Evaluation Of A Standout Among The Most Vital Drivers Of Student Learning

|assessment as a process of making judgments of learners’ knowledge, skills and competence against set criteria |

I am a strong believer that one test defines a students. Therefore, variety is key when assessing students. When using formative assessment I use student reflections, journal entries, exit cards in addition to non verbal communication such as thumbs up or down. I also make anadotal notes on students to help assess the overall learning journey of the student. When using summative assessments, I use district assessments, state assessments, portfolios, short answer, multiple choice, and student based projects. In all forms of assessments, students are provided the appropriate accommodations. My learning goal for assessing students is to have a valid assessment that demonstrate the student’s understanding of the specific skill. It is crucial that I understand the purpose of the assessments and the content that is being taught, therefore, I often start instruction with the assessment piece in

These assessments offer a better view of true student learning than standardized tests. Students must be able to to think and work together to find a solution as opposed to the multiple guess tests used to measure student achievement. To truly understand what knowledge students possess and own the assessment must be able to evaluate true student

Initially in this assignment, I intend to describe and evaluate two different assessment methods, which I use to assess the progress of my learners.

An evaluation was achieved by interviewing the students after they completed their assessments. The interview questions were open-ended in order to facilitate a conversation regarding their feelings and thoughts regarding the various assessments they took. What they felt they learned about themselves, were the assessments informative and how will they use the information they learned about themselves to further their education, possible course selection and academic

The assessment method must take into account the characteristic of the learner and needs to be consistent and relevant to what is being assessed. The assessment will not only focus on improving the learning, it will measure their achievements and also remind the learner of how they are progressing.

This section of this essay critically evaluates the use of two different assessment activities used to check the learning of students. This will be done by considering the key strengths and weakness of each type of assessment will also be considered, as well as, the Validity; Reliability; Sufficiency; Authenticity and Relevance of each assessment method.

Assessment is the process of establishing the nature and quality of our students’ learning and measuring whether learning has actually taken place. Assessment is a key part of the teaching cycle because it enables us to measure achievement against set standards in order to ascertain if our trainees have acquired the skills and knowledge needed at a given stage of training, to diagnose learning needs and to select for further training. It is also the means by which we measure learning at the end of a course and certificate achievements.

Many different types of tests can be “standardized” in the same way. Test specialists consider the standardized tests to be a fair and objective methods of assessing the academic achievement of students, mainly because the standardized format, coupled with computerized scoring, reduces the potential for favoritism and subjective evaluations. Standardized tests could be used for different educational purposes. As an example, they could be used to determine the student’s academic performance and identify students who need academic support and place students in different course levels or award diplomas. Assessment tests are one forms of standardized tests and it has been designed to measure the skills and knowledge students learned in school, and determine the academic progress they have made over a period of time. For example the assessment test students need to take at the beginning of the first year of college or university. The assessment tests can be used to identify the academic placement for a student too. For educational purposes they can be used to hold schools and educators accountable for educational results and student performance, to evaluate whether students have learned what they are expected to learn, to determine if they have met learning

The goal of educational assessment is to record, evaluate and enable improved student learning. The monitoring of student work, through developing understanding of key subject concepts and their achievement of syllabus objectives requires comparison against outcomes and standards. These outcomes and standards help define the criteria which is considered essential and relevant for assessment. Through correct implementation, integration, and reliability and validity, all forms of assessment should enable improved student learning when teaching is targeted towards syllabus outcomes, objectives and through highlighting gaps in student knowledge.

The importance of formal written assessment is always debatable has now become controversial. With many people claiming that assessment though the written exam is valid, while other reject this notion and argue that it is invalid. The substantial interface of formal written assessment has spared the controversy over the potential impact on this trend in recent years. In my opinion, formal written assessment is valid as all students are assessed on the same level. This essay with further elaborate both positive and negative effects of formal written assessment and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.

Standardized tests have been proven not only to fairly test the knowledge of a student, but also to accurately reflect on his or her application of this knowledge. The use of the multiple-choice format is effective in avoiding subjectivity or bias towards grading these exams. A recent study in 2011 said that over 90 percent of studies proved standardized testing to be beneficial on student

Before diving into my perspective, the terms assessment and testing need to be defined. The textbook, Educational Testing and Measurement states that several people are now replacing the word testing with assessment as it does not have such a negative connotation attached to it nor does it sound as evaluative. The authors of the textbook use these terms interchangeably, and that is how they will remain throughout this paper. However, it is important to note the difference in testing/assessment and the assessment process. In most cases, testing and assessment indicate a single measure. Each play a small role in the assessment

The assessment looks at the wide variety of methods that educators use to evaluate and determined the achievement of the student’s educational need. The focus of this essay is to look at the Criterion-Referenced Tests (CRT) and the Norm-Referenced Tests (NRT) usage to see why the Criterion-Referenced Tests should be used rather than the Norm-Referenced Tests. The learning standards and the curriculum will be discussed to help determine why the CRT should be used rather than the NRT. Also, we will take a look at the principal use of how the two methods differ by one using survey testing and the other mastery testing. I will give my informed opinion throughout the essay.

This study is anchored on several theories on the need to assess students’ performance such as Knowledge Assessment Evaluation Theory, Blooms Taxonomy and Theory of Evaluation; theories supporting the use of authentic assessment methodologies in Mathematics such as Meaningful Learning Theory, Social Learning Theory, Cognitive Theory, Skinner Operant Conditioning and Social Constructivist Theory; and theories and educational reforms on which authentic assessment methodologies in Mathematics are grounded.