Laissez Faire 's Faire Leadership Style

The theory of leaders can be autocratic, a person who doesn’t consider the person undertaking the task only getting the results. A democratic leader takes opinions of the staff and understands how they believe the best results can be achieved, whereas Laissez-faire style leaves the experienced staff to implement the work processes.

Tenets of servant leaders include: the ability to listen with understanding and keep an open mind, hear without judgement, can deal with ambiguity and complex issues, provides clear goals and directions, uses honesty, and has vision (Marquis & Huston, 2014). The laissez-faire leadership style in contrast to the servant leadership style is a nondirected leadership style with little or no control, and decision making is dispersed throughout the group, which can lead to apathy among the staff and frustration (Marquis & Huston,

Grojean, Resick & Diskson (2004) suggest that leaders are responsible for facilitating their follower’s to become capable and guide them to improving their capabilities and strengths. Differentiating between different leadership styles can be done in a number of ways. It was determined that the traditional styles of leaders include authoritian (autocratic), democratic, permissive (laissez-faire) and bureaucratic (Viinamäki, 2009).

The natural laws of economics would regulate the market, a principle known as laissez-faire economics. This concept is endorsed by The Wealth of Nations, written by Adam Smith, the father of free market capitalism. One of Smith’s followers, David Ricardo, was a major proponent of laissez-faire economics. In his 1817 publication, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Ricardo had written “Wages should be left to the fair and free competition of the market, and should never be controlled by the interference of the legislature.” (Document 2). He goes on exclaiming that government interventions, like the Poor Laws, were detrimental to bettering conditions for the lower class. It decreased the ability of the rich to make a profit, while also preventing members of the lower class from living more comfortably. Ricardo’s strong beliefs in the free market is reinforced by his Iron Law of Wages, which stated all attempts to improve the real income of workers were ineffective and that wages would inevitably remain near the minimum wage to survive. Similarly, Thomas Malthus, one of Ricardo’s predecessors, asserted that because the rich did not have the means to support the poor, let alone the responsibility to do so, therefore it was wrong for them to beg for the money (Document 1). His work addressed the cries of the working class for government support through entitlements. This strong opinion against big

There are four main leadership styles, the first being Autocratic style which the manager retains as much control and decision making authority as possible, the manager does not give employees any input or consultation. The next is Bureaucratic which is where the manager manages ‘by the book’ which is where everything must be completed according to procedure and protocol. Mangers using this style will only consult with those above them in the chain of command. They simple enforce the rules of the workplace. The next style of leadership is Laissez-Faire which is also known as the ‘hands off’ approach to management. The manager usually provides little or no direction and give employees as much freedom as possible. All power is given to employees and they are to dictate their own work ethics. The last leadership style is the Democratic style which is also known as the participative style and this is where employees are encouraged to be a part of the decision making process. The democratic manager keeps their employees informed about everything that affects

Kurt Lewin, and a team of researchers, studied youth leaders. They studied youth leaders in activity groups. Based on those studies, it was concluded that there were three obvious and leading leadership styles. Kurt Lewin used the terms democratic, laissez-faire, and autocratic to describe the leadership styles. He also chose one that he thought was superior compared to the other two. The autocratic style is when a single person

Have you ever had a leader that inspired you to develop your own leadership traits? “A leader is someone who demonstrates what’s possible” (Mark Yarnell, 2015). There are numerous leadership styles. Each of the numerous leadership styles can be beneficial if utilized in an appropriate means. I have chosen three leaders and their unique leadership styles to discuss in this paper. The unique styles that will be discussed are situational leadership, transformational leadership, and laissez-faire leadership. I will also discuss each leader’s approach, their fundamental leadership principles, and how each leader used their style within their profession.

The core idea in Laisse-Faire is one of non-involvement by government in the workings of a nations economy. This is typified by a lack of regulation or interference in the capitalist marketplace, allowing businesses and industries to compete for consumers dollars based on the efficiency of their production and the quality of their products. The roots of Laisse-Faire lay in the writings of English economist Adam Smith in his work The Wealth of Nations. In The Wealth of Nations, Smith hypothesized that no government regulation was necessary because the competition among businesses will insure that the best and most necessary products at ideal prices will be produced. This "self-regulating market" would, according to Smith, be guided by an "invisible hand". During the late 1800's, as the US economy expanded at a furious rate, the lack of government regulation over the economy led to many abuses by businesses. As a result by the Progressive Era of the early 1900's, the government was forced by public outcry to begin to enact consumer and worker protections via

With that in mind, leadership theory has identified four management styles--authoritarian, democratic, participatory, and laissez-faire. There is inherently nothing wrong with any of them; all have their place at any given time. But it's the communication aspect that is important when implementing any given method of leadership that makes an organization rise or fall, and determines if respect is retained or lost within the group. Stated another way, the problem does not lie in the styles themselves, but rather in the presentation.

Right now I volunteer at the Student Health Services Clinic on campus, and my supervisor Ms. Susannah Perez-Fields leadership style are both bureaucratic and participative. When working at the clinic you have to follow a set of guidelines from the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which explains why one of her leadership styles is bureaucratic.

Out of these three Lewin found that the best style of leadership is Democratic, Autocratic leads to an upheaval where the Liaises-Faire approach creates unmotivated individuals who lack effort. (Lewin, LIippit and White, 1939).

Laissez faire is the absence of effective leadership (Yukl G, 2010). Laissez faire leaders ignore problems and follower (Yukl G, 2010) and they do not contribute to the growth of the follower ( (Northouse, 2007). Feedback, rewards and leader involvement are totally absent in this type of leadership hence reduced organisational commitment.

An effective leader influences their employees in a desired manner to achieve goals and objectives. Different leadership styles can affect an organization’s effectiveness and performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the review of literature on various leadership styles over the past years and how effective and ineffective different leadership styles are in the workplace.

Murphy (2005) maintains that leaders are accountable for helping their follower’s to become efficient and support them to develop their strengths and abilities. Distinguishing and categorising between different leadership styles can be done in several ways, (Gopee and Galloway, 2009). In this essay traditional classification of authoritian (autocratic), democratic, permissive (laissez-faire) and bureaucratic styles of leaders will be discussed.

The last style is called laissez-faire leadership. Here leader usually participates minimally and let team members find their own way out by allowing complete freedom in decision making (Simmons and Striley, 2014).