Libertary Ideology In The World: Article Analysis

The development of the communist manifesto in the European region has led to the influencing of the different structures present in the area. The communist manifesto has resulted in the formation of holy alliances in the European region. It is due to the effects of the Manifesto that Marx developed the journal to address the issue. The importance of this journal is to highlight the sociological problems that have resulted from the manifesto. The fact that the manifesto has been highlighted by the European powers to be a force that influences the activities conducted in the region. This paper thus seeks to highlight important aspects that will be incorporated in the analysis of the communist manifesto developed by Marx and its significance

1. Explain why scholars and others say that the term “race” should not be used.

They discuss how race came about five thousand years ago. This concept states that the idea of race started in India but many claims to have first invented race. The person that is usually credit with this discovery was a man named Francois Bernier. The author also go in to detail about the history behind many races that include African Americans, Native Americans, Japanese Americans, Hispanics and many more. The authors concluded that even though number of crimes among many racial groups has varied in the past, the crimes that committed by these racial groups usually stay the same. It is also said that along with a certain race committed specific kinds of offenses, they usually have the same kind offenses committed against them. One thing I found incredibly important in this text was the comparison of DNA. Most people will not believe that we are biologically different. I did not realize until reading this text that a molecular biologist could tell the race of an individual through their

Author Ytasha Womack describes early on that "Blackness is a technology" (p.27) and "race simply didn't exist prior to 500 years ago" (p.42). She explains the idea of race as a type of technology ( a man-made creation). In other words race is something that is created. What Womack means is that race is something that hasn’t always existed, because it is something that was created. It was an idea created by white Europeans as a means to justify slavery. These people had the power to create racism to justify slavery and enforce it.

I have to say this was the first time I looked at race and ethnicity as being “socially constructed”. I had to really look at what the definition was and what it really meant. After reading the article you provided and chapter 2 in the book, and also doing a little surfing to find other articles on the subject. I agree with Mr. Johnson that race is “socially constructed”.

The article’s main concern discusses about sovereignty. This is considering affecting white people in general since the reason in order that they feel like if they had got the power that they were taken away from them a long time ago so now they are reacting back with violence. In the article many violence is used towards the colored people and is shown that the people with color are now scared of what can something else can happen.The white’s now feel like if they can do more when the new leader of the U.S. gave them the feeling that they have the power to do anything.

During his lecture, “Clear and Present Safety” Michel A. Cohen discusses what he calls an incontrovertible truth—that America is safer than it has ever been. Cohen argues that the United States spends too much on its military and not enough on other issues such as climate change and pandemic disease. At several intervals Cohen mentions China’s rise as a global rival to the U.S. However, he claims the U.S need not worry about China because China is only focused on regional issues. Cohen also cites that China spends 9 times less on its military than the U.S. Another area where Cohen thinks the world is safer than it realizes, is the creation of new democracies. Cohen makes the argument that there are more democracies in the world than ever before (117) and that there are fewer military conflicts taking place (30, down from 53 in 1992). American citizens and policy makers, according to Cohen, incorrectly believe a false narrative that the world is growing more dangerous; and to support this he cites a study conducted in 2008 by the Center for American

"The civil rights movement had questioned America's commitment to equality and brought the issue of social justice more forthrightly to the table of public consideration" (Schultz, 2014 p 465). Liberalism in the United States is the defined as a philosophy of what was called unalienated rights which means they cannot be repealed or restrained by human law. Modern Liberalism has many examples such as women’s rights and also voting rights. The civil rights movement was a struggle for social justice during the 50’s and the 60’s where you saw blacks try to gain equal rights under the U.S. law since slavery was abolished after the civil war. One of the most noted was the landmark trial Brown vs The Board of Education of Topeka Kansas was ruled that

“Republicans are for both the man and the dollar, but in case of conflict the man before the dollar.” This quote, by Abraham Lincoln describes some of the core principles behind Republicanism. Those core ideas are to help United State’s citizens first and the economy seconds. Republicanism is a belief that the United States should take a more conservative approach in its economic and social policies, and people believe in it because they think that a hands off government approach in which there is less government control over businesses would be beneficial to themselves and to the United States as a whole. Understanding what Republicans believe creates a dialogue about policies that should be made in society and allows others, such as Democrats, to find common ground that they can work together on to solve problems in the United States.

Political writer and freelance journalist, Hany Ghoraba once stated, “People are naturally born as Libertarians till governments and oppressive societies force them to adopt their ideologies and their ways.” Ghoraba makes this reference to the libertarianism as if it the stance holds a sort of innocence. Libertarianism in laymen’s terms is defined as maximum freedom and minimum government. Further explaining this stance, the libertarian goal is to elevate freedom of choice, political freedom, and individual judgement. Libertarianism at first glance may look to be naïve, because it is mainly determined on the ability of honesty from human beings, but in a just society I believe libertarianism is the perfect political and social structure.

My essay is going to be about the racism that’s in the book Heart of Darkness. There is racism being shown in the book plenty of times. Racism is the belief that a particular race is superior or inferior to another race and a person’s social moral traits are predetermined by his or her inborn biological characteristics. In the book you can see how the europeans were racist toward the blacks. You can see how the Europeans are think the Africans are not equal to them. It a lot of discrimination towards women in the story to. Women were looked down at to be worth less than men not as important.

The liberal individualist concept of persons and the feminist concepts of persons are different. However, both concepts represent a form of feminism that aims to promote equality between men and women.

I do feel like this compass accurately describes me because I am a mixture of both authoritarian and libertarian views. I also feel like the reason why I am almost in the center is because I have very few stout opinions on political views so I am neither strong libertarian nor authoritarian. The libertarian side of this compass appeals to me because they want people to have freedom of choice and this is something that I agree on. I do question the powerful leaders of this country like a libertarian would because I do not want to follow blindly and trust them quickly without looking into what their actual morals, beliefs and policies are. With the freedom I feel like people deserve, I also do think that there should be structure and order to

Being a libertarian, I am dead against the concept of reservation. The whole concept of reservation is flawed and short sighted. What people fail to understand is that one can never achieve equality. There always exist an inequality and this inequality can be forgone only by the individual himself. When people invoke the principle of artificial inequality, what many fail to understand is that that the artificiality fades and the individual is restored to the original position. I call it the weighing scale theory.

However, since direct participation was not possible in large societies, Mill thought the `ideal type of a perfect government would be a representative government'.