How did not reporting these details actually affect the situation? Is the censorship the reason these hostages are alive or the cause the standoff was the longest in recent U.S. history? I think this is the question the news editors and executives should have presented to the governor’s office as soon as the request went out. How important do these facts affect the lives of the people involved? Some Arizona representatives are not completely confident in the choice to limit these facts. There is still a question of right to know information versus the minimization of harm. There is a concern that other events either more serious or less serious will always lead to a media blackout and the threat of this becoming a trend. The government did …show more content…
19th. It described how the inmates pulled off this stunt in great detail, their criminal histories, what they were serving for, what weapons they had obtained, the injuries of officers and other employees, names of officers and people involved excluding the ones that had been raped. It stated that Fraley was raped within the first few hours which went against what they said in the first article. This article gave the readers all the information they were itching to have previously. I think it is interesting that they waited so long after the standoff to release it. I think it is also interesting that they released the names of other victims that were beat, threatened and tortured but excluded the rape victims, to me this says that what they experienced was not as traumatic or not as sensitive a topic. I think ethically it would have been better to treat each victim the same. Who knows if this outcome could have been any different if the media had done what they do best and reported the last article first. It is clear that news stations complied with the government’s request, whether or not it was the ethical
Stories sometimes are true and sometimes they are false but it is up to the public to believe in what is right and what is wrong. In this day and age, where information is available at the touch of a mouse, it’s not surprising that the media is a particularly dominant and powerful
Consequently, the political sphere is now being colonised by the media, and politics has begun re-orientating itself to satisfy the logic of media organisations (Meyer, 2002, p. 71). Therefore, the media are active participants in the policymaking process and the ability to stimulate change or maintain the status quo depends on their choice of subject or policy issue and how they frame it. Active investigative reporting attempts to shape policy outcomes, but this does not necessarily mean that it always represents the most successful approach for gaining policy changes (Spitzer, 1993, p. 7). In fact, sometimes passive, straight reporting can have a greater influence on policy choices. When this occurs, media independence is largely bypassed, as the news generated depends solely on the information released (as public relations material) from legitimate news sources. For example, in the United States, White House staff routinely make ‘leaks’ - expressively to influence policy decisions (Davis, 1992, p. 143; Robinson, 2001, p. 948). Robinson noted that journalists regard “leaks… as indispensable to their work” and that they are aware of their use by officials in return for scoops (2001, p. 949).
The purpose of this report is to analyse journalism practices employed in newspaper reporting across different outlets and to analyse if the practice was in line with the media
With six people murdered and 14 people injured, it is apparent that rumors have provoked the violence in Arizona that was actually never present. In the article “Violent Rhetoric and Arizona Politics” by Nathan Thornburgh, that is directive the author aims to convey. He points out that Tucsonan Jared Loughner’s crime occurred in an “overheated political environment” where politicians lied and overstated facts to support their campaigns. Politicians in Arizona attempted to tie the increasing crime rates with illegal immigration and by mentioning stories of beheadings in the desert. In doing so, it was revealed that there was no evidence or statistical data to support that claim. It is believed that Congress Woman Gabrielle Giffords was targeted
When people think of Oklahoma, they usually think about flatlands and waving wheat. The thought of terrorism would never come into mind. This is exactly what the people of Oklahoma City would’ve been thinking if asked about terrorism. Sadly, on the day of April 19, 1995, Oklahoma and the nation was shocked as the unthinkable happened. The rest of the world stood still, and watched as people were rushed from the building. Families received information about their loved ones, and soon learned that they were no longer living. Parents were also sickened by the fact that their children would never be able to go to daycare again. As for the man in charge of this operation, his slow but authorized death was watched by families and friends of the victims. The rest of the nation should’ve been able to view this great punishment along with the families who were affected.
In journalism, an ethical dilemma is a complex issue or situation that often involves an emotional and psychological conflict between moral obligations and duties, in which to obey one would transgress the other. Within the media there are many stories that can be deemed an ethical dilemma; some more so than others. One of the most recent and prominent ethical dilemmas was the worldwide coverage surrounding the shooting of two American WBDJ journalists, Alison Parker and Adam Ward. Despite the fact that the shooter filmed the ordeal clearly showing the two slain journalists being shot, news outlets had picked it up and ran with the story, which ultimately went viral in minutes. This essay will analyse and thoroughly examine the reporting
While many may see investigative journalism as essential and an expression of our first amendment rights, when over sensationalized it can cast a dark cloud over an entire country.
There are many factors to consider before deciding whether or not, a tape showing the death of an umpire in a major league baseball game, should be broadcasted on a Canadian news program. News cast rooms are bombarded every day with stories happening in the local community and around the globe. There are a lot of unforeseen events and accidents that can happen in a day but what makes a story news-worthy? Having a prominent person involved or featuring a story that has a great significance to the public would certainly create a lot interests and attention. In this example however, if a viewer is not all too familiar with baseball, hearing the name “John McSherry” or the word, “umpire” may hold little or no value to them. Not to mention it might be a poor taste or disrespect for his family to show the film on prime time television. This is the type of news that time-restricted and easily distracted viewers wouldn’t pay attention to much as they would to news that carries political, economic, or social weight.
At the time of the Three Mile incident, there were only three major television stations limiting the ability to communicate critical information to as many people as possible. Development of cable television and more channels for people to watch gives the ability to distribute information at an increased rate. This is a great advantage to communicating crisis information to a mass audience.
The job of a journalist has always been highly scrutinized. For years, the question of what and how a journalist should deliver information has been analyzed. However, despite the many theories, it has always been a clear consensus that journalists have an obligation to truth above all. However, there are many cases where a journalist may not know how far to go in order to deliver that truth. Of course, a journalist must always operate within legal limits, however, again some cases have blurred lines. A case that demonstrates these blurred lines between the legal and illegal, as well as the need to deliver truth, is a case between the Rolling Stone and their use of illegal music links.
much-needed justice to the families of the victims. Kenneth Josh, in an article for the Congressional Quarterly Researcher (2010) showed the
The media has been adversely affected by the explosion of information sources. It has become a tedious and cumbersome endeavor to accurately locate information sources that can stand to even the slightest bit of scrutinizing. For those who attempt to report the truth, they continue to find it
The key learning points from the Bundy ranch standoff is that by the police and negotiators remained calm, and refusing to be baited allowed them
Nowadays journalists have the responsibility to report facts as accurately, objectively, and disinterestedly as is humanly possible. ‘’The, honest, self-disciplined, well-trained reporter seeks to be a propagandist for nothing but the truth’’ (Casey, 1944b).
Thousands of our nation's men and women were fighting for their country, yet the media limited the amount of information that they chose to pass on to the public. Each day the media is faced with the choice of making decisions of what news to pass on, when that news could make a significant difference in someone's life, or in the fate of our nation.