preview

Evidence Critique Essay

Decent Essays

As well, Sand-Jecklin & Sherman (2014) found favorable findings on changing to bedside report. In their study, they noted that adopting bedside reporting facilitated enhanced accountability assurance and increased the extent to which patients are involved in care provision. In relation to time consumed, Sand-Jecklin & Sherman (2014) also found that the method utilizes positively reasonable time. In their surveys, a major observation notable relating to bedside reports was that the comments were largely positive. Of relevance to patient satisfaction, the response that bedside reports kept the patients informed and enabled them to have good explanations of their condition. Worth noting, Sand-Jecklin & Sherman (2014) noted an aspect that is likely to be counterproductive. Among the respondents, they noted the respondent who raised he complaint that bedside report tend to compromise patient privacy. Evidence Critique Taking into account that the recruitment and selection procedures that the study …show more content…

Thus, the choice by Richmond, Merrick, Green, Dinh, & Iedema (2011) to report p-values and confidence values (CI) in establishing the significance of the results assists in enhancing the reliability and validity of the study. Whereas, Tobiano, Chaboyer, & Mcmurray (2012) adopted thematic analysis in data analysis, which facilitated flexibility while maintaining research rigor. The straightforward nature of the thematic analysis also contributes in enhancing the validity of the provided evidence. In the case of Sand-Jecklin & Sherman (2014), the presentation of the findings in terms of means, standard deviation (SD), p-values and degree of freedom (df), coupled with the use of tables in presentation facilitated easier understanding of the values and identification of any trend likely to emerge. The presentation was critical in improving the validity of the findings

Get Access