Government does not have My College's Back

Caplan says that, “increasing education across a country’s population by an average of one year per person raises the national income by only 1 to 3 percent,” (14). By conceding his main argument in the side of individuals Caplan can change focus to a larger group, observing the usefulness, or lack thereof, of college for nations. While Caplan successfully harnesses the power of pathos and ethos to support his argument that college is a waste of time and money, he falls short in his use of

The idea of a universal education system is criticized by many, because the idea of giving everyone a chance to prosper, has a detrimental effect on government resources; and the value placed on a post- secondary education, is somewhat diluted. This is wrong though, as people be judged on their academic skills, character and drive above their economic restrictions. The finances which a young person is born into, should not determine the life and career which they have. It has been shown that a college education increases a person’s earning power, but this education is contingent on money, which dictates your chance of achieving a recognized education. This is against the ‘education gospel’ which supports the idea that schooling should be for everyone, and that the more people who are educated, the less prejudices there will be in society. Education is universal, but post-secondary education, and one which leads people to positions of power and influence, is not. It is for the select few, of whom have the finances and opportunities to prosper that other, more underprivileged people do not, and that needs to change.

A very popular topic these days is College tuition. For what seems to be ages, people didn’t give much attention to the cost of tuition. However, in current times theres been a dramatic change. It seems that everyday, several people are coming to the harsh realization of how high tuition has gotten over the years and they wish to see a change. In this essay, I shall attempt to cover a very serious and hard topic. I say that because in the process of finding information for this topic, there are several articles showing examples of people attacking administrations in serious anger. Little to no information was found giving an example of college staff and administration trying to defend or speak up. Before beginning research for this paper, I believed there would have been several arguments made between enraged parents, students, graduates and administration. Though, upon examination I found my thoughts to be confirmed as false for the most part.

Higher education has a vast history; beginning in the early colonial period and spanning ten generations. With its wide range of history, aspects of higher education have changed as the ideals and reforms of society adjusted. Albeit, the missions and purposes of college have remained the same. In this paper, I will clarify the three main missions and purposes of higher education. Then, I will shift the focus of the paper to the area I would like to pursue in higher education and how it reflects those purposes.

College, a universal, fundamental concept that the globe utilizes. Through a wide array of variations, countries across the world have developed their own meaning of what higher education is. However, the underlying tone of it all is the same, furthering one’s knowledge. With a vast number of schools from a broad range of locations trying to pull the population in, colleges compete with different tactics ranging from education relevance to evaluation. Consequently, problems have arisen from these approaches, addressed along the lines in an article called “A New Course” by Magdalena Kay, an associate professor of English at the University of Victoria and an educational film, “Ivory Tower” by Andrew Rossi, a graduate of Harvard and Yale University and a filmmaker. Furthermore, these problems change the meaning of college itself, no longer seen as an education, but as a commodity.

Educational goals are seen to be an area of great concern in the era of globalization. Universities will continually play a immense role increasing a better society. (S. Chinnammai, 2005)

Ms. Jones’ students of 6th period, do you really want to live in a country where in order to seek higher education to eventually obtain a job, you must pay thousands of dollars to do so? I certainly do not. As prospective students—people who will attend college in the future— we all dream about free university and many might consider if college is even worth it.Coming from someone who is just like every single student in this class; I am sure you all will agree that public college should be virtually free.

George Leef discusses several important points in his article “You Will Pay for “Free” College” (n.pag.). Leef first explains that college will never be completely free (n.pag.). In order to have one thing we must give up another and there is no way around that (Leef n.pag.). Leef clarifies with his readers that all the government can do about college tuition is transition the cost from students to taxpayers (n.pag.). George continues his argument with his point that free college tuition will influence colleges in a negative way (n.pag.). A move from students to taxpayers will not only result

Filmmaker and documentarian Andrew Rossi has restated the hot-button issue nowadays through his movie, Ivory Tower. After watching his documentary, I have learnt about the realistic possibilities of becoming debtors of students after colleges. Consequently, a large range of students has stood up to demonstrate this idea. He offered the remarkable experience of Cooper Union as a case in point. The fact that the tuition fee of post-secondary institutions within 30 years rises rapidly up to 1120% startles everybody. This exploding statistic, however, is led by the intension between colleges to expand its facilities and programs. Also, the movie informs its audience

President Barack Obama is proposing a plan that would allow community colleges to become more accessible for lower income households, who may not have the means to pay for higher forms of education. This issue on whether to focus and divert most of governmental funds to community colleges has sparked a lot of controversy throughout the nation. The United States is known as one of the most influential countries, with the strongest military defenses the world has ever seen. But by pushing for lower tuition prices or even free college tuition it requires a decision that looks at all sides of the spectrum. Powerful men like Nelson Mandela have said, “Education is one of the most powerful weapons which you can use to change the world”; however, education does come with a high price that most Americans are not willing to pay for. Although providing a higher form of education to low income households will increase the number of educated people within our communities; however, it will not compensate for the negative effects on our society.

In the United States, known as the land of opportunity, becoming a success, gaining wealth, and having an elevated standard of life can come through many pathways. There is not a single road towards personal success. Despite numerous paths, the most traveled is one of a college degree. This is no coincidence, because employers everywhere look to recruit people who have these degrees. However, what if someone who has the right intentions, great potential, and inexhaustible motivation cannot attend because of monetary reasons? This is why the United States should fabricate a tuition-free nation.

Andrew Kelly’s article “The Problem Is That Free College Isn’t Free” originally appeared in the New York Times, and due to the large audience that normally views this website and newspaper each day, there’s no doubt that he had an influence on those who read his article, particularly those in his intended audience of taxpayers and students. The author uses

However, in regards to this “crisis” Chase reflects on the many contributions that the nations universities bring to the table. Colleges employ hundreds of thousands of people while some also keep the cities in which they’re located financially afloat. Schools exist to serve a variety of student’s educational needs and rites of passages. Amongst these contributions many schools are faced with financial pressure, decreasing public opinion, and weakening faculty and student loyalty. The most effective to this adversary is to crack down on academic dishonesty.

The prohibitive cost of a four years College is a terrible investment. According to National Center for Education Statistics, The average published tuition and fee price for in-state students enrolled full time at public four-year colleges is approximately $16,000 per year. Plus assume another $10,000 in living costs, books, etc. $26,000 in total for a complete cost of $104,000 in a 4 year period. Private college is even more expensive. $104,000 definitely is not a small numbers of money, not every family has such financial ability to afford their child to go to College. Under the uncertain economy outlook of American, College is going to become a private land for the wealthy. Incidentally, we are making a huge assumption that you can graduate

Once again , Komolafe stresses the fact that “It is imperative that we place priority on educating our people once again; otherwise we will not be able to compete in our own country, much less globally” The truth of the matter is that Bahamians need to take initiative and educate themselves on the importance of how growing up without an education is detrimental to future generations of the Bahamian society, persons who drop out of school or only stick to a basic high school education will face hardship in their lives as they grow older because it is noted that Lack of education on their part means lack of money to support a family and this Lack of steady income translates into stealing or breaking into other persons homes or convenience stores to obtain what is need to saturate their own