It is basically observed that Indian wildlife laws are not that effective but it is totally the opposite of what has been perceived. Rather India has much more strong and stringent laws that prevails to wildlife conservation but it is totally imperative that conservationists aware themselves with these laws so that it would be more effective to enforce these in the country. It is also important that people are aware about these laws so that they should know that who controls the land or activity as to they are able to engage with the correct authorities and agencies.
The Indian Government has made legislations related to wildlife conservation and protection. Those are:
1) The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 last amended in 2006:
This act is the one major legal statue that controls activities such as it prohibits hunting, securing the wildlife habitat, formation of protected areas, control of trade of products generated from wildlife, establishment and regulation of zoos.
It also defines different types of protected areas that are:
a) National Parks
b) Wildlife Sanctuaries
c) Tiger Reserves
d) Conservation Reserves
e) Community Reserves
National parks and tiger reserves are dealt with more stringent laws and there is no intervention from any commercial or public activities in these area. The grazing and collection of forest wood is only allowed on the discretion of the Chief Wildlife Warden and there needs to be a bona fide for that activity that it is the need of themselves
The way that the hunting regulations were created it prevents over hunting. This is useful because species could go extinct without these regulations. The bag limit and the type of species that you can kill are ways that help prevent the act of over killing, which could cause the problem of endangerment.
Poaching animals is defined as the “illegal hunting or capturing of wild animals mainly in areas in which hunting is forbidden” . The main difference between poaching and hunting is the legal permission, indeed “hunting is regulated by the government, and hunters must obtain permits authorizing them to kill certain animals” .
This Act was to provide programs to protect species identified as either endangered or threatened. It also mandated Federal agencies and departments to protect endangered and threatened species in their own operations, as well as work with State and local agencies to further promote conservation and protection of identified species.
Laws were put in place to stop the great detriments in animal population, but the hunter ambitions overtake them and make them greedy and they use any way necessary to get their prize animal. One man who was caught Wesley Barrow said “ I did not care if I was caught I was set on my goal and I cared not what the repercussion of my action would be.” (wasser)This was said before his court date where he was found guilty of killing an animal in a protected area.At this point you're probably thinking why would a big game hunter and poacher work together. The reason they do is they're both after the same thing a big game animals even though they may have different motives like, one may be for a wall piece one while, the other before a paycheck but they're both still
Since the European colonization of eastern Africa, trophy hunting has been a highly debatable topic. During the early days of trophy hunting, dwindling numbers of some of the world’s most unique and prized wildlife was not a problem like it is today. Wildlife conservationists and hunters continue to debate the merits of legalized hunting on the economy and on the environment. However, not all hunters value the economic benefits and have passion for the outdoors. In fact, some of these hunters are conservationists themselves, who believe that it will allow for better conservation efforts in the long run. In another perspective, trophy hunters tend to downplay the reality of the killing part. To kill is to put to death, extinguish, nullify, cancel, or destroy. There is a fine line between conservation, and senseless killing of animals involved in trophy hunting.
ecological purposes. Various acts and pieces of legislation paired with advocacy on the part of
Big game laws should stay the same. It helps the animal population, it keeps from hurting other humans or animals and it brings in revenue. The hunters were all following the regulations the protected lion was off of the reserve and the hunter unknowingly killed the lion Cecil. If you buy a hunting license where do you think the money goes? It goes back to the conservation of that animal and the community. For more information go to
But what you have to realize 30 years ago, there was a Texas-sized area that contained about 300,000 elephants, and over the past three decades, poachers have killed all but 4,000 that still exist in Zakouma National Park” (“Scores of Elephants”). This quote goes to show that easy money is not the best money when the bet is placed on the head of wildlife. Animals that cannot be protected by national parks are at even bigger risk than those that are partially protected by weak laws. Even though poaching is an easier way of getting money and human society is growing, many animal species will become extinct and there will be no more wetlands or forestry left on planet Earth.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is charged with the management of fish, wildlife, and natural habitats. This agency is comprised of many affairs, such as the enforcement of federal wildlife laws, endangered species conservation, and managing the nation’s five hundred sixty national wildlife refuges (Allgov, 2017). The National Parks Service oversees managing the natural resources of the United States’ fifty-nine national parks (Allgov, 2017). The regulations and policies that govern these different agencies have changed drastically as different presidents have come in and out of office. Theodore Roosevelt, for example, created the Unites States Forest Service as a part of the Forest Reserve Act of 1891 (DOI, 2017). During his presidency, he reserved millions of acres, through executive orders, and turned it into national forests, including what is known as the Midnight Forests (FWS, 2017). The midnight forests are forests created by Theodore Roosevelt. President Roosevelt created the midnight forests as one last executive order before he signed an amendment to the nation’s land laws, which removed the power of the president to set aside land for national parks and forest with executive order (NPS, 2017). This amendment arose due to the special interest groups, loggers, and cattlemen who lost land from President Roosevelt’s executive orders (FWS, 2017). Also, additional policies commenced to be established towards conservation and protection for
regulate this but they refer back to the Animal Welfare Act. Even though this law was
- Compliance with relevant statutory controls, specifically the National Parks and Wildlife Act (1974) and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1979), is to be required for all development and heritage programs.
First of all, for trophy hunting should not be allowed because rules aren’t allows followed. When Cecil the lion got lured out of the park, the lion wasn’t even supposed to be lured out nor killed. This just proves some of the people don’t follow laws and some are dirty. Another reason how people don’t follow the rules is killing animals that can still breed. Some animals are endangered
Hunting is an important feature of preservation and administration. Hunters take so moderately few critters due to partial seasons, while in many places you can fish year-round. That associates to more pressure on the resource. Hunting can help sustain a population of healthy animals within an environment's ecological carrying capacity when natural checks such as predators are absent or very rare. However, hunting has also seriously contributed to the endangerment, extirpation and destruction of many animals. In most areas hunting can also interrupt natural
Hunting has become a heavily debatd topic in recent years. I believe there must be regulations on hunting Trophy hunting, also called big-game hunting since so many of these animals are inangred. I do not think a endangered animal should ever be hunted. However, if an animal population is healthy, I think hunting is fine as long as people was responsible.
Imagine the world without hunting laws and regulations, the ecosystem would be unbalanced. Beneficial hunting would go down and possibly lead to certain animal species extinction’s; therefore, to avoid detrimental changes in the ecosystem, people need regulations and laws to keep balance. Both society and the environment play a role in maintaining a balance between each other. For many years game wardens have helped patrol and protect the untamed environment. There are times where problems will arise and can be very difficult to handle, yet there is always a way to solve these problems. It just might take some time to put the plan into action to make a change.