Compare and contrast research by Harry Harlow and Mary Ainsworth on understanding attachment
This essay is looking at the similarities of two researchers into attachment. The aim is to present their work so as to compare and contrast the different approaches and techniques used by both Harry Harlow and Mary Ainsworth. Even though they both had their different techniques in carrying out their experiments, the conclusion of their findings was very similar and this essay will be showing these findings by contrast. Both psychologists wanted to find out the underlying mechanics of attachment of mothers and their young.
Firstly an American psychologist namely Harry Harlow who almost by accident started the most influential work in
…show more content…
So upon which she used the technique of observation to seemingly reach the same result as Harlow in that attachment is based on “contact comfort”.
Also realising in her study the importance of a “safe base” to infants, as in the observation research carried out on the Uganda families “if the mothers were unresponsive and emotionally detached, their infants seem to cry a lot more and often seemed clingy or insecure”(Discovering psychology, p.216,2010).
We see the advantages of Ainsworh 's study in wanting to find out about attachment in humans, by studying humans. As well as showing more credibility into the mechanics of human attachment it also provided Ainsworth with the opportunity to develop a highly influential procedure called the strange situation because of the complexity of humans. This procedure consisted of a series of seven episodes involving three participants, namely mother, baby and a stranger.
Page 3 personal identifier: C3257246
On completion of the procedure in the highly controlled environment (which
Attachment is a deep and enduring emotional bond that connects one person to another across time and space (Bowlby, 1969). Likewise, attachment theory is a psychological model that seeks to illustrate the dynamics of both long term and short- term interpersonal relationships (Waters, E.; Corcoran, D.; Anafarta, M. 2005). Additionally, attachment theory address how people respond within relationships when hurt, separated from loved ones, or when they perceive a threat (Waters et al., 2005). Attachment theory is the combined work of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth (Bretherton, I. 1992, p. 1). The theory predominantly draws on the ideas from doctrines such as, ethology, cybernetics, information processing and developmental psychology (Bretherton, I. 1992, p. 1). It is considered that attachment theory has revolutionized the way society thinks about the relationship between the mother and her child and the importance of
This essay will compare and contrast the work of psychologists Harry Harlow and Mary Ainsworth. To compare and contrast will be to emphasise the similarities and differences of both Harlow and Ainsworth’s work on understanding attachment, to which they have both made great contribution. Attachment refers to the mutually affectionate developing bond between a mother and any other caregiver (Custance 2010). It is a bond in which the infant sees the caregiver as a protective and security figure. Failing to form any type of attachment during the earliest years of childhood is thought to lead to social and emotional developmental issues that can carry on well into adult life (Custance 2010). Attachment theory was formulated by psychoanalyst
This qualitative research was conducted to ascertain if the attachment style a person has as an adult is created or influenced by his/her interactions with early childhood experiences. The research was carried out by means of a thematic analysis of an interview of a married middle-aged couple. The interviews bought the themes of Work, Childhood and Relationships to the foreground and these were analysed to establish if there is a connection in our childhood attachments and those we make as adults. It can be seen that there are similarities to the attachment types of infants compared to those that
Ainsworth’s Strange Situation experiment involved a mother a child and a stranger. The experiment show that when the child was attached to the mother she was the only one who could comfort the child. The stranger could not comfort the child and when the child was left alone with out the mother the child would be upset. Ainsworth’s experiment showed that there are three types of attachment styles secure attachment, ambivalent attachment, and avoidant attachment. The child with secure attachment was very upset when the mother left and was not comforted by the stranger. Once the mother came back the child was okay and began to play again. Children with this type of attachment do this with their attachment figure because they know that the
Mary Ainsworth was a developmental psychologist who is most commonly known for her attachment theory. Ainsworth ran an experiment that tested toddlers ages 1 to 2, in order to test infants and their responses to strange situations. This experiment reveals which 1 of 4 attachment styles children may possess. One type of attachment is secure attachment, this occurs when a child is very attached to the mother. Typically the child will explore and engage with others when the mother is in the room, but, when the mother leaves, this child will show negative emotions. When left alone with the stranger, the child will avoid the him. Anxious-Resistant Insecure Attachment is when a child becomes irritated when the stranger appears in the room, while mother is still in the room. Even when mother leaves, the child will not explore and continue play. However, when mother comes back the child acts resentful and upset towards their mother. Anxious-Avoidant Insecure Attachment is where a child seems careless. They show little emotions whether their mother is in the room or not. They don't want to be played with or held, they act the same towards stranger as well. Lastly, Disorganized/Disoriented Attachment is when a child might be distressed when the mother leaves the room and be relieved when she comes back. However,
The main reasons given for the type of attachment of the child were: parenting behavior and style, infant temperament, stress, genetic differences, and long hours in non-parental care. Some of Ainsworth’s peers questioned her thinking, on how a parents’ interactions with a child defines their attachment, but what if those interactions change, will the child’s attachment change as well? Most came to the conclusion that the attachment can change as often as the parent’s circumstances are changing (Mooney 33). Some people also thought, that Ainsworth’s research was biased because she did not observe relationships between the children and fathers. Ainsworth believed that the attachment was so very important and that a lot of the best attachment came through feeding time. Ainsworth's research showed that feeding a child on demand rather than on a schedule led to a more secure attachment between the child and
Although Rosalie did not make any contributions on her own to psychology, her name is paired with John Watson’s on one of the most influential studies of the 1920’s. “Little Albert” is such a landmark study because Watson and Rayner were able to show that emotional responses could be conditioned, or learned. The implications of this research over the years have been outstanding. The “Little Albert” study is extremely important in psychology and other disciplines. It has inspired other important researchers of the past and continues to impact the direction of psychological investigation today. The “Little Albert” implications had a profound effect on the world at the time. In fact, Watson’s findings continue to influence psychology, especially therapy, even in modern times.
