Reliability has a long history as one of the key psychometric properties of a test, but a given test might not measure people equally reliably (Hu, Nesselroade, Erbacher, Boker, Burt, Keel & ... Klump, 2016). Test scores from some individuals might have considerably greater error than others. It has a lot to do with the consistency of the test subject’s performance on the test. While there are several methods for estimating test reliability, the four major types are inter-rater, test-retest, parallel, and internal consistency (Heneman, Judge, & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2012). Inter rater reliability is used to assess the point to which different raters give consistent estimates of the same occurrence. Interrater reliability offers a measure of the consistency of scores that could be expected across raters. Inter rater reliability is valuable because human raters will not essentially understand each answers the same way. Evaluating how an informal interview over dinner, a formal presentation to managers, and managerial evaluations of performance potential compare for this type of reliability is that the some raters may disagree as to how well certain replies sounded or may have a different feel of the subject’s skills and knowledge. …show more content…
The scores from the first encounter and to the second encounter can then be correlated in order to assess the test for stability over time period. The relationships between the subjects’ scores from the two different encounters are estimated, through statistical correlation, to determine how similar the scores are. Evaluating how an informal interview over dinner, a formal presentation to managers, and managerial evaluations of performance potential compare for this type of reliability is that this type of reliability shows the extent to which the test is able to yield scores across a time
Largely, the entire test proved thought provoking as this was a subjective test. Meaning everyone's values are not the same, everyone is not driven by the same motives. This could be problematic in obtaining valid results. It has given this writer cause to carefully examine assessments that are being administered clients. Reliability and validity have a great importance in how counselor should utilize assessments and can assist in finding appropriate instruments in order to be more effective with clients.
According to the technical manual, Test Validity can be defined as the degree to which empirical evidence and theory support the use and interpretation of the test (Schrank & McGrew, 2001). The main constructs and measures attained by the WJ III are resultant from the Cattell Horn Carrol theory of the cognitive abilities (CHC theory). Content validity, which is how well a test measures the behaviors it was intended to measure, was accompanied through requirement of a master test and cluster-content revision blueprint. Each cluster of the Woodcock- Johnson COG battery was created to heighted the range of validity measurement (Schrank & McGrew, 2001). This was done by providing two qualitatively separate narrow abilities included in the broad ability, as defined by CHC theory. The WJ III ACH was also knowledgeable by CHC theory. In order to strengthen
Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2013). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (8th Ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.
As you know, the Advanced Placement (AP) Psychology exam involves 100 multiple-choice questions and two free response essay questions. The goal of the exam is to accurately measure knowledge of psychological concepts and to communicate to colleges which students would most likely succeed in a college-level psychology course. Each year, few students receive composite scores of 1 and 5, and more students receive scores of 2, 3, or 4. Use the following terms to describe how the College Board most likely developed and evaluates the AP Psychology exam. • Recognition • Recall • Standardization • Normal curve • Reliability (test-retest reliability or split-half reliability) • Content validity • Predictive validity
Reliability generalization examines reliability of scores from tests and detect the causes of measurement error (Kline, 2005).
However, the researchers in this study could not transfer this reliability estimator to their study because they adapted the original measure. They selected a portion of the items from the English version and used them for the Hmong tasks.
I was in 8th grade when this occurred. I was with my friends in Theatre Class, working on our project and our scripts. One of the project's stated that we had to interview someone at the school. At that time, none of us were as outgoing as we are today. We were very timid and quiet, but I wanted to get out of my shell and start being talkative.
The reliability of an instrument contributes to the level of usability for empirical research (Whiston, 2009). Further, it refers to the replicability andstability of a measurement and whether it will result in the same assessment in the same individuals when repeated (Frankfort-Nachmias & Nachmias, 2008). When determining the reliability of an assessment, a reliability coefficient of at least .80 indicates a trustworthy level of reliability (Trochim, 2006).
The validity of a test if very important, because it can make or break a test. The purpose of a test is to measure something specific. If the test has low validity it is not measuring what it supposed to measure. The Holland codes validity is measured through the different personality types. The test has shown to accurately predict a possible career choice for each participants (O’Connell 1971).
The manual discusses internal consistency and test-retest in terms of reliability. Internal consistency is measuring how scores on individual items relate to each other or to the test as a whole. In two subsample studies, high internal consistency was found. In the first study, with a mixed sample of 160 outpatients, Beck, Epstein et al. (1988) reported that the BAI had high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach coefficient alpha = .92), and Fydrich et al. found a slightly higher level of internal consistency (coefficient alpha = .94). This means that the items on the BAI are all measuring the same variable, anxiety.
Research suggests the “…Halo error inflates within-rater observed correlations between dimensions because the idiosyncratic part of a rater’s overall impression (the halo error) affects ratings on all other rating dimensions” (Viswesvaran, Schmidet & Ones, 2005, p. 111). For example, the avalanche of resumes received at Worldwide Panel LLC for vacancies officials rejected several applicants just by asking them “What is your greatest weakness?”(Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 202). Another clear example is when one applicant answer was “I’m a perfectionist”, this made interviewers think he was not a good enough delegator and another applicant was too confident in his ability to get the job done well, so they were not chosen for the position (Kreitner
Assessors would chose instruments that answer the referral questions. Therefore, the chosen instrument must be able to provide information that is well-found and to accurately identify a targeted trait and/or phenomena (Groth-Marnat, 2009). A number of criticisms on the Rorschach are related to its reliability and validity. Such criticism pointed to the importance of organized coding system. Due to Rorschach’s passing shortly after publishing the test, the instrument was utilized without a standard system. The comprehensive system (CS), which was introduced by J. E. Exner, Jr., has provided much needed standardization to the assessment method (Groth-Marnat, 2009; Weiner, 1999, 2001). More recently, another group of researchers developed a system known as the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS) (Meyer & Eblin, 2012; see Meyer, Viglione, Mihura, Erard, & Erdberg, 2011). These systems have been proposed in the effort towards standardlization and increased validity (Choca, 2013). Of these two systems, CS is the most frequently used (Groth-Marnat,
There comes a time when we all come across a specific test such as school tests, driving test, or even as simple as food tasting test. However, there is a difference between regular tests and testing’s when referring to psychological testing. There are several different psychological tests that many psychiatrists, psychologists, and school counselors use to determine certain abilities, however each of the tests are used for a specific purpose. It is vital for the individuals to contain high knowledge of the tests before applying it to others.
Reliability is defined, within psychometric testing, as the stability of a research study or measure(s). Reliability can be examined externally, Inter-rater and Test-Retest, as well as internally; which is seen in internal consistency reliability methods.