Observation Of The Judge Petrolle: Court Case

In the State of Wisconsin with the trial of Jamie Covington we found him guilty of first degree murder. Jamie ment to shoot Dallas because dallas was always above him and better. Dallas forgot his keys one evening and he went through the window because he forgot his keys, he claims that he had gone through the window before and he didn't think anything would happen. This is why everyone is being questions to see if he was guilty or no, which he is guilty. During this case the lawyers questioned many people, but their stories weren't adding up. They talked to Ronnie Cecop, Casey Kramer, and Lane Smith they were on the defence side. Then Morgan Dexter, Blair Allen, and Jamie Covington where the prosecution. Most of the people on the prosecution side were very nervous, didn't know some answers, but on the other side the people on the defence side knew every question and didn't seem nervous. All of these people had their strengths and weaknesses.

Does your team feel this defendant is competent to stand trial? Why or why not?

From these observations, it was clear that the nature of a trial is very cooperative. However, that being said, what we were witnessing was just the closing statement of one party. Perhaps during other parts of the trial when the lawyers were making their arguments and examining witnesses, things were more adversarial. It would be interesting now to watch a trial at another stage for comparison.

On July 18th 2017 at about 3:30pm my classmates and I went to a felony trial at the Manhattan Supreme court. I attended the trial to listen and take notes for a class assignment. The presiding judge’s name was Justice Gregory Carro,

Explain the difference between a cash basis and accrual basis measure of performance. Why, in most cases, does accrual basis net income provide a better measure of performance than net operating cash flow? Explain the purpose of adjusting entries as they relate to the difference between cash and accrual accounting.

One of the things that stood out to me in the first trial was the fact that the defendant had already spent 26 days in jail. I also found it interesting that a second prosecutor walked in, bowed, and continued to sit down in the middle of the trial. The judge continued her questioning of

I attended the District Court at 201 West Picacho Ave on March 7, 2011. I sat in on judge Mike Murphy's court. Judge Murphy started court promptly at 9:00 a.m. but before I got into the court I had to wait in a long line of about 30 people. then when I finally got to the court house door I had to go through a metal detector where I had to take off my belt and shoes and everything metal on my persons. Then I asked one of the officers working the metal dictator how I could ask to sit in on a criminal court that was going on this morning. She then directed me to court room four. I asked the bailiff if it was ok for me to sit in on court today for my criminal justice class, and if the case where criminal matters. The bailiff then told me that

On Monday February 8, 2016, I was assigned to Judge El Amin’s courtroom (courtroom 5). At approximately 0945 hours, my assistance was no longer needed in courtroom 5. Therefore, at approximately 1000 hours, I entered Judge Crawford’s courtroom (courtroom 6) in order to assist with the transporting of juveniles to and from the holding cells, etc.

On Friday, April, 4, 2014, I observed the Vanderburgh County Superior Court to observe different family law cases. The cases I heard involved contempt of court for failing to pay child support, failure to appear for a court appointed drug test, birth certificate affidavit, request for contest hearing time, and an issue of paternity case. Magistrate Judge Sheila M. Corcoran was presiding over the family court hearings. When entering the courthouse, I was greeted by security and advised to remove any cell phones, and/or, any other items that would trigger a metal detector. After this, I proceeded straight to look for the family courtroom. After roaming around mindlessly for a couple minutes, I decided to ask the courthouse officer monitoring

I went to the court on October 13, around 10:30. When I first walked in there were a lot of people there I wasn’t expecting that at all. Security was higher than at the magistrate court. There were attorneys there but they stand next to there defendants at all times since it was still assembly justice so the trials didn’t go on for days if the most for about 30 minutes. The first case I had a chance was already on its way so I don’t know how long it had been going on for. The defendant was wearing a dark blue jump suit. As well as he had some chains aournd his waist

Throughout my experience as an intern at the Immigration Court Watch Program I was able to observe four different courtrooms each with a different judge. Unfortunately, during the time that I was observing inside of the courtroom I was only able to see two cases where the judge came to a conclusion. I assessed the credibility of the judge’s decision based on the dangerous decisions theory and the evidence for both cases. The first case was about a man who was hoping to apply for residency in the United States, but he had a criminal record. However, he was still able to apply for it without guarantee of him receiving residency. He asked the judge if he could stay in the United States during the process because when filing that specific application

Courtrooms and lawyers played a significant and meaningful part of my life. I come from a family in which many have encountered the criminal justice system. It is one of the many reasons why I have a desire to attend law school and become a defense attorney. Although, my desire to practice law came from a difficult experience, an experience that resulted in my father doing time in a Federal Facility, I knew that law would always be a part of my life. My dad spent more than a year battling charges and going to trial for his case. Lawyers, courtrooms, judges, trials and verdicts not only became a part of my dad’s life but mine as well. His actions led him to prison; however, through his actions I found my passion for law. Although an extremely difficult time I came in contact with lawyers and judges who inspired me with their hard work and dedication. Their determination to fight for my dad and his freedom made me

As the hearing commenced, my attorney brought to the courts attention that he was feeling ill. The hearing continued and finally after four hours my time had come to present the evidence and prove my innocence. I took the stand, staring at my attorney waiting for chance to speak, but he abruptly interrupted all progress and informed the judge that he felt too sick to proceed. Against the courts demands to finish the hearing, he stormed out of the court room. There I sat, I could feel the currents strongly pulling me far out to sea. Desperate to rescue myself, I requested to continue but unfortunately the court declined and signed the order. Immediately following, I found myself abandoned by justice, rendered helpless and experiencing the most unbearable loss ever, my child. She was ordered to live with her father for six months, which meant I had to do the unimaginable, let her go.

I immediately noticed that the defendant didn’t have a lawyer, and it shocked me because I don’t usually hear of people successfully defending themselves in court. Before presenting his evidence, he asked the judge a question on how he was supposed to present it, and Judge Green responded by telling him that he had the opportunity to have a lawyer appointed for

The first court I decided to visit was at 393 University Av. on September 11th after my classes and got there on time for a court session at 12:00 pm. The security was very strict. They looked through my backpack and made me take everything out of my pockets. After the security check we started looking for courtrooms with trials going on and I discovered that not much was happening at that time. A very nice woman told me that there was an interesting case happening in room 702 so I headed down to the 7th floor from the 10th. In front of the courtroom there was a family waiting for the trial to begin. We engaged in a conversation which was very helpful because they were part of the trial and I got a lot of background information on the case