Documentary Analysis: Food Incorporated

In the prestigious documentary film, Food Inc., produced by Robert Kenner and founded upon an Eric Schlosser’s book, Fast Food Nation, Mr. Kenner has an intriguing impact on the American consumers of many food products and industries. Throughout the film, viewers and everyday consumers of these various products, visualize what takes place behind the scenes in food factories, contrary to what they may see through forms of advertisement. The documentary generates an image of an “Agrarian America” in a naturalistic way to convey the message of what food production truly consists of. The film uses ethos, pathos, and logos as rhetorical devices to enhance the horrendousness of food production to its audience in multiple ways. Food Inc. provides not only a visual effect on the audience's emotion to portray its message, but uses a variety of commentary scenes from several experts and members within the food industry.

Food Inc. was the real and ugly truth of what America is doing to our food. From what I saw in the movie were companies, the state, and the government slowly destroying a culture. Farming is becoming a dying tradition from what I could see in the movie. Farmers signed a contract from the meat packing companies, however many there are, and are forced to keep their methods of farming a secret from the world. Animals were being abused, locked up in a big facility with no sunlight, and genetically modified just so they can be killed faster. Personally, this movie made me kind of sick but seeing the truth of how people were being treated just made me aggravated. The fact that companies were using illegal immigrants and blaming them for small mistakes

Food Inc, is a documentary made by Robert Kenner, which is based on the book Fast Food Nation, written by Eric Schlosser. Kenner uses a variety of strategies in order to convey the message that our food system harms our health, workers, animals, and the environment, and expresses that many details about the system are hidden from us consumers. The filmmaker uses juxtaposition, emotional imagery, personal interviews, facts and statistics, as well as particular cinematic techniques to achieve his purpose of informing the public about the shocking hidden realities of the food industry. The usage of these strategies makes viewers question where the food they eat every day truly comes from, and question if they can trust the companies which make their food.

Director Robert Kenner’s provocative, Oscar-nominated documentary, Food Inc., looks at the food industry’s harmful effects on human health and the environment. He have taken over all aspects of the food chain in the United States, from the farms where our food is grown to the chain restaurants and supermarkets where it's sold (Food Inc.). In this shockingly informative documentary, sick animals, environmental degradation, corrupted and unhealthy food and obesity, diabetes and other health issues are only the more obvious problems with a highly mechanized and centralized system that promotes efficiency as the supreme value in food production (PBS.org). Food Inc. also tells us about wealth, inequality, globalization, and sustainability. As

Although the movie, Food Inc., has a very similar concept with the book, I believe the movie is just a brief overview that focuses on unveiling corporations’ secrets from their consumers and how they affect individuals and its society. This movie taught me many shocking truth that I still did not know even after I read the book. I learned how corn is one of the main leading ingredients in almost everything. What surprised me even more was that 80% of the items in a grocery store contains corn, including batteries! This is another reason why Americans’ obesity rate has increased rapidly as time elapsed. The fact that corn can be a sugary substance, oil, fuel, and other sorts of things, that are in our food, we tend to buy the most affordable one as well; and as I learned from these two materials, the cheaper the cost, the more negative consequences it will provide you and your

2. the second failure of the U.S law from the movie is overlooking health of the country by allowing big corporation to produce cheap processed food. The movie show different case of health concerns that resulted from eating cheap processed food. From Kevin’s case of dying with E. coli from eating burger and the husband family who have diabetes because of eating cheap food. Government failed to help the families that were looking apologies and justice from big corporations. I would think agency like FDA in charge of the safety of domestic food would assess potential exposure and health risks of cheap processed food before they can be on the market. However, as we saw in the movie, the lobbyists for the big food corporation can help them to bring their commodity on the market with or without assessment of the health risk of their products. Count words: 142

In his documentary film, Food Inc., Robert Kenner strives to divulge the reality of how food gets created in a time where mass consumerism controls peoples lives. Kenners purpose is to uncover how 90% of the foods we eat are chemically enhanced consequently increasing people's desires for them. Furthermore, he attempts to exhibit the cruelty present in the production of the products. To demonstrate this, he filled his documentary with facts, imagery and interviews that causes the audience to be repelled by the food industry and the abhorrent things they have done.

Food Inc., a documentary, coordinated by Robert Kenner (2008) has done their employment if the motion picture has given a voice to an issue and a face to the issue that should be known. Food Inc. what 's more, the Media utilize the apparatuses of social brain research to convince and make its point. Narrative movies are compelling media apparatuses that can be utilized to illuminate, influence, and persuade general society on numerous social points on a constant range of inconveniences and battle of the world. Some well-had documentaries affect individuals who watch them, and this is the thing that the films are they intended to do. Eric Schlosser, one of the film 's co-maker said all that needed to be said in Food Inc., "The industry doesn 't need you to know reality about what you 're eating, on the grounds that in the event that you knew, you might not have any desire to eat it" (Pearce, Schlosser and Robledo, 2008). He reports that ranches don 't raise our sustenance all things considered, it is brought up in manufacturing plants. These multinational organizations don 't need people in general to know how they produce our nourishment. What do this film and my own self-idea need to do with one another? "Who am I?" This investigation of my actual self is an on-going procedure.

