CONTENT
S.NO | TOPIC | 1 | Introduction about the case | 2 | Analyse the problem with the case using OB theories and concepts. | 3 | How should Barton make her case for executive education? | 4 | Reflection upon our experience of working in a group. | 5 | Conclusion | 6 | Referencing |
ABSTRACT
Karen Barton, Zendal Pharmaceuticals (senior vice president of HR) ,was annoyed when COO Palmer scorched her executive education budget by 75%.The first thought that came to Barton mind that it was a mistake, but it wasn’t a fault as Palmer patiently told Barton, sales were down by 26% and there was $300 million debts Zendal took on when it acquired Premier Pharmaceuticals, as a result Barton’s budget wasn’t the only one
…show more content…
THEORIES: 1. Vroom’s theory of expectancy: “Theory deals with the variables of motivation and their interrelation”.
Employee
Effort
Performance
Reward
According to the block line diagram of VTOE we can correlate the case as: (a) Employee : executives (b) Effort : that are made by Barton (c) Performance: all the performance criteria can be given to Barton and her team members. (d) Reward: enrolment of executives as managers and some increment of position.
2. Leadership theory: “it is the process of influencing others towards the accomplishment of goals. It is the ability of a manager to induce subordinates to work with confidence and zeal”
Behavioural theory of leadership: “this is related to the behaviour of the leader that it is somewhere related to what the leader does instead of hi traits”.
According to the above theories of leadership we can relate to our case study as follows:
Barton instead of acting as a manager acted as a leader thinking of the welfare of various executives who could be projected by executive thinking.
Q2. How should Barton make her case for executive education?
Ans. Barton should have focused on creating a quantitative ROI that the other executives buy into or should have revised her training program so that it does have measurable outcomes for a quantitative ROI. In order to make her case for executive education to palmer she should have
The next big era of leadership theories was the Rational Management era. When the previous era failed to determine exact traits that could consistently be identified in great leaders, a shift occurred to begin looking at how these leaders behaved, and what made them into great leaders, rather than who they were in a specific sense. This was a major shift from thinking that people were born leaders, to now considering that perhaps leaders could be made, or trained to become leaders. The first of these theories, beginning in the early 1950’s, were the behavior theories. The focus of these theories was to study what these leaders do, and
In this company, the CEO, Harold Redd, was driven to implement some change because the organization consisted of workers who only had basic skills in computer assembling and troubleshooting. Given that the company had very few
“Leadership is a process of social influence, which maximizes the efforts of others, towards the
The leader behavior approach is the focus of what people do as a leader or leadership style rather than the characteristics leaders inherit as a leader. It is the assumption that the actions of a person opposed to their innate mental state. Because leaders can learn through teaching and observation; specific behaviors are the focus of a leader. An important study of this theory was conducted by the Ohio State University, and the purpose was to identify common leadership behaviors. The study and research uncovered that there are two linked groups of behavior.
Leadership entails guiding others to realize particular goals using a variety of skills (Sullivan & Garland, 2011); Weihrich & Koontz, 2008). Likewise, Spector (2006) defined leadership as the art of influencing others to readily and actively endeavour towards achieving goals set by the team. Additionally, Spector (2006) emphasized that there is a shared theme that leadership comprises influencing individual belief systems, behaviours and feelings. As such, the smooth running of an organization requires effective leadership.
The essay classifies leadership into four key approaches: (1) trait approach, (2) behaviour approach, (3) the
In today’s competitive world, leadership skills are crucial for both personal and professional development. Leadership is an important function of management which helps an individual or a business to maximize efficiency and to achieve goals. Leadership has different meanings to various authors.Most commonly, leadership is defined as influence, that is, the art of influencing people so that they will strive willingly and enthusiastically toward the achievement of group goals. (Koontz). Leadership is the process of influencing the activities of either formal or informal group in the task of goal setting and goal achievement. A leader is one whose magnetic personality innervates people for some cause. Not by words, but by their actions is
The contents and assignment in this course has helped me understand the various theories of leadership and how different leadership styles can have a negative or positive effect on followers and organizations. The leadership theories helped me understand the concept of leadership better because it educates me on the different leadership options that are available. Leadership and followership is not based on specific characteristics. Leaders must draw from things and approaches to find the right style. A follower’s attitude determines the way a leader leads. According to Johnson (2011) “Being a good follower means ensuring your boss is supported, but only if he is making optimum decisions”.
Question “3”: Behavioural theory of leadership (explain one theory by linking it with the case study):
In corporate America the term used to describe a person in a position of power is “Manager”. A leader can be a manager, but a manager is not necessarily a leader. Leaders motivate, challenge, and influence others to achieve goals. Great leaders have the necessary skills and attributes which allow them to connect with the team and organization. Being a leader is not the same as managing an organization. Leader’s posses the interpersonal skills needed to influence others to achieve a goal willingly. Leading is a major part of a manager’s job. Leaders do not need to be a manager to lead people, but managers must know how to lead as well as manage.
Jim has asked Monroe to design a compensation package for himself as Director Business Operations because Jim wanted to assess how Monroe reacts when faced by unexpected challenges. Jim has sent a template of the compensation Package and asked him to analyze and work on following areas of the package.
Once David had made the decision to form a team, he started by hiring Brian Doyle. Brian was a seasoned consultant and would be able to offer knowledge in high-technology. Although, David had been working on this concept for some time, he failed to ensure all the stakeholders had buy-in. He did talk to a few people within the company, but never had a formal meeting with Whitney to outline his goals for the team. Also, David expected Whitney and Brian to work on any crossover of stock analysis among each other without his assistance. However, due to the past one-on-one working relationship between David and Whitney she was ill prepared for how to deal with Brian or his role within JFP. David compounded this by not providing leadership, guidance or accountability when he
Leadership has been a topic that has been researched for a long time in many disciplines. Leadership as a personality focuses on the characteristics of an individual that gives them power to act as leaders. There is leadership as an attribution this approach views leadership as phenomenon that causes group of followers to have outcomes.(Wu et al, 2010, 90).Researchers have used the following approaches to study leadership; they are mainly trait, behavior, power influence, situation and integrative approaches. Trait approaches focuses on the characteristics, values, skill and personality of leaders. Behavior approaches is focused on the leaders behaviors, differentiating between the behavior of ineffective and effective leaders. Integrative approach combines all the approaches to have a holistic picture of the process, outcomes and determinants of leadership. The approach that this paper uses is situational approach that is not leader centered but more on the significance of the context as an influence of leadership. Leaders should be able to choose the leadership quality appropriate to a particular situation.
In order to employ this new program, Eitel must use his sources of power to convince Fenway that this solution is worth the $7.2 million. His positional power source comes in the form of formal authority. He is the CEO who was chosen by Fenway (who actually had to convince him to leave his former post at Interface, Inc.) specifically for his track record of 5 successful transformations. His proven track record, work ethic and effort are personal forms of power that he can also leverage to persuade Fenway. When he took over as CEO at Simmons, he began making changes immediately. Eitel made a heavy gamble on a new mattress product, completely reorganized top management and spent $3.8 million to fire 14 executives, and altered the organizational structure to promote the “18 of one” concept. He has a go-getter attitude and isn’t intimidated by the fear of failure; he came in with a plan and right away began to execute it.
Then, even if the vision seemed clear to Harold, his role in implementing it wasn’t a success.