How The Large Families Can Be Better Than Small Families

Naomi Gerstel and Natalia Sarkisian, the authors, did a research on Americans’ life and wrote the article to describe the relationship of family between the different races. In the introduction of the article, Naomi and Natalia mentioned that political people focused on the ties between married couples and their children. In the society, people often hear that poor families were chaotic and their family tie was weaker because rates of non-marriage and single parenthood were very high. There were there two bar graphs at the top of pages to show Gerstel and Sarkisian’s examination on

The essay starts with a very simple definition of a family, accompanied by an explanation of the relationship between family structure and the strength of the link between different people forming the family in question. The introduction has been put in a simple language to provide a fluid understanding of what the reader should expect throughout the text. Literal tools like proverbs and similes have been applied. There is a clear language connection of cultural legacy and a family unit where the authors explain that legacy in the society does not determine how different ethnicities connect with the family unit. Gertsel and Sarkasian believe that deliberations made on family responsibilities tend to pay more attention to nuclear family as opposed to the general family unit. The language used here implies that the general meaning of extended family unit is ignored or in some cases misrepresented.

This investigation will focus on; “What impact does family size have on conformity?” This is an experimental design using quantitative subjective data which is achieved through the form of statistics from questionnaires. The independent variable of family sizes will be tested against individual percentages of conformity. According to the Oxford Dictionaries, The definition of conformity is the behaviour with accordance to socially accepted convention or standards. (Oxford Dictionaries, 2016)

In our society, we carry an ideological assumption that a “normal” family consists of the man working to provide for the family and the women takes on the role of stay-at-home mom (Dow 1992).

S., 2012). Family size can be important because the more kids in the family, the more toys and games that will most likely be purchased. There is more chance of growth in markets when family size is bigger. When it is less than the parents will buy fewer toys. In addition, each child goes through a cycle, and they would soon get to the stage where they do not play with toys.

They believe that having a large family “offers possible economic benefits”, particularly if a

The way in which the ‘family’ unit is perceived has changed immensely since the last quarter of the twentieth century. Over time, many factors have contributed to these changes including, and not limited to, the industrial revolution, the feminist movement, the period of modernity and technological advancements. As a result, these factors have influenced significant changes to the ‘family’, these include; the increasing rates of female occupation, mean age at marriage, divorce, unmarried couples, single parents, mean age at birth of first child, and a decline in marriage rates. Moreover, this essay will examine how the family has changed over time through discussing the factors that have contributed to these changes. It is for these reasons and observations made by sociologists that it could be inferred that the way the family unit is perceived has changed greatly over time.

The focus of government and states changed to the acquisition of wealth and economic stability with the reasoning that a stable country is one that meets its moral and statutory obligation of the provision of quality services to the citizenry (Keynes, 2016). The states and nations embarked in the provision and delivery of quality service to the population. The period witnessed the emergence of organized social security services to the citizenry. Health insurance, social and economic support to the citizens considered as poor. Keynes, (2016) asserts that working population who also happened to belong to the child bearing ages shifted concentration to economic stability and improved livelihood practices through manageable family sizes with more focus directed towards education and skills building. An average family size was no more than 4 in size on the maximum with majority of couples siring only a single child.

This paper will discuss the differences between families from the 1960’s and the families of today. There are many differences between the different times. I have focused on the parentage portion of the families. I explained what the ideal family is and how it is different today. I’ve also included ways that will help these families of today become stronger as a family.

The small family size indicating one of the deficiencies of development . It is desturbing the harmony of sociecty in which one generation is repleced by the next. As the smaller famiies are producing less childern so, the old are more and young ones are less and it keep decreasing the young population. Moreover due to small family size childern are not learning many qualities such as responsibility of younger sibling and the difference between need and desire. Additionaly, small family size facing more stress and lonliness because of more work load and less people to share.

Falbo had found that only children tend to have higher self-esteem and perform better in school, as well as a higher number of them get a post-secondary level education than people with siblings (Fablo and Goudreau, 2013). Anne-Marie Ambert, from the department of sociology at York University, had mentioned in her book, Changing Families: Relationships in Context, that children from larger families do not do as well in school, on average as children from smaller families. Also, children from smaller families advance professionally and socially, than from larger families (Ambert, 362). Leonardo Da Vinci, Thomas Edison, Elvis Presley, Condoleezza Rice, and Tiger Woods are some good examples of adults who were brought up in small family sizes and were only children. Each of these adults eventually made their way to fame and were highly successful in their academics and careers. Family size in the United States as well as Canada, have been shrinking since the 1960’s and only child families have increased significantly over the past few decades (Goudreau, 2013). So why are Canadians having so few children? Firstly, there are many reasons for such to happen, but a major reason is that some people expect higher-quality children; investing more time in them than usual. Zosia Bielski, a reporter who attended Oxford University mentioned in her article, What is so wrong with having only one child?,

First, being raised in a large family makes a child learn the rules of living in community. In fact, having numerous siblings forces children to develop organizational skills, because cohabiting with a large number of people demands management basics. Coordinating the meals, activities and transport trains kids to be organized and cooperative, qualities that will be useful further on in their lives when they will be part of a group. In addition, children raised in large families are generally more disciplined than the ones raised in normal-sized families. In the same way as a team, every member of a big family needs to collaborate and maintain his role for the group to be functional.

There are varieties of families in the world. People develop different personalities and mind sets because they have their own experience and knowledge gain from their individual families. In this essay, I will contrast and summarize each of nuclear, which is traditional, family and non-traditional families and also compare each of the families and examine how changing in non-traditional and nuclear families will affect people’s behaviors and minds in the view of sociologist and psychologist in order to argue how changing family affect individuals and the society.

For most of us, the family is considered as a well-known and comfortable institution. The perfect model of the ‘ideal’ family is still mostly considered to be consisted from two different sexes’ parents, and one or more children. Until quite recently, the sociology of the family was mostly functionalist and just in the last few decades has been challenged from various directions.

On the other hand, I can say, that the large family always helps if it is supported, in everywhere if we have a large family we can survive better at any place, Here I will give an example from bitLanders, If I have a big family here in shape of my friends, I can survive here better as they will guide me about everything of bitLanders, they will suggest me to do whatever I should do here.