Life Cycle Cost Of The Building

The main aim of factor 4 is to decrease the level of materials utilization and usage of human resources to one fourth level. The Factor 4 follows a set of guidelines for comparing design options and for evaluating the performance of buildings and their component systems. Factor 4 suggests that for humanity to live sustainably today, we must rapidly reduce resource consumption to one-quarter of its current levels. Fortunately, the technology to accomplish Factor 4 reductions in resource consumption already exists and requires only public policy prioritization and implementation.

I have orchestrated a multi-million dollar capital improvement plan that supports the longevity of the buildings. Along with my personal experiences in operations, I have been able to problem solve many of the potential issues that come with aging construction.

Today’s Designers, Architects and Constructors have a duty of care to strive to produce energy efficient and energy saving buildings. Where possible the sustainability of resources / materials and techniques must be a primary concern in the decision making process.

While applying the found research, I used my mathematical abilities to ensure the data presented regarding costs verses depth of materials were accurately given. I also did a cost analysis based upon the data provided regarding durability and maintenance to compare the options in relation to your yearly

In NSW, the construction should be finished The Building Sustainability Index (BASIX), which is a part of the Development Application plans, if the cost of that building is over than $50,000, for this reason’14058 MHDP Lambert Narrabeen’ project completed that certificate. The purpose of The Building Sustainability Index (BASIX) is to control the reduction of water using and greenhouse gas discharging equitably and effectively in NSW. The Basix Certificate is consisting of three sections by focusing on water, thermal comfort and energy. The total result of The Basix Certificate is pass. This report will explain the detail of the Narrabeen project Basix Certificate into three sections, water, thermal comfort and energy.

Life Cycle Cost (LCC) is the total lifespan cost incurred by an organization in purchasing, installing, operating, maintaining, and disposing off any equipment used in daily operations of the firm. In regard to this, estimation of LCC encompasses using a particular approach in identifying and quantifying components of an LCC equation (Pehnt, 2006). The use of LCC as an assessment tool when selecting possible design alternatives results in the provision of a cost-effective solution within limits of available data. In addition, a standard LCC comprises initial and operation costs, installation and commissioning costs, energy costs as well as disposal costs among others.

Overall there are numerous environmental factors to consider with the construction of the skyscraper from the ‘AllHigh’ company. These factors determine whether or not this proposal is beneficial, whilst also meeting the needs of the society and the environment. Although many disadvantages were present, other alternatives and recommendations are needed to potentially reduce the level of impact and hopefully mitigate some consequences.

Contractors find alternative ways of transforming them into buildings that will make an impact on the public. By using their expertise, they would be able to transform these used containers into something useful and beneficial. These containers would provide them the opportunity to acquire more projects and earn profit and of course achieving a sustainable competitive advantage. Through this, contractors are also able to add value to these containers that have once been unused. Extending the life of these discarded materials and providing affordable infrastructures to the people is a complete viable approach.

In this regard, Hamelin and Zmeureanu (2014) conducted a lifecycle cost analysis (LCCA) in a single-family home in Québec; they presented the optimum thermal resistance value of building envelope that achieved the minimum lifecycle cost. The insulation level of recommended design in their study was much higher than code requirements. This is due to the fact that the lifespan of an actual house is quite long, which provides a substantial energy savings from better insulation and would have offset the additional initial cost in this case.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is becoming an increasingly important methodology for assessing building materials. It is particularly useful for understanding the production-related impacts of materials, as well as the potential trade-offs between life cycle stages. This analysis of a brick bearing wall is both quantitative (tracking a series of economic, environmental, and ethical metrics across all life cycle stages) and qualitative (describing each life cycle stage and its impacts). In order to make this LCA as specific as

For purposes of the asset provider financial discussion relative to investment, there is a cost and benefit analysis that always takes place. These elements are generally described as, for cost elements, facility capital costs (dictated by site location and design, as well as the partners involved in the planning process), facility maintenance costs (ongoing costs of maintaining a facility to ensure safe operations and upkeep), and operating costs (such as labor costs, fuel costs, equipment costs, and the time lost to congestion or to the breakdown of efficient supply chains).

Life cycle costing is a technique that is used to assess environmental impacts that are linked with the product life stages from manufacturing to consumption that is from raw material acquisition to processing or manufacture, distribution, consumption, maintenance and repair (Epstein & Buhovac, 2014). It shows and some of the environmental concerns associated with the product life (Koroluk, 2012).

Whole Life Appraisal (WLA) method also known as Life Cycle Costing is the process of identification and documentation of all the costs that involved over the life span of assets. Managers, investors and owners from time to time require to make decisions concerning the investment, acquisition and ongoing usage of diverse assets such as plant and equipment, design, construction and repair costs of construction projects and maintenance of these facilities with the assets that are housed there-in. Whole Life Appraisal offers an opportunity for decisions makers to be able to evaluate the future costs involved in the projects they engage in so that they can make the best decisions. This is important because the future costs involved in usage and acquisition are usually greater than the initial costs of deploying these projects or acquiring assets. This essay will elaborate on the limitations of whole life appraisal (WLA) in making investment decisions for components, elements and whole projects.

We are requested to assist the building with creating a method of construction cost data for client throughout the pre contract. The task of data collection is a difficult procedure and can be include to wide variations. Based upon our experience as quantity surveyors we chose to develop a cost data collection method. Our define construction line items and quantities for relativity building types.

Estimation of emissions at construction phase is one of the most complicated tasks when performing an emission study on a building (Guggemos and Horvath, 2005, Junnila et al., 2006a). This is due to the uniqueness of construction activities and associated methods from project to project. Unavailability of quality data and inventories and time consuming nature of data collection are some of the other reasons that emissions at construction phase is given less consideration.