The use of mixed methods is currently increasing in social science research since it emphasizes methodological pluralism, and provides a broader and more credible understanding of the research problem than the use of a single method (Tashakkori and Teddlie 2010). However, mixing methods for no good reason other than the sake of it can produce disjointed and unfocussed research, and can severely test the capabilities of researchers. I raise some cautionary issues in this paper by critiquing the methodology
review: The objective of the review is to improve acute care experiences for student nurses and improve their future practice as a qualified nurse. As well as to identify any research gaps. 2. Methodology: Through the course of this chapter the method used to obtain the literature and the exclusion and inclusion criteria shall be discussed. An account of the selection process for the final papers will be given and it will indicate the critical appraisal tools to be used and the rationale for choosing
start with a question. The next step after knowing the research question is to plan how to conduct the research to answer the question. Bryman (2012) explained that scientists have to form a suitable question that can be applied in quantitative as well as qualitative research. He also indicated research questions as guidance in literature search, data collection, data analysis, and discussion. In other words, research questions keep scientists emphasize their studies, so they do not go off in unnecessary
research reports as the knowledge component of effective nursing practice and includes a title, abstract, introduction, theoretical framework, a specified research question, discussion, methods of data collection, analysis, results, conclusion and references. Whether the research method is qualitative or quantitative, the table of research elements have been completed for five relevant research articles that address individuals with multiple sclerosis and their modifiable lifestyle factors. Furthermore
relationships and their impact on nursing students’ belongingness and learning’ is clear accurate and concise. Parahoo (2006) refers to the title as having little importance on the reliability of the findings. The reader should spend little time critiquing the title, abstract or literature review. It is however, the methodology of the study that determines the quality of research and most attention should be focused on this. Abstract An abstract are defined as being an overview of a study allows
appropriate and useful approach as this method provides the researcher with a greater understanding of the topic and allows the researcher to gain clarity in defining the nature of the research problem (Manerika & Manerika , 2014, p.95). It also helps Byrne define a problem statement for her future research. However, the nature of this approach is associated with significant limitations, which in Byrnes paper, were coupled with problems in the research title and method that affected the believability and
caregivers. A total of 407 family caregiver-patient dyad was randomized into CARE and attention categories. The CARE group was subjected to the test parameters whereas the attention group received unspecified information (Li et al., 2012). This was the method employed as per the abstract. The results yielded non-significant statistical variations on patient or family caregiver and called for an additional investigation on CARE workings and its effectiveness. The stated question seems unambiguous, it is
published in the Journal of Nursing in Critical Care (JNCC). It will examine both the strengths and limitations of the study by weighing various elements of the research undertaken and its value and implication for nursing practice. It will use a critiquing tool by (Ryan, 2007) (see Appendix 1). Evidence based practice (EBP) is to offer the best care possible to individual patients and use professional judgement to determine nursing care in order to improve patient outcome and even save lives (Moule
their practice. The purpose of this paper is to critically appraise a research article titled, Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of a Telephone-based Peer Support Intervention for Maternal Depression by Letourneau, N., et al. (2014) by evaluating and critiquing sections of the study. The objective of this paper is to determine if the study provided valid and reliable information that can be used to implement into nursing practice. Research Problem The research problem the researchers are purposing
disorder (PTSD) and depression, along with physical health issues and functionality with activities of daily living in older adulthood (Maschi et. al., 2013, p. 59). By understanding these effects, we can have an idea of how it occurred and what methods we can utilize for treatment options. Findings Findings of this review did show that direct exposure to traumatic experiences had higher risk of adverse effects to mental health than indirect exposure such as being a witness to violence (Maschi