Maalick, a minority with a unique religion, endured inappropriate workplace behaviors over time culminating in a hostile work environment. Although federal law and corporate governance prohibited workplace discrimination and harassment, it is clear that the Treton office in Chenworth, Kansas had a prolonged atmosphere of ridicule, mistreatment, racial harassment, and religious discrimination. Contrary to the protections afforded in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, office personnel defied corporate policy and federal law by openly displaying unacceptable workplace behaviors (Gomez-Mejia, Balkin, & Cardy, 2016). In this regard, workers perpetuated religious mocking and ridicule with head nodding and laughter towards Maalick’s new …show more content…
As the facility director, Jenkin’s was complicit in supervisor duties by neglecting to conform to corporate governance and federal law. When initially approached by Maalick for time off, Jenkins questioned the authenticity of the religion since Maalick’s new religion was dissimilar from Jenkins’ religion. Neither appropriate nor inappropriate, this incident indicated a degree of exclusiveness to Maalick’s religion. Moreover, the day after the name change, Maalick asked Jenkins to address the offensive office conduct and Jenkins laughed and dismissed the office behaviors. With the ability to act on behalf of Treton as the facility director, Jenkins could have easily observed and stopped the office workers from mocking Maalick’s religion and behaving in hostile ways (Dean et al., 2014). Although given an opportunity to redress the situation, Jenkins failed to uphold corporate governance and failed to take appropriate actions to correct the office environment. Additionally, Jenkins tolerated and overlooked the unacceptable behaviors. In condoning the offensive conduct, Jenkins allowed the creation of a hostile work environment. Lastly, although Maalick’s last performance evaluation indicated superior performance, Jenkins’ final act to hire an outsider to fulfill the systems manager position, instead of Maalick, indicated a perception of …show more content…
workforce must learn to work together regardless of religious differences (Flake, 2015). Accordingly, employers and workers must adapt to the changing religious landscape and increase accommodations and tolerance of unique beliefs and practices. From a corporate perspective, Dixon can conduct a confidential diversity study to determine awareness of biases (Gomez-Mejia et al., 2016). With this data, Dixon can then develop and guide diversity awareness training across the entire company to foster an atmosphere of religious inclusion and initiate support groups to counteract feelings of
In “Working it Out” by Diana Eck, she writes about religious oppression in the workplace. The examples she gives on the many ways people have been fired, or the ways in which people's faiths have been compromised, reiterates that the amendment that states freedom of religion in the United States, is
In this particular case, Mr. Maalick received very clear and convincing racial and religious discrimination from both his supervisor and from his co-workers. The employees of Treton blatantly violated the Civil Rights Act and the Equal. Employment. Opportunity Commission. These acts do not allow, under any circumstances, discrimination based on the idea of race, color, sex, religion or age (The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | National Archives, n.d.).
The circumstances, images and fallout related to September 11, 2001 have caused many Americans to revisit their spiritual beliefs in attempt to process the horrific events of such an unimaginable day (Smith, 2003). In the years since the Fall of 2001, employees have developed an increasing desire to integrate their personal spirituality and religious beliefs with their professional lives (Cunningham, 2010). Managers are now faced with the difficult task of accommodating the varying spiritual beliefs of their workforce while tactfully mitigating religion-based issues in accordance with Title VII.
Maalick encountered religious discrimination on several occasions while at work. The first instance was when he requested vacation for a religious event and his manager was reluctant to grant the request because of his religious beliefs. According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employers are required to “reasonably accommodate the
Religious difference has been a question not just for theological schools and religious institutions but, increasingly for some businesses and corporations, offices and factories. In the past ten years the equal employment opportunity commission, which considers workplace complaints that may violate the civil rights act, has reported a 31 percent rise in complaints of religious discrimination in the workplace.
“This is not about his religious views but about his ability to lead a diverse work force. It’s unfortunate that this had to happen. I feel the mayor has done the right thing to ensure all employees are treated fairly.”
