In the film Poverty Outlaws, we are introduced to a group of women from Kensington, a neighborhood in North Philadelphia. While members of this group come from various backgrounds, they do share a few characteristics. They are all on welfare, poor, live in Philadelphia, food insecure, unemployed and there is not a male to be found for miles. In an attempt to survive, these women create a welfare union. The purpose of their union is to advocate for increased support for the poor and impoverished of Philadelphia. They use a variety of tactics in an attempt to achieve their goals. Some of their tactics I agree with; others that I don’t. In fact, some of their tactics and beliefs might even be considered immoral. So, why are they poor and …show more content…
Williams (2014), “No one can blame a person if her starts out in life poor, because how one starts out is not his fault. If he stays poor, he is to blame because it is his fault.” In his article, Dr. Williams makes the case that people are essentially poor out of their own free will. People make the decision to not graduate high school. People exercise their free will to have children outside of marriage. People exercise their free will to enter in and out of marriage. People exercise their free will to not take a job. People exercise their free will to engage in criminal behavior. By applying Dr. William’s theory of why people are poor to the women of Poverty Outlaw, it becomes crystal clear as to why they are poor. Of the four parts of the test (graduate from high school, get married before you have kids and stay married, work any job, and avoid criminal behavior) the women of the Kensington Welfare Union (KWU) either fail some or all of the tests laid out by Dr. Williams. Sherry, one of the founders and leaders of the KWU, dropped out of high school and lived out of a car at the age of sixteen. She was also pregnant and unemployed. In addition, Sherry leads the charge to take over the old welfare office, committing the crime of trespassing on government property and failing the fourth and final test of the William’s poverty test; avoid criminal behavior. Luckily, she is not charged. She is
Research have show that poor people have the same attitudes toward welfare, work, education, and marriage as the middle class. This research suggests that teen pregnancy and the live for the moment attitude is actually a result of the poor mentality instead of a cause.
Ruby Payne had been a major voice in guiding teachers and school districts through waters inhabited by poor people. She tried to effect change based on a mental image that’s where she went wrong. Payne asserts that children growing up in a culture of poverty do not succeed because they have been taught the "hidden rules of poverty," but
Linda Tirado, author of Hand to Mouth Living in Bootstrap America, tells her story of what it’s like to be working poor in America, as well as what poverty is truly like on many levels. With a thought-provoking voice, Tirado discusses her journey from lower class, to sometimes middle class, to poor, and everything in between. Throughout the read, Tirado goes on to reveal why poor people make the decisions they do in a very powerful way.
A Framework for Understanding Poverty is a book, written by Ruby K. Payne for the purpose of helping educators impact their students in poverty through opportunities. This book examines experiences from all economic classes in order to evaluate the differences in education among each class. Payne talks about the different types of poverty and the resources needed to be a stable and educated person. Poverty is “the extent to which an individual does without resources”.
With all of the media 's hatred of poor people, it must affect their self-confidence and how they view the American Dream. Through her experience, Jennifer Mayer has noticed that very problem. While working in the soup kitchen, she noticed that most of the people who came in lived in "survival mode" and only lived "day-to-day" with no real goals. They had no dreams of success because they believed it to be impossible (Mayer). One reason for this self-esteem issue is their lack of education. Since poor people rarely have a college education, they feel like they have no future. This can often cause them to give up on their dreams and resort to crime (Reef 225-226). Also, because poor people are below America 's social and economic system, they will often give up on their dreams.
Go to Chicago, New York, Paris or Madrid, on every street corner you see a person less advantaged, poor, and desperate. Then go in a store, see others carrying expensive bags, swiping their credit card left and right. We live in a world of extreme poverty, balance seems nonexistent. Poverty can result in broken homes and in turn, broken lives. In the book Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson, Walter Mcmillian’s adult life, Trina Garnett’s childhood and Antonio Nuñez’s domestic life show that poverty was the cause of their incarceration and determined the success of their lives.
