preview

Folksonomy Tags: The Road To The Public Library Catalog

Good Essays

Spiteri L. F. (2007). The Structure and Form of Folksonomy Tags: The Road to the Public Library Catalog. Information Technology & Libraries, 26(3), 13-25.

Louise Spiteri discusses the structure of folksonomy tags that were collected from various websites for a thirty-day period. The tags were than analyzed by the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) guidelines for the controlled vocabularies. She states that of the NISO guidelines used to analyze the types of folksonomies expressed, it was mainly focused on terms and nouns, use of recognized spelling, and others. She continues in her paper about the benefits and weaknesses of folksonomies as well as the applications that a folksonomy can use. Interestingly, it isn’t just social …show more content…

He states that there isn’t a single library that has everything in their collection and it is possible for libraries to share between one another. In digital libraries, the collaboration between libraries is different. They assign key words using controlled vocabulary, classification schemes, and other to describe the content. However, this does yield as a problem. Sometimes keywords don’t match between libraries, or a word that a user would consider for the content not match the keyword the librarian had given it. Zaveri suggests the idea of collaborative tagging as a solution to the loss of connection between users and digital libraries. Zaveri then discusses reasons for digital library collaboration from lack of funds, specialization, to data preservation, and role of the country in the world, as digital libraries don’t have a boundary like physical libraries. Because of this importance, Zaveri states it’s necessary to have the users also assign keywords and tags through collaborative tagging. Zaveri continues with discussing the benefits of collaborative tagging, the main one being that what the user tags, the organization of information is shared with other users and they are able to look for that object with that tag. There are then several example of social media sites that use collaborative tagging discussed: Flickr, Delicious, and LibraryThing. Zaveri then compares LibraryThing’s tagging to the LSCH subject headings, which shows that certain terms are used differently between the pair mainly the vocabulary used to identify. Zaveri ends his article with the advantages and disadvantages of collaborative tagging, stating that libraries should include folksonomies to be made more interactive with the users that are in the digital

Get Access