"Classical Management" comprises three different approaches:
- Scientific Management (associated with the work of F W Taylor);
- Bureaucratic Management (hierarchical structure associated with the work of M Weber);
- Administrative Management (associated with the work of H Fayol).
The "Human Relations" approach is associated with the work of E Mayo and F Roethlisberger. Immediately, we can see a difference between the ideas of Taylor and Fayol and those of Mayo as they are even classified differently. In order to explain how these managerial ideas differ, I will first explain what those ideas were.
Taylor
Taylor developed the four scientific principles of management:
1. Development of a true science
2. Scientific selection of the
…show more content…
Differences
Classical Management (CM) attempted to apply logic and scientific methods to management of complex organisations. Human Relations Management (HRM) focused on working relationships to improve productivity.
Fayol and Taylor both emphasised the production process and adjusted humans to this process, whereas Mayo emphasised the coordination of human and social elements in an organisation through consultation, participation, communication and leadership.
CM emphasised the work of the individual, HRM viewed work as a group activity.
Although moving in the right direction, Mayo merely replaced "rational economic man" with "emotional social man", shifting the blame for poor performance from structural to personal attitudes and emotions.
Both approaches mistakenly held that there was "one best way" to manage all organisations.
Relevance of Classical Management theorists today
Taylor's work saw the introduction of time studies, work studies and industrial engineering, making an important contribution to the central procedures of many organisations. The modern assembly line is just one legacy of Scientific
Classical organizational theory supports two views. Scientific management which focuses on managing work and employees and administrative management which addresses issues which
This paper analyzes five great management theorists: F. W. Taylor, Max Weber, Mary Parker Follett, and Douglas McGregor. Each theorist will be compared by four management functions: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling as detailed in the textbook: The Essentials of Contemporary Management-Sixth Edition from Gareth Jones and Jennifer M. George. We begin by discussing commerce prior the industrial revolution and then we define the key management functions, followed by an examination of each theorist, applying a template of analysis and critique.
The classical or traditional approach to management was generally concerned with the structure and the activities of formal organization. The utmost importance in the achievement of an effective organization were seen to be the issues such as the establishment of a hierarchy of authority, the division of work, and the span of control.
These theories were proven relevant by their popularity (Brooks, 20) “Taylor’s thinking preceded the widespread adoption of mass production techniques, possibly best demonstrated by the early 1920’s motor manufacturers, most significantly Henry Ford in the USA.” Production lines were sequential and followed a strict rule of the “one best way” which may be because the new industry and workers did not have a large amount of knowledge or expertise on how their jobs should be done.
Initially at Ford motors, production used to take place by keeping the vehicle at one position and making the workers move in and about gathering the several parts together. This method unfortunately was a very tedious and time-consuming process. In view of this fact, Henry Ford appointed Taylor to monitor the operations taking place. Ford applied the scientific management
Compare and contrast the management theories of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo and Douglas McGregor. In what sense(s) are these theories similar and/or compatible? In what sense(s) are these theories dissimilar and/or incompatible? How would a contingency theorist reconcile the points of dissimilarity and/or incompatibility between these approaches?
The management of people in an organization is an important factor of the HRM. This principle of HRM is all about how people act and behave in a formal setting. Modern human resource management is guided by a few main principles.
With the support of relevant examples, examine the development of management theories and how these theories may affect the management practices in PRIMARK:
Define and discuss the different theories of management, using practical examples from your experience or knowledge. Compare classical management theory to any contemporary.
The same as Mary Follett, Elton Mayo with theories of human relations suggested that employees should attain their distinctiveness, steadiness and enjoyment which would give them willingness to collaborate and devote energy to achieve the common goal (Kaufman, 2001). From Mayo’s viewpoint, his researches indicated that the integration other than the opposition was crucial, and each separate member should involve in teamwork rather than work by their own (Wren, 1985: 309-320). For Mary Follett, this declaration was the concern of human nature. Mayo has been recognized as a humanism theorist (Smith, 1998) whereas Follett has been commemorated as one of dominant theorists on humanity, a leader among revolutionary scholars.
Taylor imagined that workers would be able to make out the relationship between completion of more work in units and the economic rewards been increased. Taylors work as described by (Buchanan and Huczynski, 2004) depicts how theories were to take place at shop floor levels, then how facts were substituted for opinion and guess work. Henri Fayol, his fellow classical writer had a different perception which looked at organisation from top to bottom. The pace setters of classical theories had engineering background hence derived theories with scientific approach. (Buchanan and Huczunski, 2004). (Cole, 2004) talks about how the production environment under the classical theory in America had created difficulties, where labour force were skint, uneducated, and in quest of making economic fortunes. (Lemak, 2004) point out how the classical management has had
The history of management includes multiple theories and understanding them can help individuals identify the ideas their organization is built upon. Classical organizational theory encompasses several major approaches to management that continue to be influential even today. The early to mid-twentieth century included the introduction of many concepts of management theory such as scientific management, bureaucratic and administrative theory. Most of these early approaches revolved around control of employees and processes in order to achieve more
The definition of ‘management’ is controversial and subject to much debate. There have been many contradictory views on what the term ‘management’ means and accordingly how one should correctly manage an organisation. These theories have been put forward by several highly regarded management scholars over time. By taking into account past knowledge and contemporary views on management, we are able to ‘’explore how thinking has changed through time’’. (Brooks, 2006). Moreover, businesses have, and can continue to be able to adapt these theories and put them into practice. Successfully applying correct management practices is especially vital in a global business environment which is becoming very competitive. ‘’Most management theories, even those that do not resonate comfortably with the prevailing mood, have attractive and valid elements to them.’’ (Robinson, 2005). For example, some of these theories can be seen flourishing in fast food chains like McDonalds.
Human Relations School theory is indeed an efficient management approach with a profusion of benefits. Being a large business, the human relations system is beneficial as directors are appointed and decision making is made based on discussions. This was the case when after negociations, the sales manager was in charge of price cutting to keep customers, the advertising manager taking charge of new adverts and Roberto concentrating on the prospect of entering the gluten-free market.
Before the Salmonella outbreak, Alfredo as a CEO of Bella Foods used human relation approach to manage Bella Food. Human relation theory made by Elton Mayo underlined the importance of groups in affecting the individual behavior when working (Law. J, 2009).