Evaluation Of The Role Of Formative And Summative Evaluation

801 WordsNov 5, 20154 Pages
Evaluation Evaluation is central to clinical supervision to perform as gatekeeping functions that require responsibility placed on supervisors (Bernard and Goodyear, 2014). Evaluation provides clear distinction between counseling and supervision (Inskipp, 1996). Distinction between formative and summative evaluation is key when supervising (Bernard and Goodyear, 2014). Formative evaluations provide direct and observational skill based feedback through weekly documentation for supervisors to assess supervisees’ effectiveness as a professional in training (Bernard and Goodyear, 2014). Summative evaluations provide an overall picture to decide whether goals and progress met standards and expectations of supervisors (Bernard and Goodyear, 2014). Summative evaluations used mostly in educational settings, seek to make decisions among supervisees. In conjunction with supervisors and education coordinators making decisions about the supervisee, the amount of time invested filling out evaluations is crucial to present clear and distinct assessments for those being evaluated (Bernard and Goodyear, 2014). Supervisee Evaluation As evaluation involves supervisees and supervisors, budding practitioners have difficulty being honest for fear of failure by supervisors. This fear can in turn create anxiety that leads to low self-efficacy thus, less utilization of advanced skills for distress in being evaluated (Timm, 2015). Utilizing person-centered counseling techniques to ease
Open Document