The first test done for Klebsiella pneumoniae (the gram stain) indicated that this bacteria was rod shaped and therefore, using the dichotomous key the family of bacteria that were ruled out consisted of the genera Neisseria and Rodospirillum. The next tests that were vital to the identification process were the oxygen requirements and glucose fermentation tests. The test results gave us the confirmed family of our species which was Enterobacteriaceae. The negative oxidase test performed confirmed this. Once the lactose fermentation test was performed, many genera were ruled out, including: Salmonella, Serratia, Proteus, Providencia and Marganella. The genera that remained included: Escherichia, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, and Citrobacter. For …show more content…
it also belongs to the normal intestinal flora of humans Many bacteria from this genus, including Klebsiella pneumonia are capable of nitrogen fixation. This bacteria is an extremely virulent bacteria in part due to its polysaccharide capsule which makes it more difficult for phagocytosis to occur and also allows the bacteria to easily adhere to and colonize the respiratory and urinary tracts. This virulent bacteria has been given the title of superbug which refers to its resistance to many antibiotics. Its resistance to antibiotics is related to the presence of carbapenemase, an enzyme, in the organism which makes it resistance to carbapenamase. It is only pathogenic when the immune system is compromised due to a chronic illness or debilitation and therefore it is acquired mostly in healthcare settings, mainly long-term care facilities. When it is pathogenic, the bacteria is commonly the causative agent of bacterial pneumonia, a necrotizing lobar pneumonia, and urinary tract infections. Since this bacteria is resistant to many antibiotics and is very virulent, a combination of antibiotics are used to treat it including levofloxacin, ampicillin, meropenem, terizidone and many others. The control of this bacteria is aimed at the prevention of transmission in hospitals with strategies that include contact isolation precautions, proper hand washing and textbook nursing
The purpose of this lab was to identify two unknown bacteria from a mixed culture. The reason for identification of unknown bacteria was to help students recognize different bacteria through different biochemical tests and characteristics. This is important in the medical field because identification of unknown bacteria can help treat a patient by knowing the contributing source of a disease. Also knowledge of different bacteria helped others make antibiotics used today. This lab was completed by using the methods learned thus far in identification of bacteria.
The first result of importance was the result of the Gram stain. The observations of the unknown bacteria from the slant culture after Gram staining showed that the unknown bacteria were Gram negative bacilli (Image 1). After determining the unknown bacteria was Gram negative, an oxidase test was conducted on a sample from the slant culture. The cotton swap with the sample of bacteria did not change color when the oxidase reagent was applied, thus providing a negative result. With a negative oxidase test, further tests were conducted to determine various characteristics of the unknown bacteria. A MR-VP broth was inoculated with a sample from a slant culture of unknown bacteria. After incubation, the methyl red reagent was added to the broth, and the broth turned red, providing a positive result (Image 2). An EMB agar streak plate was inoculated with a sample from a slant culture of the unknown bacteria, and after incubation, growth was found on the plate, providing a positive result (Image 3). A Citrate agar slant was inoculated, and after incubation, growth was found on the media, providing a positive result (Image 4). A Urea agar slant was inoculated, and after incubation, the agar had changed from a peach color to a bright pink color, providing a positive result (Image 5). Using the flowchart (Figure 1) developed from the Table of Expected Results, the lab partners started at the oxidase test. Given the negative result of the oxidase test, the flowchart is
As a facultative anaerobe, Klebsiella is usually found in human intestines or stool, where it is harmless. However, it has recently become a more important pathogen if it gets in the respiratory tract or bloodstream of a person with poor health or a compromised immune system (Guentzel, ). It commonly causes nosocomial, or hospital-acquired infections, which are contracted through the contaminated hands of healthcare workers, catheters or other equipment that is not sterile. These infections normally occur in patients that are being treated in the hospital for some other reason. Some examples of Klebsiella induced syndromes are Urinary Tract Infections, bacteremia, pneumonia, diarrhea, meningitis and osteomyelitis. According to the Pennsylvania Department of Health (2017), the mortality rate of a Klebsiella infection is around ninety percent in most countries. Additionally, it has become increasingly hard to treat infections caused by Klebsiella due to its ability to resist certain
This experiment was conducted to find the genus and species of an unknown bacteria prescribed by the lab teacher, which was unknown bacteria GA3 in my case. Identification of unknown bacteria techniques are used on an every day basis to figure out what type of bacteria it is and to find the best method of how to treat a patient with this bacteria (1). All five “I’s” of Microbiology were used in the testing for the unknown culture. Inoculation was used several times to put the unknown culture into agar plates or into biochemical test tubes. After Inoculation of these tubes or plates, they always were placed into the incubator for further growth and development. Isolation was used to make sure we got the correct bacteria we were testing for. After each further isolation, we gram stained the culture and inspected the culture under a microscope to further help in the identification process of the unknown bacteria. Multiple tests were done on the unknown culture to make sure we were confident in what kind of bacteria the unknown was.
