My Philosophy of Education Essay

I agree with Eddy Zhong’s contention, that there is more than one type of intelligence, and that school only helps to build academic intelligence. As kids grow up and enter higher levels of education, they start to lose their creative intelligence. The speaker uses an example of himself. Throughout his school career, he was always a C student, and fell in between the cracks of the academic system. However, when he was invited to a business plan competition, his mindset completely changed. Eddy and his team had won the competition. They had impressed the panel of judges by using their creativity. When most teams created Power Points on their idea, Eddy and his team had went out and purchased materials to create a physical prototype. This was

Education entails individual human development in the cognitive, emotional, creative and social areas. All children are entitled to a free education regardless of race, cultural background or handicaps. For education to be an effective part of the students life, the student and teacher must be actively and enthusiastically involved in learning. A teacher needs to be well prepared and organized. They need to know the perspective goals for each student and ways to achieve these goals. Teachers need to work with students to help them grow and develop ways to use their knowledge.

Although we might all get the equal education there is still times in which education might seem unfair or not high quality. Since we do have the possibility to go to school all we need is for the teachers to give us their time and effort for us to become great people in the future. In Kirp’s article “The Secret to Fixing Bad Schools” it says we should be giving the students' “teachable moments”. This is a great option of helping the children out. They will be able to learn and make connections to their education materials if they are taught the right ways. It also says a way for students to succeed “students must become thinkers, not just test-takers” I feel like this is a very powerful saying. Kirp have a good point students should become

Albert Einstein once said "everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole existence thinking it is stupid". There are many students who relate to that fish believing they are unintelligent and useless. Believing that they cannot possibly succeed in the education system. The education system is failing to teach students and bring out their maximum potential. Everyday thousands of students drop out of school because they are failing to succeed. Gerald Graff argues in his article “Hidden Intellectualism” that the educational institution are failing to nurture students. Therefore, Graff believes that some students would be more willing to learn and have better success if they were taught things that interest them rather than subjects that interest the teachers. I agree with Graff because he writes about the misconception of intellectualism and how individuals think that solely the "geeks or the nerds" can have academic success. Individuals are completely forgetting that some students hidden intellectualism is found not in book smarts, but rather street smarts, suggesting that teachers should tap into students hidden intellectualism so that it can no longer be hidden.

Psychologist Carol Dweck found that students perform better if they believe that they are intelligent “you can always greatly change how intelligent you are” than if they think “you have a certain amount of intelligence, and you really can’t do much to change it.” She also believes that when a student has a positive attitude, it makes them push themselves harder when others would desist. She believes that there is no limit on their learning potential and challenge is viewed as a way to improve themselves. ” They know that their intelligence can be built through experience and effort, and are not held back by the idea of inborn restrictions.”1

The questions of learning and intelligence have long been debated since education has ever existed. That learning leads directly to intelligence is an assumption which has not been subject to adequate scrutiny. Typically, a fixed mindset believes that an "intelligent" student is one who invests less of almost about everything to not only succeed but also to achieve outstanding results. That is, by studying less an intelligent student is expected to know about study subjects enough, which requires the least effort possible of him or her. Talent, moreover, has long been praised as an exceptional gift which one is helpless to develop, let alone initiate. The ideas about learning, intelligence and talent are challenged by prominent psychologists and education scholars Angela Lee Duckworth, Assistant Professor of Psychology at University of Pennsylvania and Carol S. Dweck, Lewis and Virginia Eaton Professor of Psychology at Stanford University.

Throughout the course, we discussed two mindsets that students portray in how they approach learning. The first is a growth mindset where a child recognizes that intelligence can be continuously developed as long as you're willing to embrace challenges, learn from criticism, and see effort as a part of mastering a task. In contrast, some students exhibit a fixed mindset where a child believes that there is a threshold for intelligence. This is evidenced by a tendency for that

