Misrepresentations of Statistics Revised n Flu Vaccine May Lower Heart Attack Risk, Research Finds

Hi my name is Marah and today I am going to persuade you to get a Flu vaccination. I recently got a job working at Walgreens Pharmacy. Every day that I work I see people coming in to pick up their prescriptions that don’t look like the feel very great, with a tissue in one hand and their money in the other. No one wants to be sick, it’s not fun and it makes you feel like crap and you get absolutely nothing done. So it would only make sense if everyone was taking the precautionary measure in getting a flu shot. People should be lining up to get their vaccinations in order to prevent them from them getting sick and missing school, work or important events; but they aren’t, at Walgreens, we give maybe about 4 flu shots a day,

To get the flu vaccine or not to get the flu vaccine? This is a huge controversial question millions of Americans today ask themselves every year. There are many myths that come along with the topic of the flu vaccine that lead to people questioning the effectiveness of the medication. Safety for our families and loved ones is what we aim to achieve, but what are the pros and cons of this vaccine? What are the consequences and what are myths, but most importantly: what are the reasons we should get it in the first place? In this paper you will learn the many reasons for the flu vaccination and how it affects different populations beginning with children all the way to the elderly population. First of all, what is the flu

The most dangerous diseases of our nation have been streaked out by widespread protection or immunity. This widespread protection has been the effect of an immense vaccination which is also called an immunization that introduces vaccines into the body. In this textbook, it mentions that a vaccine is “a preparation of killed, inactivated, or attenuated microorganisms or toxoids to induce artificially acquired active immunity.” (Tortora 487). Like anything else, there are many individuals who disagree with the common immunity or vaccination in general. These people base themselves off weak and false studies, which they then take and go further to spread their bias misled beliefs. These individuals do all of this without looking at the history,

The biggest problem with flu vaccines is the World Health Organization. Though countless studies show that vaccines created by them were connected to things such as cancer, autism, and death, they still stand by their views that vaccines are not hazardous. The World Health Organization recently had their MMR vaccine that treated Measles, Mumps, and Rubella connected to autism. They stated on their website “Based on the extensive review presented, GACVS concluded that no evidence exists of a causal association between MMR vaccine and autism or autistic disorders. The Committee believes the matter is likely to be clarified by a better understanding of the causes of autism”. On the contrary to the World Health Organization’s findings, there are families that were really

Although there was no mention of whether or not the information provided is published in a

Every fall season we hear the question; did you get your flu shot yet? It is supposed to protect you from that nasty flu virus that circulates our communities during the fall and winter months. But, did you know that in 2011 the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Adverse Event Reporting Systems Website (AERS) reported 51 deaths caused by the flu vaccine in the United States (U.S.) (CDC,2012). According to National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), as of July 2012 there have been more than 84,000 reports of adverse reactions, 1000 vaccine related deaths and over 1600 cases of Guillain- Barre syndrome, a acute form of paralysis, triggered by the vaccine (NVIC.ORG).

Author Lee Ventola used statistical data to provide evidence to prove his opinion about childhood vaccinations in almost every paragraph of his academic journal. One example being, “It has been estimated

I first heard about this recent JAMA study on the radio, I thought this is another case where conventional wisdom may be wrong. In my observation, many times with research we find that actions once thought to be appropriate are shown to be harmful. I am interested specifically in the appropriateness of flu shots for several reasons. I have a longstanding interest in public health and vaccination programs of all sorts. In addition part of my work as a Data Analyst requires me to look at data and technical papers in a critical fashion to look for the structure of the study and patterns and/or anomalies that may not be noticeable upon first glance. On a personal level my granddaughter; my wife and myself are approaching the age where we will be in the group recommended for flu shots. As our population grows and the median age gets older, questions regarding where and how we spend our health care dollars will become increasingly important.

Some of the charts that were given in the journal were not necessary. For example, Figure two which explains the flow of hospital units and patients. The information provided in this chart was explained enough in the text. Providing this chart was a waste of space. The authors could have written more

First, the article is current and the author is credible. The article was made in 2014. Espejo is a credible writer because he has wrote many pro/con argument papers, and he is a young adult and children's writer. Next, the article has well-documented facts and sources. Some sources are wall street journal, and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Along with that the article is not biased. Third the essay has pathos, logos and ethos. “”With the arrival of vaccines, numerous infectious diseases that struck hundreds of thousands of people in the United States each year—oftentimes lethally—have been eradicated and nearly forgotten today”(NIDIA)” (Espejo). That is a positive pathos, and also a credible source which is ethos. “In a 2005 study on the economic impact of routine childhood immunization in the United States, researchers estimated that for every dollar spent, the vaccination program saved more than $5 in direct costs and approximately $11 in additional costs to society” (Espejo). That is one of the statistics in this article that is logos. Lastly, the article's intended audience is anyone who wants to know more about vaccines. Overall this article is

It has been proven through the measures of the Randomized Control Trial study and the Observational study that vaccinations serve as an effective way of preventing viruses. For example, when a RCT is performed, volunteers can be placed in two groups. One group receives the actual vaccine, and the other receives a placebo. Within this study, vaccine efficacy is also measured by comparing the frequency of the illness in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. When the Observational study is performed, it’s important to remember that it’s totally upon the individual to whether or not they prefer to be

Adams lacks concrete data in supporting his facts and statements within his article, he doesn’t cite any professional studies to give concession to his stance, and he is basically basing all his information on assumptions. Adams provides no pros in his writing in regard to the vaccine, just negatives and what other major problems the ruling would bring about in the future. The reader would be lead to believe his article was an argumentative one.

More than ever vaccines are met with a high suspicions and very little education on the realities of vaccination success.

The sample population was large and randomly selected which are excellent things when conducting research, however it would be useful to know where this sample came from, one doctor’s office, all over the states, etc. Age, gender etc., would all be other variables that could influence the sample population. Limitations also include how the subjects received their vaccine. Which is unknown at this point. How we know they got the flu, I’m assuming self reported, what did some

He states, “…you are able to find a credible source and then extract the necessary information from that source for your purposes” (p 48). So while it appears that CNBC has some credibility, it does not contain the most practical information. Instead, the article goes into depth on Novavax, a respiratory vaccine, and how its failure led to a drop in their shares. The takeaway from this article was on how a vaccine is expected to reach approval by 2019 for older adults with respiratory