime to examine if a suspect has proved properly identified and if the evidence is sufficient to support a guilty verdict (Schmalleger, 2011).

Positive in a sense where different opinions and arguments being introduced which allows diversity in the court. This frequent interaction creates better courtroom workgroup relationships that reflect the outcomes of trials. Then again, negative in a sense where there is a lack of collaborative effort from all group members to investigate what’s just and fair for defendants and victims. In the reading, the failures from inside the court to challenge certain practices create the negative effects in the criminal justice

They read out that charges, swear in the witnesses, tags evidence, and the paperwork from the crown prosecutor and the defence counsel to the judge. The court recorder types what is going on the said in the trial, word for word. This is for the records and transcripts that may be useful and crucial for future uses. Observers of the public may watch a trail that is being held, but they have to be respectful and quiet during the trial. Courtroom organization is very important and has to be respected as the decisions made inside can deeply positivity or negativity affect someone’s life. It is important to the study of law because it is where citizens have the opportunity to protect their own rights and freedoms listed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Courtrooms are important to our unit about criminal law because criminal cases and trials are held inside. Hence, they are very important to the study of law because it enforces the laws in the Canadian law

On Friday, April, 4, 2014, I observed the Vanderburgh County Superior Court to observe different family law cases. The cases I heard involved contempt of court for failing to pay child support, failure to appear for a court appointed drug test, birth certificate affidavit, request for contest hearing time, and an issue of paternity case. Magistrate Judge Sheila M. Corcoran was presiding over the family court hearings. When entering the courthouse, I was greeted by security and advised to remove any cell phones, and/or, any other items that would trigger a metal detector. After this, I proceeded straight to look for the family courtroom. After roaming around mindlessly for a couple minutes, I decided to ask the courthouse officer monitoring

The courtroom workgroup consists of the participants that work for the court. The workgroup is composed of the judge, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others

ON 09-03-2016 at 0930 hours, I was notified by Sgt Kelley of an aggravated battery which occurred at 2111 Roanoke Springs Drive. I was advised to respond to St. Joseph’s Hospital (South) at 6901 Simmons Loop in Riverview. Upon my arrival, I met with Sgt. Kelley, Deputy Karpenske # 249578 and Crime Scene Tech Dewitt. There was a black 2013 Nissan Maxima bearing Florida tag, DGV F36, parked in the emergency room parking bay. I learned the suspect, Joanna Lebrea Lewis had driven the car to the hospital for treatment of the injuries sustained during the offense. It was learned that verbal consent had been obtained from both the victim and suspect to search their residence and vehicle. It was also learned the victim, Marieio Denod Spradley,

During a trial, there are many rules, procedures, and codes of conduct that must be observed. These are in place to allow a trial to proceed more efficiently and fairly for both the defense and prosecution. According to one author, “Police, prosecutors, and criminal court Judges see too much crime, so they tend to see crime everywhere. We need rules to control their conduct, Judges to carefully apply those rules, and other Judges to review those decisions (law-article.net).” Courtroom procedures are important because, without them, defendants and prosecution alike could be treated unfairly. These procedures give a standard format for trials that must be followed to ensure that all parties have an equal opportunity to present their

The group membership roles (Engleberg & Wynn, 2017) depicted were task, maintenance, and self-centered roles. Juror No. 1 was a coordinator and gatekeeper, Juror No. 2 was a harmonizer, Juror No. 3 was a dominator and attacker, Juror No. 4 was an analyzer, Juror No. 5 was a questioner, Juror No. 6 was an analyzer, Juror No. 7 was an obstructionist, Juror No. 8 was an opinion provider, information provider, and motivator, Juror No. 9 was a clarifier supporter, Juror No. 10 was an obstructionist, Juror No. 11 was a questioner, and Juror No. 12 was an analyzer. Participation problems were faced such as initial communication apprehension by Juror No. 5, passiveness by Juror No. 2, and aggressiveness and

The movie Twelve Angry Men is about the twelve jurors that could adjust their influence in a decision-making process for conviction an eighteen years-old boy, whether the boy guilty or not guilty in murdering of his father. It represents a perfect example for applicable of a work group development framework. It also has examples of influence techniques among a group’s members. This paper is looking at those specific examples in the movie and focusing in analysis the reasons why Juror 8 is so much more effective than others in the meeting.

The first court that I attend was district court, the judge was Fernando r. macias

The courts of the United Kingdom are institutions there are aim justice to all and deliver fair and equal trails. Although ‘fair and equal’ are not always true to some cases along with ‘justice to all’. Never the less either convicting someone for unlawful activity or resolving a civil dispute, the British legal system employs a variety of courts in its application of the law. It much reminds me of my home country the United States the different level of courts I mean. Magistrates courts have the jurisdiction to try minor offences then for more serious offences are referred to the Crown courts. There are also appellate courts, which include the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court; formally known as the House of Lords. To

Whoever conceals his transgressions will not prosper, but he who confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy.