Spiteri L. F. (2007). The Structure and Form of Folksonomy Tags: The Road to the Public Library Catalog. Information Technology & Libraries, 26(3), 13-25.
Louise Spiteri discusses the structure of folksonomy tags that were collected from various websites for a thirty-day period. The tags were than analyzed by the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) guidelines for the controlled vocabularies. She states that of the NISO guidelines used to analyze the types of folksonomies expressed, it was mainly focused on terms and nouns, use of recognized spelling, and others. She continues in her paper about the benefits and weaknesses of folksonomies as well as the applications that a folksonomy can use. Interestingly, it isn’t just social
…show more content…
He states that there isn’t a single library that has everything in their collection and it is possible for libraries to share between one another. In digital libraries, the collaboration between libraries is different. They assign key words using controlled vocabulary, classification schemes, and other to describe the content. However, this does yield as a problem. Sometimes keywords don’t match between libraries, or a word that a user would consider for the content not match the keyword the librarian had given it. Zaveri suggests the idea of collaborative tagging as a solution to the loss of connection between users and digital libraries. Zaveri then discusses reasons for digital library collaboration from lack of funds, specialization, to data preservation, and role of the country in the world, as digital libraries don’t have a boundary like physical libraries. Because of this importance, Zaveri states it’s necessary to have the users also assign keywords and tags through collaborative tagging. Zaveri continues with discussing the benefits of collaborative tagging, the main one being that what the user tags, the organization of information is shared with other users and they are able to look for that object with that tag. There are then several example of social media sites that use collaborative tagging discussed: Flickr, Delicious, and LibraryThing. Zaveri then compares LibraryThing’s tagging to the LSCH subject headings, which shows that certain terms are used differently between the pair mainly the vocabulary used to identify. Zaveri ends his article with the advantages and disadvantages of collaborative tagging, stating that libraries should include folksonomies to be made more interactive with the users that are in the digital
In the article “The Hive” written by Marshall Poe, the author defines the role of “information sharing” as one of contribution to the progress of human knowledge through the process of communication and technology. Poe’s view’s on the role of information sharing are portrayed through the history and events leading to the creation of Wikipedia. Along the way, Poe also discusses the two dominant models for universal directories present in the 1990’s, top-down and bottom-up in his article. In doing so, Marshal Poe introduces the power of the community to share information, when given the chance. This paper will analyze Poe’s thoughts on the internet and information sharing through the examination of top-down and bottom-up systems, as well as
The author starts off with a rhetorical question: “What kind of problem is a library?” urging the readers to think about this question as they continue to read the article. The question grabs the readers’ attention, and intrigues them to read on to find and answer. She further utilizes this technique of rhetorical questions throughout the article for the same purpose of emphasis on the vitality of the role of public libraries. Moreover, Smith extensively employs the use of metaphors and personification. For example, she describes the internet as libraries’ “universal death knell”, which portrays the internet’s negative impact on the development of
A "citation needed" tag is a request for another editor to verify a statement: a form of communication between members of a collaborative editing community. It is never, in itself, an "improvement" of an article. Though readers may be alerted by a "citation needed" that a particular statement is not supported, many readers don't fully understand the community's processes. Not all tags get addressed in a timely manner, staying in place for months or years, forming an ever growing Wikipedia backlog—this itself can be a problem. Best practice recommends the following:
Metadata will include access management, preservation, administrative, descriptive, technical and structural data. Much of the metadata will have to be created. The original volumes had no table of contents, index, or other description of the records. Additionally, volumes were arranged chronologically with no attention paid to document type, source, or content. In addition to author, title, publisher, and date, descriptive metadata will be expanded include keywords regarding subjects, individuals, locations, or events referenced in the document, as well as any related documents. This will be a time consuming and costly effort, but it required to maximize the value of the online data to researchers, students, teachers, etc. An index for all volumes was completed after the fact in 1909 and that index will be incorporated into a referential database behind the web page front end, rather than in the metadata itself. A complete list of metadata elements are provided in Appendix
“Clubbing our books to a common library, we should, while we lik’d to keep them together, have each of us the advantage of using the books of all the other members, which would be nearly beneficial as if each owned the whole.” (Benjamin Franklin)
As new technologies are rapidly introduced, people are able to find any information with the access of internet. This leads to people questioning the relevance of libraries and its true purpose. Public libraries cultivate the value of increased education and a social unity to advancing as a society.
The assignments for this course were certainly eye-opening for someone who intends to do cataloging and classifying work in the future. I naively assumed going in that there would be some ultimate form of classifying, but it seems the true winning combo is a combination of multiple, whether that be LCC, LCSH, DCC, folksonomy, or other ontologies. This work is integral to
“Technology” by H. Stephen Wright is a scholarly article detailing the inefficiencies of technology dealing with cataloging in libraries. In this article, Wright’s main argument surrounds the difficulty of predicting future technological breakthroughs, specifically in libraries and the music industry. He continually criticizes and undermines the power that modern technology possesses. He goes on to find fault in the durability of technology because libraries have to constantly update its collection. Granted that this article was written more than a decade ago, Wright’s criticism still presents a limited understanding of the possibilities of technological advancements.
As society has progressed into the twenty-first century it is evident that humanity is becoming strongly reliant on technology, especially the internet in which people now use instantaneously on a daily basis, from diagnosing diseases to finding answers, information and gossip within moments of it occurring. Wikipedia is “a free, collaborative, multilingual internet encyclopedia. Wikipedia evolves without the supervision of a pre-selected expert
Pariser clearly explains how numerous source outlets, including books, newspapers, and possibly television, are quickly becoming outdated and obsolete as a result of the growing personalized web and the expansion of other companies by utilizing the internet, and he supports this claim with several examples of this phenomenon that already occurred or are currently occurring. The best example of the latter is when Amazon launched and used its “personalization code” (29), which allowed customers to not only buy books from their computers, but also find similar books easily because the website remembers their selections and updates its list of recommendations accordingly. In addition, the introduction of the Kindle gave people the ability to
Since their establishment, libraries have served as a gateway to knowledge and services that revolutionized the way the public attains information. Unlike many other institutions, public libraries have grown and evolved along with society by adopting new technology and offering resources tailored to the needs of their local community.
Social media is a technological tool that allows users to share information (Business Dictionary, n.d.). Other common features include the ability for visitors to create personalized profiles or accounts where they can post information for others to view and the ability to link their accounts to others (Nations, n.d.). Within the term the “social” component means sharing with others and the “media” component refers to the technology that allows for the sharing (Nations, n.d.)
For students to be adequately informed about the value of the university library and resources such as the Internet in information retrieval there must be a careful collaboration between teaching staff and library staff (Kenney, 2007). The focus in this task, of course, is preparing students not just for the immediate research project at hand but rather to prepare them to be life long learners, to prepare them to be successful and productive once they leave the academic environment and take up their chosen careers (Lauer & Yodanis, 2012).
The term ‘social media’ has become a broad-term to describe a large number of online systems that serve as a platform for the generation, and distribution of user-generated content. Social media creates a virtual social space, where a large number of users come together and interact with one another. These interactions can be either structured, such as responses that are moderated on blogs, semi-structured, such as a discussion between an extended network on Facebook, or unstructured, such as the anarchial functioning of Twitter.
Digital users who are in contact with the libraries services only via "cyberspace" (Gruca, 2010, para. 2) and users who require face-to-face services