Ethical Issue In Information Systems Essay

In his paper, Fried writes that trust is bought through “moral capital” (Fried 484). This moral capital is bought by revealing information that might otherwise be kept private to a friend, loved one, or individual whose trust the informer would like to gain. Moral capital is the trust that an individual will treat another with morality meaning, according to Fried, that they will“[respect] the basic rights of the other” (Fried 479). Fried also states that, “There can be no trust where there is no possibility of error,” suggesting that without privacy there can be no trust as privacy creates the risk of confidential information being disclosed by the receiver of said information (Fried 486). The idea that privacy creates trust has only become more evident with the rise of the internet. In their paper, “Young people online and the social value of privacy,” George Mason University professor Priscilla Regan and University of Ottawa professor Valerie Steeves explore how young people’s understanding and value of privacy has been shaped by the internet. The two found that while young people understand that information posted on the internet can be viewed by family members and the public, they trust that others will follow the unwritten social rules of the internet–essentially that they will act with morality–and respect their privacy by not looking at posts not directed at them (Regan and Steeves 302). This example shows that despite the interconnectedness

The Patriot Act. Signed by George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, this act provided the government permission to spy on Americans. NSA can now monitor phone calls, emails, bank and credit report records, and Internet activity.

The Uniting and Strengthening America Act by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act: this is the acronym of the generally known USA Patriot Act. The Patriot act was presented on October 26, 2001 by George W. Bush after the terrorist attack of September 11. This act was implemented with the intended end goal that by giving power to the Justice Department regarding domestic and international surveillance of electronic communications, it would help prevent incidents like September 11 from occurring again (WhatisUSApatriotAct). The Patriot Act was intended to help government agencies fight against terrorism by catching it before it happens.

Spying on American citizens is now a common method employed by the government striving to protect the nation from terrorist attacks. Nonetheless, since its incorporation, the Act has been controversial as politicians and citizens alike have argued between the need to keep society safe and abusive powers of the government over its citizens. Although, mandated to serve as

Congress, in an attempt to address the shortfalls in our counterterrorism system, drafted the USA PATRIOT Act. The law did close many policy gaps, but it also unintentionally infringed upon the civil liberties of the very citizens it was designed to protect. The most contentious parts of the act were the changes in search warrant procedures, unlimited access to records, and wiretap procedures.

The government is also always adding new ones to even further enforce what the NSA cannot do. The government placed new limits on the monitoring of foreign leaders and ordinary non-Americans; and supporting new encryption standards and technologies. Meanwhile, in Congress, two bills that would forbid the NSA from collecting phone data on Americans not suspected of a crime are new to the process. The USA Freedom Act, which reforms the Patriot Act to address privacy concerns, had enough support to pass. Still, many Democrats and Republicans say the NSA programs are needed counterterrorism tools that have proved effective in preventing future

Since the USA Patriot Act was signed into law, multitudes of Americans have voiced their opinions over the matter. Many have ascertained that the law violates our rights under the constitution. This is a valid response to the new law, however, the provisions passed by Congress and the President, helps to cut off the support networks that make terrorism possible. Monitoring of terrorist type activity should not be thought of as an invasion of citizens privacy, it is a

The issues raised by Bennett illustrate that the Internet is still in its infancy in terms of how it is best-integrated into society and regulated by the same ethical, social, and legal principles as traditional forms of communications. It is likely that the solution lies, not in the evolution of regulations or in limitations on free speech; rather, the solution is likely to evolve naturally as subsequent generations develop a better and more nearly comprehensive understanding of how to integrate their offline and online identities in ways that maintain their privacy. Meanwhile, the deeper explanation of the contemporary digital communications

Laws governing surveillance were originally issued by the government to protect the country from terrorists. Yet, critics argue that the NSA program has not helped prevent any terrorist attacks (Elliott). On the contrary, statistics from propublic.org show that fifty-four failed terrorist attacks were identified by the NSA surveillance program. Of that fifty-four, thirteen of them were in the United States (Eliott). Since 9/11, a total of fifty terrorist attacks on U.S. have been thwarted (Carafano). By those numbers, twenty-five percent of terrorists attacks targeted toward the U.S. were foiled because of the NSA. According to heritage.org, between 2001 and 2009, a total of 471 terrorist attacks were against the United States (Carafano). The statistics show that the government needs more help in identifying terrorists. In addition, the government has said that the

But surely everyone in the united states are not potential terrorist And also, the NSA has no record of stopping any terrorist attacks. Yet there were plenty of terrorist attacks and cases across the US since the attack on the Twin Tower and some plots before 9/11 that the NSA did not discover. On this link there is a book that goes in to more detail http://politicalscience.osu.edu/faculty/jmueller/since.htm. For example, the terrorist attack in New York on September seventieth and eightieth. So if the NSA were doing it’s job these events should not have occurred whatsoever. The government has convinced the nation that if you let us gather your information you will be safe. But this has all been proven invalid. The NSA has been simply gathering our information just to add to their data

Over the past decade the world has gotten much smaller due to the electronic communication the Internet has fostered. While this promotes business and international relations, problems arise regarding the protection of individuals’ personal information. Many countries around the world have developed privacy policies and laws protect an individual's information in the realm of electronic communication. Universal enforcement gets complicated because the Internet is not restricted to one country; it’s worldwide. As a result, concerns arise regarding the compatibility of various countries' privacy policies. This paper will discuss the current legislation in place for various major

The concern about privacy on the Internet is increasingly becoming an issue of international dispute. ?Citizens are becoming concerned that the most intimate details of their daily lives are being monitored, searched and recorded.? (www.britannica.com) 81% of Net users are concerned about threats to their privacy while online. The greatest threat to privacy comes from the construction of e-commerce alone, and not from state agents. E-commerce is structured on the copy and trade of intimate personal information and therefore, a threat to privacy on the Internet.

With the advent of mobile phones, iPad and other smart technology, accessing information across the web has become very easy. You can sit at home and pay your phone bills, or talk to someone from across the world. Along with these benefits, it has also become easier to get access to information that would otherwise be restricted. In recent years, debates have taken place regarding the concern of the privacy of information that is uploaded on the internet, or that is taken from it. This research paper aims at comparing the controversies that surround the concept of privacy in the digital age.

Information gathering, through networking, social media, and both on and offline storage have made it easier to collect information about an individual than ever before, with many concerns having arisen over the years about privacy and the ability to protect that privacy. As debates over personally identifiable information continue, one cornerstone remains a constant, ethics. Ethics are defined as “the standard by which human actions can be judged right and wrong (Online, 2012)”, but even that can be debated when discussed within the realm of information technology. Have you ever been to an internet shopping site and “trusted” the secure connection? Essentially, you are entrusting an inanimate system developed by an individual or group

Privacy concerns on the web have become an undesirable consequence that people face with cyber technology. The ability of computers to gather and store unlimited amount of information from the internet raises privacy issues concerning an individual’s informational privacy. A person’s right to informational privacy is the ability to control the flow of their personal information, including the transfer and exchange of that information. An invasion of informational privacy denies people the right to control who accesses their personal information. Many internet users are unaware that they are more likely to compromise their privacy when using the internet services such as search engines and social networking sites. The internet provides access to an incredible amount of information from all over the world. Some internet users use the internet exclusively as a source of information while other internet users use the internet to create and disseminate information for others to use. However, the vast amount of information floating on the internet would not