Mary Ainsworth conducted a number of observational studies over the course of two years whist living in Uganda with her husband. (reference) When Mary Ainsworth realised that observational study alone may not be enough to convince the academic community of the validity of her work in Uganda, Ainsworth developed the Strange Situation Procedure (Audio reference). The Strange Situation Procedure involves seven episodes of a parent leaving an unfamiliar room, a stranger entering with the mother of the child leaving the room, the stranger attempting to interact with the child, and ultimately the mother retuning to the child. (reference) The reaction of the child upon the return of the primary caregiver is the dependent variable that Ainsworth focused her studies on. The response of the child is then categorised into four “attachment categories” , “stable” “anxious-resistant”,
Harry Israel was born in Fairfield, a small town in Iowa. He was the third of four boys and grew up in a family that placed a top quality on the value of education. When he completed his bachelor and doctoral degrees at Stanford University, his advisor convinced Harry to change his surname from Israel to Harlow because of the concern of possible discrimination of his last name. In 1930, Harlow began work as a comparative psychologist at the University of Wisconsin in Madison and remained there for his entire career. Among many honors, Harlow was a member of the National Academy of Sciences, was elected president of the American Psychological Association, and received the National Medal of Science from President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1967.
At the core of attachment theory is the early relations between infant and the primary caregiver, usually the mother (Levy, Johnson, Clouthier, Scala, & Temes, 2015). Attachment theory is based on the pioneering work of John Bowlby (1969, 1980, 1988) after a long and somewhat conflicted association with psychoanalysis (Holmes, 1993 p.62). Bowlby’s theory of attachment was partly based on the findings of ethology and argued that attachment between infant and mother was not merely an instinct derived from feeding or infant sexuality as Freud and Klein first claimed, but was a psychological bond in its own right (Fitton, 2012).
Attachment is the strong affectionate tie we have for special people in our lives that leads us to experience pleasure and joy when we interact with them and to be comforted by their nearness in times of stress (Berk). Within the first couple of months after birth, the infant forms an attachment to the familiar people who respond to and frequent their needs. Also in these first few months, the infant must often be touched, coddled, and shown affection. Without these gestures they may later show signs of developmental and emotional problems. Freud suggests that the infant’s emotional tie to the mother is the foundation for all later relationships (Berk).
Unlike Freud’s psychoanalytic perspective which regarded feeding as the focal point for parent and child to build the close emotional bond, Bowlby did not believe that providing nourishment was enough to build a bond enough to ensure a strong attachment. He believed the ingredients to building a secure bond included touching, talking to, nurturing and providing nourishment for the infant were the basis for building this bond. He did believe feeding played a role in secure attachments. This paper will look at the main features of the “Strange Situation” an experiment which sought to understand attachment and related exploratory behavior.
Ainsworth & Bell (1970) explains the relationship between a mother and a child, in regards to attachment and exploration. The article discusses the child’s attachment behavior during separation and reunion of the mother. Ainsworth & Bell (1970) research exemplifies the idea of nurture being the primary reason for some characteristics of attachment to lead into adulthood. Ainsworth & Bell (1970) believe that attachment to the mother increases explanatory behavior and separation causes insecurities towards the mother. This theory, nonetheless, has several impediments. While attachment behavior to the mother is crucial for the relationship among the infant and the mother, this is not the only relationship that is established among infants. Relationships with close family members and fathers need to be considered. White middle class families were used during the experiment, while the middle class is known to have a healthier lifestyle then lowercase families. Ainsworth & Bell (l970) lack to show variation among infants that grew up in a bad environment that could potentially play a factor among infant and mother attachmment. Ainsworth & Bell (1970) research is in nurture during early child development context; however the environment and connections made with people throughout a child’s life also shape attachment characteristics among children.
Attachment theory, a developmental psychology concept, relays the significance of early attachment in development as studied throughout the works of John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. The
A psychologist by the name of Mary Ainsworth conducted a study named “Strange Situation” where she talks about three types of styles of attachment. These styles include secure attachment, ambivalent-insecure attachment, and avoidant-insecure attachment. Mary Ainsworth is mainly known for her extended research on the work of John Bowlby and Attachment Theory. Ainsworth created a procedure called “Strange Situation” in order to observe and asses the condition of attachment in relationships with caregivers and children. In this study, the child involved is observed for twenty minutes as they play in a room