I liked bell hook’s essay “Seeing and Making Culture: Representing the Poor”. Bell assesses the light in which higher class people view the poor or lower class. Bell hooks, also known as Gloria Watkins grew up in a small Kentucky town where her father worked as a janitor for the local post office. As one of seven children she was taught that money and material possessions did not make her a better person but hard-work honesty and selflessness determined character. Her hard work landed her acceptance into Stanford University. Although she received various scholarships and loans, her parents worried that she would not have enough for books and supplies or emergency funds. Regardless of this, belle went on to earn a Ph.D. Her experiences and education earned her a very good reputation and even an authority writing critiques on popular culture and diversity (hooks 431-432). She uses ideas in her essay “Seeing and Making Culture: Representing the Poor”, that stem from her own personal experiences with poverty to add credibility to her writing, as well as examples from pop culture and mass media to demonstrate how these representations portray the lower class in ways that radiate negative stereotypes. She wrote the essay because she saw how the poor had many assumptions made about them. It wasn’t until college thought that she made that discovery. She discovered how unjustly they were represented due to the
Being at the bottom in the United States means to be the poorest and to have the lowest socioeconomic status, these people usually work minimum wage jobs or don’t work at all and live off of welfare. The culture of poverty thesis states that ‘Poverty is caused by shortcomings in the poor themselves (Oscar Lewis, Macionis, J. 2004)’. Many people feel this way, but some blame society, ‘Poverty is caused by society’s unequal distribution of wealth and lack of good jobs (William Julius William, Macionis, J. 2004). Most people in US are poor or have a very small income which sides more with society being the blame for all these people struggling to support themselves in today’s economy (Macionis, J. 2004, p. 277). The functional model in sociology focuses on the social structures of low-wages (Merton, as cited by Carnochan, S. 2013) which is what most people in poverty are stuck living off of due to lack of education and opportunity. Some people argue that to maintain low prices for goods and services poverty and low-wage work is important and needed for our economy (Gans, as cited by Carnochan, S. 2013). Some people may believe this is true, usually those in a better social position, but some people have an opposing opinion to the low pay of some workers. The conflict model explains this inequality of wages in the work world, it also brings to attention how people with and without power experience inequality. For example, CEO’s with lots of
Charles Murray (1990) had developed a theory called the ‘underclass’, this theory categorises those living in poverty and defines them as non-working, inadequate and dangerous to society. Such writings have been an influence on the right realists and have a need to reinforce personal responsibility for an individual’s behaviour. Murray goes on to discuss two different types of underclass, firstly, the poor. These are people that only have low income but maintain their morals and standards and secondly, there are those with low income and their morals and standards match that. Those households with low standards are stereotyped as untidy and contain drunken and disorderly behaviour. He claims the men cannot keep jobs and the children are ill-educated resulting in antisocial behaviour and juvenile delinquency. This theory talks about a ‘fear of crime’ that would be instilled into communities by the underclass because the underclass is a classic example of the habitual criminal.
Poverty in the United States is an ongoing issue that needs more attention than it currently receives because a bulk of Americans are trapped struggling to survive in unbearable living conditions. Although the government has funded programs and there are organizations that donate to the poor, there are still numerous poor people who are suffering to get through another day. People usually disregard these issues simply because they do not understand how oppressive poverty. Jo Goodwin Parker, a writer who has decided to remain anonymous, presents the relevant issues of poverty in current day in her essay “What is Poverty?” to describe the conditions she has to live in. Parker reveals poverty’s oppressiveness
For centuries, Americans have prided themselves in today’s “classless” society, a fair democracy, opening the doors to opportunity and upward mobility. The fact remains, however, that roughly one in seven Americans still find themselves below the poverty line, a statistic given by the Census Bureau in 2010. With poverty so widespread, government officials and scholars alike have turned to other outlets for the reasons behind poverty, including the introduction of the term, “culture of poverty.” However, it is shocking to realize that the blame is oftentimes placed on the poor themselves, despite their numerous attempts to escape the cycle of poverty they find themselves in. With public perception of poverty at an-all time low, more and more of the general population are blaming poverty on the poor themselves due to laziness and lack of effort. If the poor are trying to improve their economical status, then why do they still find themselves in this vicious cycle, and what can we do to prevent it?
In Wisconsin, the locus of Collin’s and Mayer’s study, this meant W2, a workfare program. This system was created with the intention of create in poor women a dependence on the labor market—the idea that “for those who can work, only work will pay.” However the result was that many women became locked into low paying community service jobs that lacked the protections available to other workers, even in the low wage sector—many not even making the minimum wage. These jobs also provided little in terms of skill development, making it difficult for these women to obtain legitimate employment. Thus legislation enacted with the intent of to motivating poor women to become more active in the labor market placed certain limits on their freedom, including a further restriction on time and social mobility.
Poverty is very widespread and touches the lives of millions of Americans. Through the speeches of Russell Conwell (Acres of Diamonds 1915) and Samuel Gompers (What does the working man want? 1890) we see through their eyes how each man feels about this topic. Being in poverty is something that none of us want for ourselves. Even though we try our best sometimes it is something that is out of our hands and something we can’t avoid.
Poverty is a remarkably persistent problematic social challenge within the United States that has far-reaching implications. The magnitude and perplexity of poverty and its instigates are a massive predicament of both ethical and economic concern that has many proportions, which demands the country’s immediate attention.
The definition of poverty is a state in which income is insufficient to provide basic necessities such as food, shelter, or clothing. When one is in poverty, they adapt practices that differ from “mainstream” culture in order to adapt and survive economic deficiencies. The analysis of those practices is called the culture of poverty. The underclass plays a big role when it comes to the culture of poverty. Those in poverty set the culture that others may follow and ultimately what sociologists and others analyze. Some of the practices are illegal forms of work, like drug dealing. Other practices include living in multifamily households and swapping. William Julius Wilson, an American sociologist, has two arguments when it comes to the underclass and poverty. Wilson’s first argument is that class is more of an issue than race in determining life chances for people of color. His second argument states that the real culprit of poverty is discrimination, gentrification, deindustrialization, and globalization. Wilson’s ideas of race and class provide a different perspective on class inequalities.