North And South Essay

The first thing that Jackson went after being the bank, or economy. Many people liked the bank as it provided loans to businesses, and money management; people who liked the bank were Republicans, rich people, and businessmen. Just as how people like it, people also dislike the bank: Democrats, southerners, poor people, and westerners; their reasons were that the bank was unconstitutional, and it could restrict loans. Jackson was a democrat, so he was not a fan of the bank, therefore he did not like Nicholas Biddle who was the president of the bank. Eventually Nicholas Biddle decided to renew the banks’ charter early and Jackson decided to veto the bill as he did not like the bank and what it could do. People felt great about this and felt pride that Jackson would stop something unconstitutional and he won the next election with major support. The only problem with states’ rights was that Jackson did not like that John C. Calhoun is trying to tell states they could nullify any federal law they choose. Democrats, southerners and John C. Colhoun were for nullification as Calhoun did not like Jackson and wanted him to fail, and the southerners did not think it applied to them. Jackson, Republicans, and northerners were against nullification as Jackson agreed with it and then northerners found it applied to them. Since Jackson

The period between 1816 and 1824 is commonly and wrongly labeled the “Era of Good Feelings” because of the single party politics that took place in the United States. The Democratic Republicans, led by James Monroe, were the only political party at the time. There was far less voter tension because there was only one party running. However, Martin Van Buren (Document C) was against the single party politics and argued that having two parties competing against each other would be beneficial and desirable. He writes to Thomas Ritchie that the “revival of old party distinctions” would be “highly salutary” and beneficial to the country. Van Buren believed that it would unite the Southern planters with the Republicans of the North. In 1824 however, John Quincy Adams, and Henry Clay teamed up to defeat the man who had garnered the most votes by any individual. The plan worked and the two won the presidency. It was dubbed as the “Corrupt Bargain” because the two had “stolen” the presidency from Jackson.

Jackson firmly believed in quality of economic opportunity, which he showed several times throughout his presidency. He believed the national bank helped the wealthy elite and that state banks would help the common man more. Also by

Jackson was a supporter of the working class; he was viewed as a true liberal democratic. The Second Bank appeared to be monopolistic and aristocratic. This did not coincide with Jackson’s views on politics, economics, and society. Jackson did not

Jackson resented banks because he was a man who came from a family of poor farmers who paid with goods and crops. He saw banks as only useful to the wealthy, so when Henry Clay proposed “The Bank Bill”, which was in favor of the recharter, Jackson vetoed it. Andrew Jackson only thought about himself, and people who were like him, poor farmers. In total, vetoed twelve bills during his presidency, which was more than all of the preceding presidents combined. Again, Jackson set his mind to do something, and it was done.

The First Party System refers to a period between 1792 and the 1820’s when the American political system was divided into two parties. Both parties, the Federalist Party, and the Democratic-Republican Party, wanted control of the Congress, the presidency, and the states. The parties were the result of the differences between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson on how to solve various national problems such as the economic crisis that was threatening the nation at the time (Dickerson, 2004). However, the roots of these political parties and concerns emerged during the constitution ratification process. On one hand, the Federalists supported the constitution while, on the other hand, the Antifederalists (Democratic-Republican) did not support it due to key issues that had not been considered in the new constitution (rAndon HersHey & Beck, 2015).

While there are many notable differences between Jefferson and Jackson, there is one major similarity: their opinions relating to economics. They both firmly opposed a United States Bank that stood in opposition of state banks. Jackson was in favor of state banks and had won a bank war that enabled him to draw out money from the federal standpoint and place these funds into state banks. Jefferson had the same view, as he encouraged state banks. In other words, both Jackson and Jefferson opposed a national bank, and encouraged state banks.

The creation of the Democratic Party and the abolishment of the national bank are a few of the several decisions Andrew Jackson made that benefited the U.S. Using the time between elections, Jackson’s supporters created the Democratic Party which would represent common people, such as ordinary farmers, workers, and the poor (Hart et al 259). The creation of this new political organization gave common people the right to

“In spite of the founders’ fears, two major-political factions – the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were formed even before the Constitution was ratified.” Sidlow, 2015, P 143) Federalists wanted stronger national government and Anti-Federalist (Jefferson Republicans) wanted states’ rights and feared government could become too powerful. In the election of 1796 was the first time candidates from different political party systems held strongly opposed party principles and this time period defined political life as we know it. For the next twenty years the Jefferson Republicans dominated American Politics. In the 1820’s the Jefferson Republicans split into two groups, supporters of Andrews Jackson called their party the Democrats, and the other group called themselves the National Republican Party (Whig Party). During the 1840’s and 1850’s Democrats and Whigs competed for the White House and the two party system fully emerged

Jacksonian Democrats help create a more democratic America and because of this, believed themselves to be many things, real and fictional. In most cases they perceived themselves as defenders of equal economic opportunity, even though they sometimes put their own interests before those of the people. They also thought of themselves as guardians of political democracy, while at the same time using class differences to their advantage and emotionalized speeches, lacking real intellectual merit, to stir support. Jacksonian Democrats felt that they were the protectors of the Constitution and of individual liberties but many times they put their rivalry with the Northeastern industry and Whig politics before these things. While Jacksonians

Another main issue concerning the parties and their different views was centered on domestic economic policies; the creation and sustainment of the National Bank. Federalists were in favor of the National Bank because they believed the nation would thrive off of business, commerce and industry. Although the Constitution did not state within itself the creation of a national banking system, Federalists often loosely interpreted the Constitution. Democratic-Republicans, on the other hand, were strongly opposed to the creation of the National Bank, fearing that it placed too much control in the hands of the federal government. Democratic-Republicans had a strict interpretation of the Constitution, meaning that if the Constitution did not explicitly authorize something to the federal government, then it was reserved to the states. Because of Federalist’s ideals that the nation would prosper off of industry, they gained much support from bankers, merchants, manufacturers, and the elite. Their support system was based in the North, due to the North’s growing industrial economy because of their bitter climate, ports, and abundance of natural resources. However, the Democratic-Republicans gained much of the South’s vote because of their support in farmers and planters. Their belief in state’s rights, individualism, neutrality and preference of an agricultural society as opposed to an industrial society won them support in the south. With their

With Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin in 1793, cotton became very profitable. This machine was able to reduce the time it took to separate seeds from the cotton. However, at the same time the increase in the number of plantations willing to move from other crops to cotton meant the greater need for a large amount of cheap labor, i.e. slaves. Thus, the southern economy became a one crop economy, depending on cotton and therefore on slavery. On the other hand, the northern economy was based more on industry than agriculture. In fact, the northern industries were purchasing the raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. This disparity between the two set up a

The Renaissance through Italian influences as well as the North played a huge role in shaping not only the countries involved, but it changed the world in numerous ways. Through the arts and the intellectuals that brought about great ideas, this era could easily be defined as a time of rebirth for beauty and knowledge. The Northern and Italian Renaissance revitalized and developed Europe from the Middle Ages, both areas were similar in their ideas, but different from their timing.

Elizabeth Gaskell's novel North and South, as described by Rosemarie Bodenheimer, is “a novel about irrevocable change, and about the confused process of response and accommodation that attends it” (282). One can certainly argue that the character of Mr. Thornton must be among the most intriguing ones that go through such change. Over the course of the novel, he grows from a proud, impatient businessman to become, well, just as proud, but somehow more of a patient man. His humanity seems to be revealed through his association with and admiration for Miss Margaret Hale. When the two of them first meet, he is a capitalist who harbours love for classic authors. After a while, the reader gets to know another side to his ruthless working politics