Interview/pg. 129: direct questioning of respondents. The film Food Inc. did a good job of having actual farmers provide their opinion on matters within the farm-to-food industry via different styles of interviews. For the most part, these interviews were very much unstructured. The farmers would be walking around their farms or doing ordinary tasks and just either answer the questions asked of them, or simply talk and describe the work they were doing in front of the camera. It is through these types of interviews that the viewers get to really see what happens on the farms and how the farmers feel about such topics that were covered in the documentary. I noticed that almost all farmers who spoke on camera exuded rapport with the camera crew and the known audience. While they knew that any word they said could be published in the media, they trusted the crew enough to speak openly about their opinions most of the time. Those who held contracts with Tyson or other major industry leaders were a little more close-mouthed when asked poignant questions. The most interesting thing I noticed on the topic of interviews, was that the owners and managers of the animal processing plants almost always refused to be interviewed on camera. They knew better than to let their secrets out and then as a would be consequence, ostracized by the public. The public backlash would be incredible, sales would plummet, and the brand loyalty that many households had would also fall by the way side. Because of these declining interviews, the manufacturing sites refused to be placed under a case study. Instead, we the public must continue to be in the dark as to what actually happens to the animals that are processed for the foods we eat. Perhaps one day, someone’s tongue will slip and we will know the truth about what goes on behind the doors of these major industrial leading companies.

I chose the film “Food Inc.”, it was a documentary film released on September 7, 2008 directed by Robert Kenner. I watched the film on Thursday, July 9, 2015, I watched it on my computer and I was watching it at home. The filmmaker, Robert Kenner showed us the truth about our nation’s food industry. And the industry doesn’t what us to know the truth about what we are eating because if we knew we won’t want to eat it. He brings us into farms and the slaughterhouse where they grow bigger breasted chickens and grow chicken too fast that the chicken could not walk properly. He showed us foods that are fed to the cow contains toxic chemicals and creates perfect pork chop. Also, everything we have done in modern agriculture is to grow faster, fatter,

An article talking about Food Inc. talks about the organization of the film saying, “The film is divided into chapters that focus on different problems relevant to the current food system: diabetes and obesity, food borne illness, factory farming, genetic engineering, farm worker protection, pesticides, cloning, environmental impact, and the global food crisis” (381-2 Lindenfeld). By dividing the storyline into different chapters like this, the filmmakers can ensure that they present a multitude of issues that appeal to a wide number of viewers without getting bogged down on details that could make people uninterested. Food Inc. is able to give the broad brushstrokes on all of these topics. If a viewer is interested in learning more about a certain issue, they can do it on their own time.

This documentary manages to reflect the reality of humanity today, but is hidden before our eyes for us to continue living in a world dedicated to consumerism and "all for the rich - little for the poor." Thus reflect Food Inc. allows human beings, exposing issues like the handling of animals, genetic modifications made daily, indiscriminate overuse of antibiotics, violations that exist immigration laws affecting workers, constant epidemics of diseases and the increasing rate of people suffering from obesity due to their inability to buy healthy food, the little time available because of their work schedules, or simply the variety of engineered foods, which can be extracted very few nutrients. These are just some of the aspects that presents Food, Inc. to demonstrate how corrupt practices in food production are favored daily, passing over the health of consumers and welfare of animals and natural resources.

The American food industry is a complicated field. There have been various attempts to investigate how the agribusinesses manage to produce food for such a large population. The companies involved in the industry have to resort to any means necessary to produce food that is enough to feed the population. The filmmaker, Robert Kenner, investigates the industry and the practices they undertake to produce food through a 2008 documentary titled Food, Inc (Lindenfeld 385). The film shows the immoral practices by the company that result in unhealthy food being produced and sold to unsuspecting customers. The practices also have a negative effect on the environment, the animals, and the workers employed by these firms. This article examines the film to establish some of the arguments made and the moral concerns raised.

Food Inc is a documentary directed and written by Robert Kenner along with co-writers Elise Pearlstein and Kim Roberts in 2008 to discuss the current origin of food production in the United States. This film takes viewers inside the slaughter houses, farms and factories that produce American food to show how food in the 21st century is no longer organically grown and raised for healthy eating. Instead it is now controlled, mutilated, and produced in large quantities by multi-million dollar companies in order to meet the demands of the fast food industry for profit. Food Inc provides an inside glance of how the owners and workers of these production locations have demands placed on them by these large companies to meet certain standards in order to keep their jobs or contract. Kenner goes on to show how safety and health risk are at the bottom of the priority list while producing more product at cheaper faster rates seems to be at the forefront for these corporations.

For this Review Assignment, I chose to view Food, Inc. This documentary looks at the food industry’s harmful effects on human health and the environment. It was full of all sorts of facts and figures. It was almost as if the director and producers were trying to use scare tactics or fear factors. While I am sure that all the statistics in the documentary were true, they were also rather one-sided. I know there is likely more evil than good in the food industry, I bet there at least a few good things that they could have talked about. I think this documentary tried to focus on a few too many topics in an hour and a half. While I get why they did that, to inform us of a wide variety of things taking place in the food industry, it seemed slightly