Essay 1.[LO 1] Process, Practices and Purposes Leadership
Leadership clearly defines as the action of leading a group of people or an organization, or ability to lead.
Here I discuss two styles of leadership that is:
• Autocratic Leadership
• Participative Leadership
Below I discuss each style in details with example
1. Autocratic Leadership
This style of leadership is described by controlling the individuals of the team over all choices and little contribution from the team leader in the association. This authority style has gotten to be something of a vestige in today 's modern conditions for businesses. The reason for this is because most of the representatives work better without the bossiness of their supervisor around …show more content…
2. Participative Leadership:
This style of leadership builds up a cheerful way of going through the strategies for a business to work. The supervisors with participative style back-off and permit their team member to tap their inventively and think freely, while as yet keeping up enough control to direct the general vision of groups without forcing their own vision on their choices. To put it plainly, leaders give them a considerably more prominent lead and are all the more trusting of choices. It enhances the comprehension of issues required by the individuals who must complete their choices. Certain individuals are more dedicated to activities where they have included in the significant leadership. Participative managers are not so much aggressive but rather more community oriented when taking a shot at joint objectives. At the point when managers settle on choices made by the team and all agreed on that together, the social duty to each other is more prominent and subsequently expands their dedication to the choice. A few people choosing together settle on preferred choices over one individual alone.
Example: Donald Trump The personality itself seen as more of a dictator rather than an executive, Trump
Leadership is “the fusion of heart and mind, selfless action, encourage betterment of others, and to make a difference. It is the process of influencing
In authoritarian leadership, the leaders make the decisions without the involvement or input of the group members. Making
The results of my Leadership Style Assessment was a Participatory Leader. I believe that the results were accurate. I try to listen and understand to everyone’s point of view before making a decision regarding others at work. “Participative leadership also known as Democratic Leadership Style is a method of leadership that involves all team members in terms of identifying important goals as well as developing strategies and procedures to achieve the goals. From this point of view, participative style of leadership can be perceived as a leadership style that relies primarily on functioning as a facilitator that the one who simply issues commands or orders or making assignment for each member of the team.” ("Participative Leadership," p. 1-2) The definition of Participative Leader to me means a Leader that listens and considers every point of view before making a final decision.
An authoritative leader addresses the end but generally gives workers freedom to innovate, experiment and take risks. The authoritative style works best for organizations that are off track, it helps in creating a new course and fresh long-term vision. The affiliative style strives to keep employees happy to create harmony among. The style has a positive effect on communication. People who like one another a lot talk lot. They share ideas, inspirations leading to flexibility, innovation and risk taking. This style should only be employed when trying to build team harmony. The democratic style allows leaders to build consensus through participation. By spending time getting people’s ideas, a leader is able to build trust, respect and commitment. This style works best when a leader is uncertain about best direction however, it does not make sense if employees are not competent. Pacesetting is a leadership style that expects excellence and self-direction. The leader is obsessive about doing things better and faster, and expects the same of everyone around
What is leadership? Leadership by definition is the ability of an individual or organization to guide other individuals, teams, or organizations. Without leadership many would just follow one another's actions like blind sheep. Many of the powerful shifts in American history were started by men and women who made the decision to guide and instruct one another rather than being a follower.
Leadership is defined as a relationship between an individual and a group of followers in which goal attainment of the group is influenced by the leader. Leadership in general said to be an art, which can
Authoritarian leaders are the leaders who like to do all the group decisions on their own and tell other group members what to do and how to do it. This type of leadership is very beneficial when you are in need of a quick decision or faced with some type of crisis. This type of decision making can easily be abused and can often be viewed as being bossy and over controlling. Leaders who use this style may provoke dependence, criticism, dissatisfaction, and aggression from their group members (Forsyth, 1990). According to Gladding 2012, authoritarian leaders do not ask for consideration or suggestions from group members; instead, they structure and direct their groups according to their own wishes, purposes, and the information available to them. A task group could benefit more from an Authoritarian leader. Tasks groups focus on accomplishing specific goals. According to Gladding 1994, “with task groups, an
In participative leadership, the leader of a group usually makes the final decisions, but only after consulting other team members for their input. Team members are inspired and motivated by this type of leadership which helps the leader’s decisions to be more widely accepted and adopted by the members (Reilly, 2011). In 1978, James Burns wrote a book about leadership styles in which he described the participative leader style as a type of
In the 1930’s Kurt Lewin argued three major styles of leadership Autocratic, Democratic and Laissez-fair (Manktelow, n.d.). Kurt’s simple but effective categorized leadership models provided a foundation to many different leadership theories. An Autocratic leader is one who makes decisions without the help or input of others. Because this leader doesn’t consult with the team, team members may feel as though their opinion doesn’t matter thus losing a team oriented atmosphere. This type of leadership may be seem as demoralizing and lead to high turn over rates and absenteeism (Manktelow, n.d.). Team members may feel unimportant and therefore take less ownership of team outcomes. A Democratic leadership style however is the almost the exact opposite of
My personal definition for leadership is a position someone puts themselves in to help society improve, leadership is about setting an example for your fellow peers that is positive and determined to do right. Leadership is also about teamwork, as a leader needs followers and the best leaders are the ones that learn from
According to Business Dictionary.com, leadership is defined as the individuals who are the leaders in an organization, regarded collectively. It also can be define as the activity of leading a group of people or an organization or the ability to do this. Leadership involves the establishing of a clear vision, sharing the vision with other so that they will follow willingly, providing the needed information, knowledge, and methods to realize the vision and coordinating and balancing the conflicts interests of all members and stakeholders.
In the textbook Leadership is defined as ‘the process of influencing an organized group toward accomplishing its goals’ (Hughes, Ginnet & Curphy 2015, p. 5). Leadership involves leader, followers, and situation.
For a quick review, the definition of leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group or individuals, to achieve a common goal.