Organizational Changes That Effected The Group

The five stages of group/team development are: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. In the forming stage, the group members get aquainted with one another and figure out what the goals of the group are. In the storming stage, individual personalities within the group emerge and group members start to figure out what their roles will be. In the norming stage, the group begins to find unity and group members resolve their differences. In the performing stage, the group members solve problems and focus on completing their assigned task. In the adjourning stage, the group begins to disband and the members transition out and into other projects.

Providing clarity about the change can improve the transition process. According to Mclean (2011), leaders

Throughout the readings communication was identified as a vital component for establishing and maintaining relationships. Porter-O Grady sanctioned for leaders to establish firm rules of engagement to help support a positive group dynamic (2013). While Kelly & Tazbir explained that friction and conflict were a normal part of group development and were representative of the Storming stage of group process (2014). Moreover, they explained that with assistance from the team leader the team can overcome these obstacles, strengthen inter-professional relationships, and enter into the Norming stage (Kelly & Tazbir, 2014). Here the team is able to participate in the effective exchange of communication and begin making progress toward goals. This represents progression into the Performing stage of group process (Kelly & Tazbir, 2014). When the team has met its intended target they are ready to anylze the outcomes of their work and enter the final stage of group process—Adjourning (Kelly & Tazbir,

Wheelan (2013) identifies the four stages of team development and provides detailed explanation of how a group transforms itself from a stage one group of uncertainty into a successful, highly productive stage four team. This requires work and a thorough understanding of the many internal/external influences that can occur during each stage. A team member or leader who is well versed in these stages and who can evolve with each stage will be better equipped to deal with possible obstacles that can hinder group progress and implement practices to help the group successfully work through a

It was noted that communication efforts must be verbal and active (Kotter, 1995). Kotter eight step change model has many drawbacks and benefits. The advantages are that it is the step by step, which is easy to follow model. Another is that it does not focus on the change itself, but rather the acceptance and the preparation of this change, which makes it an easy transition. In Kotter’s and Lewin’s models, both consider the difficulties that organizations encounter when trying to move people from their comfort zone for the change to happen. In both of the models they use a different set of calculations to know whether there is any need to change to take place in the

In 1965, B. Tuckman published his idea of how groups assemble by using his ‘Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing model’. You could say that his theory is a helpful explanation of team development, but they may differ from one individual to another. The model does explain how the team develops its maturity, through establishing working relationships. It also connotes the leadership style changing; from a directing style, to coaching, then participating and delegating before almost being detached.

My company needs serious organizational change in two areas. First is improving our vendor payment processes. We have been having problems getting the funds to our vendors on time and sometimes paid them the wrong amounts due to our current process. This problem must be fixed for the future of our relationships with our vendors, suppliers, and contractor agencies. We must establish a change that will help repair and build the relationships and ensure the we also receive our merchandise in a timely fashion. The other area that needs to be improved is our company culture by means of employee evaluation. Currently, our employee evaluations are based on a numerical scale, measuring performance in a 1 to 5 basis. This leaves almost no room for improvement

I still remember the time I was chosen to lead the public relations team at one of the student activities back when I was in college, an experience that shaped a lot of the person I am today. I had to establish and maintain good relations with all stakeholders and media, prepare newsfeed updates for all social media platforms, and above all manage a team of 20 members. I spent a lot of time thinking that I am now donning the shoes of my seniors and becoming the person that freshers would look up to. Being an influential leader is not easy, I was sure, and it is more than just telling others what to do. In the following few lines, I employ Tuckman's stages of group development: Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing to outline my journey

In the five-stage process of group development it is in the norming stage that the group is able to control the behavior of its members. In this phase, the third phase, member start to feel as if though they belong and individual ties are made. Out of this comes a sense of direction for the group and they begin to create rules for moving forward.

Team building is centered on helping other move through different stage of a group development which helps each other strengthens their relationship within the team and other member’s to understand the roles and responsibilities required. (Bierema, L. 2014) Tuckman’s stages use the forming; storming; norming and performing model for group development. This was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965. (Bierema, L. 2014) When it comes to the current team I am linked with, we are currently not involved in any of these stages. Since this chapter, I have brought this suggestion my management so start this process. Prior to me starting in this department, current supervisors would do what they felt was correct which can contradict what the correct

As per Dr.Tuckman's hypothesis, "there are five phases of group improvement: framing, stroming, norming, performing, and dismissing. Amid these stages aggregate individuals must address a few issues and the route in which these issues are determined figures out if the group will prevail with regards to fulfilling its tasks.

The phases of group improvement are Shaping: a gathering of individuals meet up to finish a common reason. Their underlying achievement will rely on upon their commonality with each other's work style, their experience on past groups, and the lucidity of their doled out mission.

During the video, Group Work: Leading in the here and now, Part II: Transition and flight (Association for Specialists in Group Work (n.d.), there were several interactions that caused me to take notice. Furthermore, they were indications that the group had reached a transitionary stage. Corey, Corey, and Corey (2010) stated that, “this is a time in the group in which both members and leaders are learning about each other’s capacity and style for change,” (p. 181). Multiple times during the presentation, exchanges were demonstrated between group members that identified their willingness to confront, become vulnerable, as well as offer signs of resistance to what was happening within the group.

Work Team development is a dynamic and often difficult process. Most teams find themselves in a continuos state of change and development. Eventhough, most teams never reach full stability, there is a general pattern that describes how most teams evolve. There are five stages of team development, the first stage is forming. In this stage there is a great deal of uncertainty about the teams purpose, structure and leadership. Members are testing the the waters to determine what types of behaviors are acceptable. This stage is complete when members began to think of themselves as part of the team. The second stage is called storming. In this stage there is much intragroup conflict.Team members accept the existence of the team, but there is resistance to the control that the team imposes on individuality. Conflict can arise from numerous sources within the team setting but generally falls into three categories:communication, factors, structural factors and personal factors (Varney, 1989/Townsley). In addition, there is conflict over who will control the team.

Many companies emphasize a culture of continuous improvement. While never being satisfied with the status quo can drive