An unknown bacterium was handed out by the lab instructor. The methods that have been learned so far in identifying bacteria were applied to this unknown. Procedures were followed as stated in the lab manual and biochemical test handouts. The first procedure that was done was a gram stain followed by a streak of the unknown on a TSA plate in order to determine the gram reaction and observe the colony morphology. After that, specific biochemical tests were performed for gram positive, since unknown number five was determined to be gram positive rod. The other tests were performed in this order: Mannitol Salt (MSA) streak, Blood Agar streak, Catalase test, Nitrate Reduction test, and Phenyl
The main idea of this experiment was to correctly identify the unknown bacteria, #3. Identification of unknown bacteria yields multiple benefits in many different areas in the research of microorganisms. In this experiment I performed many different test dealing with things such as the presence of enzymes, fermentation abilities and different chemical reactions. Observations made from the tests were then compared to a gram negative unknown chart in order to identify the bacteria. Based off of my results and the chart, I concluded the bacteria #3 was the bacteria Escherichia coli. E. coli is most commonly found in the intestines of warm blooded organisms. Most E. coli strands are non pathogenic however, there are strands
In this experiment, an unknown bacterium was given to each individual student. The main purpose of this lab was to identify the given unknown bacteria going through a series of biochemical tests as one of the gram negative bacteria among six different Gram negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium. At the very beginning, streaking method; T-streak technique was used to isolate the pure colonies. For the morphological identification of unknown bacteria, Gram Stain Method was done. Biochemical tests that were conducted for the experiment
The purpose of this study was to identify the unknown bacterium using biochemical tests and various methods that had been learned from previous the microbiology laboratory class. Identifying the unknown bacterium was determined by separating and differentiating possible
In the world of microbiology it is vitally important to be able to discern the identities of microorganisms. Not only is it important in a lab setting but as well as in healthcare in general. Properly identify what strain of bacteria a person has will aid in the proper medicine and dose given. Throughout the semester we have learned about different types of bacteria and certain test that can clearly identify them. The purpose of this lab report is to identify a Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacterium. Using all the knowledge of procedures and lab techniques identify the unknown and discuss all the tests you performed.
The bases of this experiment was to discover the identify of the unknown from three possible specimens: Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter aerogenes. Utilizaing the T streak technique, the bacteria was isolated into pure colonies for further study. The Gram Stain method was used to identity the morhphology of the bacteria such as the shape and whether the bacteria was Gram positive or Gram negative. Biochemical test were also used to help identify the unknown bacteria. The biochemical test used was the Triple Sugar Iron Agar, Sulfur Indole Motility test, Methyl Red test, Voges-Proskauer test, Citrate test, Urease test, and the Gelatin test. After observing the morphology of the bacteria using the Gram Stain method and utilizing all the possible biochemical test, the bacteria was identified to be Enterobacter aerogenes.
pneumoniae I believe I have a subspeciesof K. pneumoniae perhaps K. pheumoniae ozaenae or K. pneumoniae rhinoscleromatis. Indole, MR-VP and Citrate will vary among different subspecies according to bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. The reason why I decided on K. pneumoniae over E. aerogenes is because of the gelatin and motile test. According to bergey's manual, Enterobacter liquefies gelatin very slowly and in addition E. aerogenes will test positive for motility. To further differentiate K. pneumoniae from Enterobacter and narrow down the exact species of K. pneumoniae the urea hydrolysis assay could have been the determining factor. Subspecies ozaenae and rhinosclermatis will result in a negative reaction for VP but bergey’s Manual indicates a positive reaction for
The morphology of Klebsiella pneumoniae is a bacillus shaped bacterium, which means it looks like a rod. This bacterium is also a non-motile and Gram-negative. This means that wherever the bacterium was inoculated into an agar, it only grew in that spot and did not grow outwards. Being gram-negative means that the bacterium has a thin layer of peptidoglycan and stains red during the Gram-staining process. Klebsiella pneumoniae is an encapsulated bacterium, where the capsule
2. Introduction: Each student was given unknown bacteria and was instructed to perform a variety of experimental tests that would help to identify their bacteria. During the process of identification, the unknown bacteria was added to many different testing medias using aseptic technique. They are as follows: lactose fermentation on eosin methylene blue (EMB), TSI (Triple Sugar Iron agar), Phenol red sucrose, the SIM test, H2S by SIM, IMViC (indole, motility, voges-proskauer, and citrate), Urease (urea broth), PDase (Phenylalanine Deaminase), Lysine Decarboxylase, and Ornithine Decarboxylase. Colonial morphology on EMB was used to
How I determined that my bacteria were Pseudomonas fluorescens. The first test I began with was a gran stain to figure out if it was a gram positive or gram negative bacteria which removed half of the bacteria. With the knowledge that the bacteria were gram negative, I did the EMB test and the basic sugar tests glucose, lactose, and sucrose. The results for EMB on the bacteria was a non-fermenter, further limiting the choices. It was during the test on the sugars, that it was possible to zero in on the last couple bacteria. These test, which showed up all negative leaving me with only three bacteria, since the other all negative for sugars had to be a cocci and mine was a rod. Therefore, I was left with two test left to help, Urease and Nitrate.
Introduction: Through the conduction of numerous experiments, the identity of two bacterial isolates was determined. The tested specimen was an unknown sample of a mixed culture of two different species of bacteria. The first step that was taken was obtaining a pure culture of each species of bacteria by isolating one species from the other. Once isolation was complete, the isolated cultures were tested using procedures that had been performed during previous lab sessions. A gram stain was performed on the two isolates. The isolate which had tested gram negative was then tested for the presence of cytochrome C and lactose fermentation. For the gram positive isolate, cell shape was determined and a catalase test was performed.