preview

Maalick Religion

Good Essays

Maalick, a minority with a unique religion, endured inappropriate workplace behaviors over time culminating in a hostile work environment. Although federal law and corporate governance prohibited workplace discrimination and harassment, it is clear that the Treton office in Chenworth, Kansas had a prolonged atmosphere of ridicule, mistreatment, racial harassment, and religious discrimination. Contrary to the protections afforded in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, office personnel defied corporate policy and federal law by openly displaying unacceptable workplace behaviors (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2016). In this regard, workers perpetuated religious mocking and ridicule with head nodding and laughter towards Maalick’s new …show more content…

As the facility director, Jenkin’s was complicit in supervisor duties by neglecting to conform to corporate governance and federal law. When initially approached by Maalick for time off, Jenkins questioned the authenticity of the religion since Maalick’s new religion was dissimilar from Jenkins’ religion. Neither appropriate nor inappropriate, this incident indicated a degree of exclusiveness to Maalick’s religion. Moreover, the day after the name change, Maalick asked Jenkins to address the offensive office conduct and Jenkins laughed and dismissed the office behaviors. With the ability to act on behalf of Treton as the facility director, Jenkins could have easily observed and stopped the office workers from mocking Maalick’s religion and behaving in hostile ways (Dean et al., 2014). Although given an opportunity to redress the situation, Jenkins failed to uphold corporate governance and failed to take appropriate actions to correct the office environment. Additionally, Jenkins tolerated and overlooked the unacceptable behaviors. In condoning the offensive conduct, Jenkins allowed the creation of a hostile work environment. Lastly, although Maalick’s last performance evaluation indicated superior performance, Jenkins’ final act to hire an outsider to fulfill the systems manager position, instead of Maalick, indicated a perception of …show more content…

workforce must learn to work together regardless of religious differences (Flake, 2015). Accordingly, employers and workers must adapt to the changing religious landscape and increase accommodations and tolerance of unique beliefs and practices. From a corporate perspective, Dixon can conduct a confidential diversity study to determine awareness of biases (Gomez-Mejia et al., 2016). With this data, Dixon can then develop and guide diversity awareness training across the entire company to foster an atmosphere of religious inclusion and initiate support groups to counteract feelings of

Get Access