In your grievance appeal filed at Cook Unit, you claim you were not allowed to e-file your court documents. You further claim your access to the courts is being hindered by staff. You are requesting to be reimbursed for the cost of mailing the documents to the court. Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden’s response is affirmed. The Cook Administration investigated your claim and found your documents were E-filed. You have not provided and evidence to substansiate your claim that staff are hindering your access to the courts.
There has always been a need for conflict resolution on the job. The grievance and arbitration process is one way for employees to be heard when conflict on the job arises. The grievance and arbitration process is also a way for employees to obtain some type of satisfaction at the end of the grievance process. Having representation by the union often guarantees an employee a fair, just, and timely grievance process. However, not all employees feel that way when they are not a represented the union. The grievance process can mean different things to each individual employee and usually no two complaints are normally about the same type of issue.
1st Step - Workers should put their grievance, preferable in writing, to their immediate line manger. Where the grievance is against the line manger the matter should be raised with a more senior manger. If the grievance is contested the manger should invite the worker to attend a hearing in order to discuss the grievance and should inform the worker of his/her statutory right to be accompanied depending on the nature of grievance. The manger should respond in writing to the grievance within a specified time (e.g. within five working days of the hearing or, where no hearing has taken place, within five working days of receiving written notice of the grievance.
in the event that the employee feels their grievence has not been resolved properly they may then appeal in writing to a more senior manager or to a director of the company within 5 working days of the decision. then after this request a more senior manager or adirectorshall make arrangements to hear the grievance at an appeal meeting. following the meeting, the senior manager will respond to the grievance as soon as possible, within five working days. the employee will be told in writing by the companys decision and the final stage of the grievance and the companys decision shall be final.
This appeal involves a dispute regarding the interpretation of overtime pay provisions outlined in the Howard County General Pay Plan (“HCGPP”). Appellant, Lynda Neser (“Neser”) contends that she was deprived of compensation to which she was entitled under certain provisions of the HCGPP. Neser filed a grievance with the Howard County Personnel Office. A personnel officer denied Neser’s grievance. Neser then appealed the personnel officer’s decision to the appellees, the Howard County Personnel Board (“the Board”). The Board adopted the findings of the personnel officer and affirmed the denial of Neser’s grievance. Neser then filed a petition for judicial review in the Circuit Court for Howard County. The circuit court affirmed the
Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden's response is affirmed. You failed to provide the necessary documentation to prove Inmate Wells 187589, should have been added to your Do Not House With list prior to your arrival at the Buckley Unit on 11/21/2016. It is your responsibility to ensure that all appropriate documentation is submitted, so your Do Not House With list remains current.
Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to Department Order 803 INMATE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Bureau Administrator's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 903 INMATE WORK ACTIVITES
Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden’s response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 905 INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT/MONEY SYSTEM
An employee requested to have meal money paid in cash rather than on his paycheck. There is a 1995 agreement between the Company and Local 160 stating that employees have the option of receiving their meal money in cash or on their paycheck however past practice for the last 10 years has been to pay meal money on an employee’s paycheck. Local 160 filed for arbitration and the hearing was scheduled for Sep. 30. The employee initiating this grievance is no longer in the Logistics area. As a result, Local 160 is no longer interested in bringing this grievance forward to arbitration and has withdrawn the grievance. The arbitration hearing has been canceled.
Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden’s response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 902 INMATE LEGAL ACCESS TO THE COURTS
This letter is to inform you that our department will not attend Megan Haertel’s, appeal number 16-032628, telephone hearing scheduled for 12/12/16. We do not wish to protest her claim.
Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office. The mailroom staff from Lewis Complex has confirmed that the book sent in from your brother was delivered to you on 03/03/2017.
*When Dolly and Dan suggested staying on there regular shift 5:00 am. to 1:30 pm. during the summer instead of 7:00 am. to 3:30 pm. appeal denied
Document1THE GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 1.docxTHE GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE
Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden's response is affirmed.