preview

Freedom: Digital and Literal Essay

Better Essays

The internet has become an integral part of our lives, linking people overseas, transmitting ideas, and propelling innovation. In order to continue the innovations and links, governments and service providers should not regulate, restrict, or censor the internet.
The internet, as it stands today, serves as a medium for our entertainment, communication, and commercial needs. It is something many of us have come to take for granted. The original intended purpose of the first “internet,” however, goes back to the days of the Cold War where the ever looming threat of a nuclear missile attack prompted the U.S., as well as many other countries, to build a robust, fault-tolerant, and widely distributed computer network. By 1970, ARPANET had …show more content…

Fortunately, news quickly spread and petitions were submitted, preventing its passing. Senator Wyden expressed his opposition, claiming that “the collateral damage of this statute could be American innovation, American jobs, and a secure internet." Copyrighted works make up only a small fraction of the World Wide Web. To impose such far-reaching legislation will harm irrelevant law-abiding businesses.
This year, the House tried passing the Stop Online Piracy Act, or “SOPA.” At first glance, it appears to be a reasonable bill aimed to protect the works of artists and copyright holders. The bill, however, could easily create an atmosphere in which any individual may file a complaint and have any site removed, cutting off the site’s revenue, if “pirated” content is found on the site, regardless of whether or not the site’s owners were the ones that uploaded the file. In effect, “SOPA kills the safe harbor in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act,” (Dignan) which protects sites as long as they act in good faith and do all in their power to actively remove illegal content under copyright.
Under SOPA, the process required to respond to litigation or a complaint would likely absorb an average small host’s entire yearly profit. Given the small business nature of the hosting industry, hosting businesses are not in a position to absorb the litigation costs associated with SOPA. The notice-and-termination procedure runs afoul of the 'prior restraint'

Get Access