A difference, is one of a big side of not being the same way as someone or something. Intelligence is not known as for how students are viewed or seem to be smart. One of a big problem here in school is how teachers only see that the smart kid is not struggling and the non smart kid is actually struggling and when the teacher asks the class if they are doing fine if they need help only half of the kids that some what get what they are doing say yes and the kids that have no idea of what they're doing on there first try they do the job and don't understand it give up and so they are scared for them to say that no they do not get what they are doing, and so the teacher thinks it's fine for him to move on and not have the time to go and check for the the other half that did not raised there voice for help. One of a big change that can happen but most of the teachers chose not to make it happen is to spend more time checking their students if they are understanding what they are doing and help them develop their minds because with hardwork and effort on the students and the help of the professor at the end

Some children advance more quickly in the development of logical intelligence than do others, this is known as Piagetian Principals in the Classroom. The students should

In working with different peoples' styles and kinds of intelligence, I must sometimes stop and see how can I work best with them. By having a balanced curriculum, lesson plan, and activities in the classroom we can meet the needs of the students but also motivate them to learn. Of course it is not realistic to think that educators can have a plan for every single intelligence type in their classroom, but by focusing on the strengths of each student teachers can have an avenue of learning every student.

Scientist have research that about 90% of the people don't achieve their goals because of the challenges encountered. Many of our students here in the city of Anaheim are faced with challenges everyday and sometimes don’t know how to deal with them. My argument is that student success is founded upon giving full effort from students rather than by achieving good grades. In the research story of the secret to raising smart kids by Carol Dweck is a research based paper on the achievements of students.”The mastery oriented children, on the other hand, think intelligence is malleable and can be developed through education and hard work. They want to learn above all else. After all if you believe it that you can expand your intellectual skills, you want to do just that, because slipups stem from a lack of effort, not ability, they can be remedied by more effort”(27).The student intellectual intelligence can grow by studying. They believe that intelligence is malleable. It can be changed or shaped by the hard work and what things we change. If school in Anaheim cared about their education we would be talking about different topics. Since we would be putting so much effort to our changes of habit to better understanding in school we would be satisfied with our results. Many of us would try again and again if it is possible to get a better result. Putting effort can take time but at the end it is worth it. Many of our students believe a challenge changes their intelligence view.

Everyday teachers make decisions that influences student’s opportunities to enhance their learning through different content areas. Thus, it is essential as a teacher to draw upon the content knowledge you want your students to take away from your class but it is also equally important to equip your students with skills that will help them outside of the academic realm as well.

Intelligence is the mental capacity to learn and use knowledge in different situations, which in this case is learning the in the classroom, and can affect how well a student performs in a certain class. Intelligence also has a biological foundation, which means that the potential for a child to reach full mental capacity is determined by his or her genetics. However, intelligence is not completely biologically deterministic because the nurturing of the child can also affect how intelligent he or she can become, which can also take part in the classroom. Students have their strengths and weaknesses in certain subject areas and it is believed that if merit pay is implemented, and this is taken into consideration when learning the classroom, then their performance will increase. The idea of strengths and weaknesses in certain subject areas is supported by previous research done by Howard Gardner on multiple intelligences. He has defined eight distinct intelligences that can determine these strengths and weaknesses in the classroom. These intelligences include: linguistic, being word smart, naturalist, being nature smart, musical, being sound smart, visual-spatial, being picture smart, bodily-kinesthetic, being body smart, interpersonal, being people smart, intrapersonal, being self smart, and logical-mathematical, being pattern smart (Myers & Dewall, 2015). In the classroom, the intelligences that would be focused on a lot are logical-mathematical, linguistic, musical, and

When students hear the word “education”, they associate it with the word school and a picture of an angry teacher commanding them to do things. It is rare for students to announce that education is important or valuable. When a person is given the opportunity to observe a school environment in depth, they would witness how students lack motivation to go to school since they think of it as a prison. They would witness how students are cramming and rushing to do their homework at lunch because they did not bother to do it at home. They would witness how, sometimes, teachers leave students on their own to avoid work. Education has been taken advantage of and dismissed. The mere talk of knowledge and school makes young people cringe and feel

I have also learnt through experience that learning cannot happen in a ‘one size fits all’ approach. Each child has a combination of different intelligence and learning style (Howard Gardner). Some children would portray a balanced perspicacity, while others show certain dominating traits of intelligence. It is not up to the child to identify these traits and harness it. In fact the onus is on the teacher to identify and draw out the true potential of the learner, in a way the learner feels motivated and challenged.