Does High Job Satisfaction Increase Performance?

Job satisfaction: ensuring that employees are supported and feel confident in undertaking their duties; providing task variety and achievable targets to promote fulfilment

Organizations that are serious about making improvements are going to have to deal with the issue of job satisfaction. Job satisfaction can be best described as the positive feeling that an individual has about their job resulting from an evaluation of the job’s characteristics (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p.31). It would seem natural to think that job satisfaction would have a positive correlation with successful organizations. What impact does job satisfaction have on an organization? Research will show that there are not only internal effects from performance related issues, but also external effects that impact customer satisfaction.

Job satisfaction is a very simple concept in organizational behavior. It is simply a yes or no question. Is an individual satisfied with their current employment.

After analyzing this organization, it is apparent to that job satisfaction should be a priority for management. Job satisfaction can be best understood as a positive emotional state resulting from a perceived satisfaction from one’s job (Locke & Lathan, 2007). Employee satisfaction is an important retention strategy based on the knowledge that a satisfied employee is more effective in completing their duties, more productive, and seldom contemplates alternative employment. Achieving a goal of a high employee satisfaction rate consist of implementing compensation and reward strategies mentioned prior. It should be emphasized that employees, regardless of industry respond in a positive manner to positive recognition. Positive recognition can be achieved with more than compensation and rewards. Creating an atmosphere where employees feel like their ideas and opinions matter can be just as effective as monetary and non-monetary rewards. A routinely exchange of ideas

The Value Percept Theory argues that job satisfaction depends on whether a job supplies the things an individual value most. Overall satisfactions derive form combined levels of satisfaction from various elements of an individual’s job, whether it’s: pay, promotion, supervision, coworkers, or the work itself. Job satisfaction is based on cognitive and affective components, which is evaluated by what an individual thinks about the job, and how they feel. Cognition evaluation is based on experiences, weighing different aspects of a job; as affect is a reaction of the job, which can fluctuate based on moods and emotions. Level of dissatisfaction is measured by the difference between what one has and what one wants, and the level of importance of that facet to the individual. Statistics have proven, that supplying individuals with what they value, will increase the chance of better performance, which has a high correlation with an individual’s affective commitment with the organization.

Job satisfaction comes from the attitude that employees have towards their work. There is a close relationship between the degree of satisfaction and the motivation level of employees. Explaining that if there is a lack of motivation in the workplace, it is likely due to a lack

Four articles have been critically analysed to conclude that job satisfaction is the most common cause of behavioural changes in the workplace (Chang, Daly, Hancock, Bidewell, Johnson, Lambert, & Lambert, 2006; Chang, Bidewell, W., Huntington, Daly, J., Johnson, Wilson,

Through-out this essay the notion of satisfied employees being more productive will be broken down and examined, taking into consideration research and theories, to determine if there is any correlation between the two elements, and if so, to what extent. Locke (1976) defines “job satisfaction as pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experience… a perception of how well their job provides those things that are viewed as important.” The feeling of satisfaction is an attitude, “a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour” (Eagly and Chaiken, 1993) favour being the satisfaction the employee feels. “While in its purest

The positive or negative assessment on one’s position within a company can be expressed through the level of job satisfaction an employee experiences. Job satisfaction, which is how employees feel about their job, or aspects of their job, plays a key role in how employees act within a corporation (Locke,

Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences. It has been treated both as a general attitude and satisfaction with five specific dimensions of the job: pay, the work itself, promotion opportunities, supervision, and coworkers. Challenging work, valued rewards, opportunities for advancement, competent supervision, and supportive coworkers are dimensions of the job that can lead to satisfaction (Nelson & Quick, 2013, pg.

After accompanied a research about employees’ job dissatisfaction in general companies and for Delta Company, I have recognized some proofs based on questionnaire and articles. There is a level of job satisfaction for each individual and each job performed. These problems happen when people are not happy with their jobs. This research will support or help the company to increase their employees’ satisfaction level of their job. As we found employees’ were dissatisfied in almost all areas, while a few of employees satisfied ratios were approximately of employees’ dissatisfaction ratios, but still less than employees’ dissatisfaction.

Job satisfaction can be explained as a feeling of pleasure that one feels with his work, it is fulfillment of one’s needs and desires from his or her work and the environment of work.

In this essay, I will explore the relationship between the level of employee satisfaction and employee production. Firstly defining and explaining satisfaction and job performance as these variables are difficult to define, and a clear definition is critical for assessing the relationship between them. Secondly I will discuss some of the most significant studies in this area of research. I will then analyse various factors which determine the correlation between these two variables, focusing on the attitude-behaviour relationship as this gives an insight into how a higher level of satisfaction may link to greater production. Finally I will look into a set of different models which propose variations to the job satisfaction-performance

Job satisfaction is very critical for both workplace growth as well as employee’s growth, but if the employee is not happy what he or she is doing, than that would hurt employee’s performance, and hurt employer’s well-being. Information technology has become one of the most prominent sectors in employing employees as well as creating new jobs in the markets all around the world. It seems like Information Technology has taken over all the fields of work out there. Along with the growth in the Information Technology in the market, the professionals have not grown in the same ratio. As the field of employment has grown, Information Technology workers job satisfaction is a very

Job satisfaction is the very important factor in general quality of life because it is closely connected with working life (e.g. Argyle, 1989; Bang & Lee, 2006), with family life, everyday life, and mental health (Orpen, 1978; Schmitt and Bedeian, 1982; Faragher, Cass & Cooper, 2005). Level of job satisfaction is also highly related to turnover, absenteeism rate, work productivity or accomplishment (Muchinsky, 1977; Organ, 1977). Many researchers (e.g. Cherrington, 1994; Acorn, Ratner & Crawford, 1997; Ostroff, 1992; Spector, 1997) state that employees who experience high job satisfaction contribute to organisational commitment, job involvement, their physical, mental health and overall well-being are improved. Job dissatisfaction on the