In another case, a restaurant called Sorrano’s Mexican Restaurant was sued in 2002 by Terra Neave(manager)for not accommodating to religious belief. She led a bible study after work and two of her subordinates attended. According to company policy manager are not suppose to socialize with subordinates,to prevent sexual harassment. The company offered to transfer her to another location, she refused and continued to lead bible study with her subordinates. With this type of substantial evidence she lost the case. In these two cases our rights were upheld and justice was served according to our civil rights laws(Luci Scott, Jan 2009).
I feel employment discrimination concerns can be addressed quite simply in the religious workplace by implementing an organizational policy addressing ministerial exceptions and first amendment rights in relation to respecting an establishment of religion with state. Through ongoing training with staff covering religious rights in the workplace I would give detail and clear guidance on how to notify individuals and supervisor to make a discrimination complaint without retaliation.
Besides, she should have taken actions against Jenkin, when he did a disparate treatment by not picking Maalick for that position he was clearly fit for. Ghumman, Ryan, Barclay, & Markel,(2013) clarified in an article, “disparate treatment in employment refers to difference in treatment with respect to recruitment, hiring, promotion, or privileges of employment due to an individual’s religion” (p.450). HR personnel ought to evaluate Treton’s policies and procedures periodically and conduct employee’s trainings to reinforce those protocols. As Treton have their company’s violation policy, HR staff should take each and every complaint seriously and ensure to implement it whenever such unbearable incidents occur in
When a person thinks of a job they think of the money they earn, but do not look further into the vulnerability of being discriminated because of religion. Everyone is entitled to basic human rights, among those include religious freedom as seen in the First Amendment in our nation's Constitution. The workplace should be a safe environment where people are able to go and earn a living for themselves and not have to fear discrimination due to their faith. There’s no doubt that religious discrimination in the workplace is a contentious issue, but Supreme Court rulings and organizations like the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), are addressing these situations.
For this diversity topic, learning about other religions should make us aware of the various world religions that exist. For us, these presentation summaries give way to how each person interviewed is affected either by other in their workplace or by society. We have five total presentations we can further our understanding for different religions that we may have never thought of in the aspect of diversity and discrimination.
Having worked in various businesses and organizations throughout the years, religion has been a subject rarely discussed or even mentioned in the workplace. Moreover, I always regarded one’s religious background and beliefs as a personal matter of choice.
According to the, Religion and the US workplace, President Benjamin Franklin express the conflict and tension arises when the balance between of one’s employment and one’s faith, “work as though they would live a hundred years and pray as though they would die tomorrow.” However, during Franklin era, the average American during time work with someone with the same religion. Today’s Americans workplace environment is more diverse and with different religions and beliefs. In paper would illustrate religion discrimination in the workplace, religion freedom, and, religion and workplace accommodation. In addition, answer the questions to assignment #1.
American society is slowly, but surely, moving towards equality in the workplace. In the past decade laws have been passed that prohibit discrimination in hiring, retaining and promoting employees based on race, gender, disability and religious beliefs. Although not all groups have been included yet, the movement towards a more just workplace is evident. Nowadays, almost every single employer will have the sign "Equal Opportunity Employer" under the name of the company, especially when recruiting. However, even though companies have adopted these standards as a part of their corporate culture, not all people are able to fully appreciate and accept diversity in the workplace. Although there are many
Can you imagine being employed and prohibited from practicing your beliefs at work? Religion has come to be an important matter in the workplace. This is because of the ongoing religious diversity within the working environment. In today’s world, businesses employee individuals from different countries and religious backgrounds who may practice their beliefs in a variety of ways. There are ethical issues associated with religion in the workplace such as religious harassment, attire, and practices. We have the right to practice our religious beliefs without the interference of these issues which can result from others not understanding our views. Although there are some ethical issues which can arise, religious practices in the workplace should continue to be allowed because of the growing diversity within today’s world and business establishments.