Re: Global Equity Markets: The Case of Royal Dutch and Shell
Structure: The Royal Dutch/Shell Group is different because it appears that it is functioning as a single company instead of two separate companies. Yet, they are functioning as two separate companies. The Shell Company in the Netherlands, the Shell Company in the UK and the Shell Petroleum Company in the USA all appear to be maintaining their own identities in their respective countries. The Royal Dutch and Shell Company share equally in the Shell Company in the Netherlands, The Shell Company in the UK and the Shell Company in the U.S. They are not separate companies since they are linked by corporate charter. There is a separation of the two entities on the holding
…show more content…
The third option would be to enter into a swap with the Wall Street firm.
Net Payoffs: The case stated that the one way commission is 5cents per share. New York has a two way commission of 10 cents giving us a 25 cent commission. Shell (London) has 30 basis points for commission for small trades since we are going for a round trip the total basis points would be 60 plus the 50 basis points for the Stamp Tax. Shell was quoted a spread of .03 divided by 8.63 x 10,000equals 35 plus 03 plus 03 (going both ways gives us a total of 151 bps Royal Dutch (Amsterdam has a spread of 227.8 which is divided into .3 x 10000 giving us a 13 bps plus commission of 30 cents per share going both ways for a total of 60 cents per share and a FX spread of 06 (03 +03 ((down and back)) giving us a total of 79 per share.
Buy/Sell Option
The first arbitrage option will be 395,088 x 25 cents transaction cost =$98,772
You would then add the transaction cost in London $5000 x 151= $755,000
The total transaction cost for this would be $853,000.
Buy/Short Option
The second arbitrage opportunity would involve a transaction cost of:
$5600 of Royal Dutch x 73 in Amsterdam =$408,800
Plus $5000x151
This happens through a down-stairs merger. The remaining shell would be merged with Veritas and in exchange Seagate existing shareholders are distributed new Veritas shares proportionally. This unlocks the value of the shares without facing double taxation through the corporate tax of 34%. The existing shareholders only incur a personal capital gains tax on their investment holdings. The purpose of this part of the transaction is to successfully deliver the maximum amount of value from the appreciation of the Veritas stake to Seagate’s existing shareholders.
offering them different options - the choice of $20 in cash, additional new common shares
Is the present structure consistent with current corporate objectives, strategies, policies, and programs, as well as with the firm's international operations?
Organizational Hierarchy Structure- Toys R Us was a decentralized organization, which had a leadership type setting from country to country. This type of structure was difficult because all the leaders from different countries were not communicating effectively. The company knew they had to make some changes to the system, if they wanted to be successful. Therefore, after careful consideration, the company decided to move to a more centralized structure. This change was needed to strengthen their business with regards to their compatibility amongst countries and creating a more efficient workplace in the United States and abroad. In the company’s business in Europe, instead of their being different leaders across the continent, there will
EZ Funding Group, Inc. is a mortgage brokerage firm that is located in Miramar, Florida. EZ Funding Group, Inc. was established in 2000. Their mortgage loans options include home purchase loans, home refinance loans, HARP 2.0 loans, home equity loans, cash out home loans, jumbo home loans, and more. EZ Funding Group, Inc. also offers FHA home loans VA home loans, reverse mortgage loans, Fannie Mae Home Path loans, plus more. This mortgage lending agency is an Equal Housing Lender.
* The recent devaluation of Pound Sterling (£1) against the US Dollar ($1.5) means, Pret spend more money trading globally, compared to when the Pound Sterling (£1) much stronger than the US Dollar ($2). This will affect their annual profits or is likely to lead to unethical trading as they look for the cheapest sources to get their raw materials.
( All Business 2012 ). Another scenario may be to use a mediator instead of an arbitrator who would allow the parties to work out a mutually acceptable solution. With a pending class action suit, the brokerage may offer a reasonable settlement to avoid any further expense. This and other forms of alternate dispute resolution are the least expensive and the least time-consuming procedures, as compared to formal alternatives. Other considerations for using a less formal process are the psychological consequences of negotiations. ( Fugate & Kinicki 2012 ). Mr Groetsch, or other family members, may have other financial investments with Securities America and, as such, they may want to maintain a friendly relationship with the firm. As an added-value negotiation, the Groetsch family may be able to acquire stock in other companies in exchange for the worthless Medical Capital bonds, which could eventually become worth more than a cash settlement. Finally, if the plaintiff has no need to maintain a friendly relationship with the brokerage firm, it may be possible to mediate or arbitrate a settlement to recover the monetary losses and still pursue punitive damages in court as a separate civil action.
For your job as the business reporter for a local newspaper, you are asked to put together a series of articles on multinational finance and the international currency markets for your readers. Much recent local press coverage has been given to losses in the foreign exchange markets by JGAR, a local firm that is the subsidiary of Daedlufetarg, a large German manufacturing firm.
These equity listings are different from companies such as BP and Exxon. All subsidiary companies’ shares were held by the Group Holding Companies in the ratio of 60/40 (Royal Dutch/Shell). The corporate structure is outlined in the figure below.
For a private investor there would be no difference in the tax treatment between the two investment opportunities. However, pension funds have different tax treatments in each jurisdiction depending on whether the investor bought Royal Dutch or Shell. In Exhibit 8 of the case study, Royal Dutch was trading for $141.368 in Europe and $141.375 in New York (a 7 cent differential). Shell was trading for $124.222 in Europe and $126.554 in New York (a $2.332 differential). These price differences exist due to market inefficiencies; however, these differences are small. As shown in the last column of Exhibit 11, these calculations render small estimates of the impact of these discrepancies. The percentage would be approximately 1% of the company valuation. The impact of these differences is calculated with the following formula: Avg. dividend for the group x Difference in tax treatment for the two entities.
Financial institutions are acting as fiduciaries to their investors and clients. In the execution process, buy side traders need to demonstrate reasonable steps to determine a best execution condition, follow their defined firm level best execution trading policy and perform fair dealing to all client accounts on trades. Broker dealers are obligated to provide best execution opportunities to buy side clients as well. In the US market, both SEC and FINRA have articulated the responsibility of broker-dealers to provide best executions that are reasonably available. According to CFA institute’s trade management guidelines, best execution is defined as “the trading process firms apply that seeks to maximize the value of a client’s portfolio within the client’s stated investment objectives and constraints”.
3. Is the present structure consistent with current corporate objectives, strategies, policies, and programs, as well as with the firm’s international operations? Yes, all areas are
1. An international bank loaned money to an emerging country a few years ago. Because of the nonpayment of interest due on this loan, the bank is now negotiating with the borrower to exchange the loan for Brady bonds. The Brady bonds that would be issued would be either par bonds or discount bonds with the same time to maturity.
There are 4 group companies in the current structure. Following is a brief on all the companies as to what they do and what businesses they are into.