Despite countless criticisms on organizational development, it is important for us to understand how organizational development can help innovate and redesign an organization to perform better. Moreover, we need to address the question of whether organizational development is the best strategic approach for firms to adopt when managing organizational change. As change has the potential source of competitive advantage over competitors for company that successfully implement it. This essay will discuss the reason, characteristic and the benefit of change. Adding to that, the essay will also discuss the criticism and view on organizational development and compare it to the other approach of managing Organizational Change like the strategic …show more content…
These failures can lead to loss of market position, stakeholder relation, demotivated workforce and loss of key employees (Edmonds, 2011). According to Huczynski and Buchanan (2001), there are ten barriers to change which include; competition for resources, functional boundaries, poor communication, employee opposition, HR issue and unrealistic time table. Usually an organization’s strategic plan and daily operations clash, organizational development consultants and practitioner understand this problem and try to solve these problems by combining management development and organizational change which are sometimes seen as separate activities carried out but different individuals (Burnes, 2003). Change is both inevitable and cannot be wholly managed, it will adopt naturally once a strategy for change is already placed (Edmonds, 2011). Employee most of the time will misunderstand the meaning of change, they will have a problem doing their job if the working environment constantly changes and becoming more complicated. This can affect the organizational climate or the overall mood of the company due to the attitude and belief of the employee. Because organizational climate determine the success of organizational development, organization should include the employee and
Implementing change in an organization is complicated. It is important that a manager understands their role and responsibilities for which could very well be the success or failure of an organization. A manager should know how to handle staff resistance, and the areas that require change. There are processes that help management with assisting their staff members with adjusting to change and concentrate on the areas of importance. This process includes planning, assessment, implementation, and evaluation. The difference between a failed organization and a successful manager is when the manager has the ability to implement change with little disruption to
The work of Kanter (1992) defined organizational change as the behavior of the organization to a certain degree or another. Organizational change has strategic and structural consequences within a given organization. This is because it involves the process of dismantling as well a restructuring of the various structures within a given organization. Several problems can arise due to organizational change (Czerniawska,2005).
Positive or negative, change can be challenging to manage because employees need to be on board and be obliged to make necessary changes as well as adjust his or her work habits. When implementing change, a manager may run into numerous obstacles from resistance from the staff to morale issues. This is primarily caused by a lack of understanding by the employees and a fear of how the change will affect him or her directly. Implementing change within an organization can be extremely difficult without a manager who understands d his or her role and responsibilities. This could be the deciding factor of whether or not the
Organizational change is difficult, although necessary to support growth and excellence in the market place. The concept of change can have negative connotations among employees, especially if change implementations have not been successful in the past. This paper is going to describe the need for change, barriers to change, factors that might influence change, readiness for change, the theoretical change model that relates to the change, and resources that support change implementation.
Organizational change is not easy, but is an integral component that often allows the company and its employees to be prosperous. There are many ways to approach organizational change. Some are scientific theories like those stated in Organizational Behavior and Management (John Ivancevich) while others like John P. Kotter in “The Heart of Change,” believe it is just getting to the heart of your employees. If an organization today wants to be successful, they must understand why change is resisted and determine how to create a process to overcome this resistance
Week 3, the lecture on Managing Change describes organizational changes that occur when a company makes a shift from its current state to some preferred future state. Managing organizational change is the process of planning and implementing change in organizations in such a way as to decrease employee resistance and cost to the organization while concurrently expanding the effectiveness of the change effort. Today's business environment requires companies to undergo changes almost constantly if they are to remain competitive. Students of organizational change identify areas of change in order to analyze them. A manager trying to implement a change, no matter how small, should expect to encounter some resistance from within the organization.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss organizational change and the management of that change. I will talk about the different drivers of change, the factors a leader needs to weigh to implement change effectively, the various resistances a leader may encounter while trying to implement change, and how various leadership styles will effect the realization of change. I will also discuss the knowledge I have gained through the completion of this assignment and how I think it might affect the way I manage change in my workplace.
Introducing organisational change is often hard, the main reasons for that can be variation in perceptions of the employees, fear of disruption or failure and underlining the right approach to apply change. Then even if the change in a specific organisation is projected successfully there is still lot to be done to manage it in an appropriate way (Oakland, 2007).
The CEO of Blue Cloud Development, Shel Skinner, is troubled by the performance of his organization and seeks alternatives to the current methods of operation that may help to improve the cycle time for the release of new software products. Locating a new methodology that he believes will reduce the cycle time, Mr. Skinner hires consultants and implements the new methodology. A year into the implementation, he asks his software engineers their opinion of the new methodology, and is disenchanted when he hears that the opinion of the methodology is
The purpose of this paper is to discuss organizational change and the management of that change. I will talk about the different drivers of change, the factors a leader needs to weigh to implement change effectively, the various resistances a leader may encounter while trying to implement change, and how various leadership styles will effect the realization of change. I will also discuss the knowledge I have gained through the completion of this assignment and how I think it might affect the way I manage change in my workplace.
Organizational change is usually triggered by relevant environment shift, either internal or external, that sensed by companies and leads to intentionally generated response (French, Bell & Zawacki, 2006). This paper will discuss several organization development models..
Managing change is challenging. Understanding and incorporating change lessons can benefit leaders responsible for managing organizational change. They must recognize that change occurs regularly in business and that the greater the change impact, the higher the risk of failure. A successful change outcome occurs when leaders plan for the change, prioritize change management activities, communicate transparently, and develop a governance plan that allows for appropriate level decision making.
Over the last several years, technology has been one of the main tools that Federal Express (Fed Ex) is using to improve customer service and address the needs of stakeholders. The recent successes that company has been experiencing in these areas are causing executives to overlook certain challenges. One of the most notable has been the firm's inability to deal with issues of discrimination, harassment and employee termination. This problem has become such an issue, that the company settled several discrimination lawsuits. (Hirsch, 2007) ("Fed Ex Age Discrimination Issues," 2007) ("Prescription for Federal Express Workers," 2009)
This research purpose is specifically to argue why organizational development is beneficial for practitioners in respond to organizational change. It help organizations to understand, prioritize and use the best strategic approach for change, which is organizational development. However, there are several limitations to this research, the first one is that there are no secondary data gain inside the company. The second one is that there is no direct observation for a specific organization conducted specifically for the research, therefore the research are not fully accurate. This essay will discuss about reasons to why organizational
Most of the times change is interpreted as an action that makes improvement. Everyone needs change to overcome problems in their environment. Direct implication of change can be applied in organisation as well. Organisation change is one of the keys of a successful growth in organisation. By the definition organisational change is shift from a current state to a new different state with continuous process (Smith, 2005). The purpose of organisational change practice is to improve and develop the organisation’s effectiveness and efficiency through better management, competence, commnications, systems, and structures. Elias (2009) explains that due to the modern world influence that change in a rapid speed, organisation need to adapt in order to prevent organisation’s failure and to survive in the competitive market. There are some major environmental reasons that change organisation such as, technology innovation, and globalisation (Brodbeck, 2002). However, recently organisational change only happened in a low success rate. Low success rate of change means it is going to be hard for organisation to reach success. If company can adapt with change, it can shape the company’s objective and goals in a better way. This essay will explain the factors why the success rate of organisation is low, and discuss how organisational consultant can solve the problem and bring organisation to success.