Plagiarism : A Fine Line Between Inspiration And Plagiarism

Jonathan Allen Lethem, a modern American essayists, writes the article in which he talks about how some artists see plagiarism as a wrong doing or stealing. Lethem disagrees with those artists’ point of view. He writes, “most artists are converted to art by art itself. Finding one’s voice isn’t just an emptying and purifying oneself of the words of others but an adopting and embracing of filiations, communities, and discourses” (Lethem 87). This means that there is an inspiration behind every artist’s work. The inspiration could come from something as simple as expanding another artists’ works. It is normal for an artist to be inspired by other artists, and then invents a work of art that is similar to his/her inspiration. For instance, Lethem gives an example of how South Park, the TV show, was inspired by Rankin/Bass and Charlie Brown Christmas specials. Most of the time, plagiarism could lead to a great work of creativity.

Conflict occurs when there are opposing views with those of higher authority, the oppressor, and those beneath them, the oppressed. In “Project Classroom Makeover,” Cathy Davidson explores the struggle between the current state of the American education system and the necessity of an improved one. Correspondingly, in “The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism,” Johnathan Lethem highlights the problems individuals encounter dealing with the premises of governmental limits on intellectual property. Comparably, in “Selections from Reading Lolita in Tehran,” Azar Nafisi examines the strife between the Iranian citizens and the authoritarian Iranian regime. Overall, people create conflict with the authority of their larger social group because

Plagiarism has been seen as a harmful practice when it comes to the preservation of an artist’s originality. Jonathan Lethem demonstrates the commonality and convenience of plagiarism by composing his article “The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism” of phrases and ideas of other writers; however, he also supports the claim that a person can rethink and reinterpret the understandings of other people and create an “original” idea based off of them. Is this what Lethem truly means when he says that appropriation is acceptable, or is he supporting intellectual thievery? Appropriation is different from plagiarism in that appropriation doesn’t want the ideas of another artist to be stolen, but further elaborated on or rethought completely.

Humans love to consider that they are the only intelligent beings on earth. They hold their accomplishments in engineering and art as evidence that each human is an intelligent, complex creature, somehow more advanced than any other species on earth, and yet, supposedly unintelligent organisms, like ants, can create very complex structures that would seem to require intelligence. This concept is explored in Steven Johnson’s essay “The Myth of the Ant Queen,” where he presents the idea that intelligence is not a property of the individual, but is instead a property of groups. There are also however many examples of individuals creating things that appear to require individual intelligence. In Thomas Lethem’s

You can complete this assignment anytime between now and midnight January 29. You can find the answers to the questions in most style guides, the uploaded PowerPoint presentation, the document “Avoiding plagiarism,” and in the NLC Student Honesty Policy.

Although many schools have noted plagiarism is against their honor code or ethic code, plagiarism is being overlooked and become of very little concern in the 21st century. One of the reasons that plagiarism in getting overlooked in the education institutions is due to the inability to decipher between intentional plagiarism and unintentional plagiarism. Of course, you can send the work through electronic detection devices, but as Wendy Sutherland-Smith points out, this becomes a moral or ethical issue due to the breaches of the student's rights to the copyright over their essays. In "Pandora's Box", some teachers debated that only the suspicious ones should be sent through the site. However, what is labeled as suspicious? Sutherland-Smith

What is one major thing that can ruin your education? Plagiarism should never be the easy way out; it is the wrong way out. Plagiarism is a violation in academia. It is legal. A copyright violation falls on a copyright holder and is illegal. It can lead to being sued or even placed in federal prison. Plagiarism is more of an offence against the author while copyright is an offence against the copyright holder. (The difference) Plagiarism, copyright, trademark and patents can affect people if done anywhere from kindergarten through twelfth grade, college, and the work place. In addition, plagiarism, copyright, trademark and patents can ruin lives.

The past two weeks, I had to write a persuasive essay on how plagiarism is a big deal and how I felt about it. We also had to find at least three reliable sources to provide facts and information on plagiarism to support our side.

Ways to avoid plagiarism is by giving credit for words, paraphrases and ideas that come from another persons work. It can also be avoided by putting quotation marks around words that come form a source and then give the source. Journalist can avoid plagiarism by acknowledging material that has been borrowed and giving the readers the information needed to find the source. Another way it can be avoided is by noting an idea that was taken from someone’s work.

Plagiarism means copying or taking somebody else's work and using or saying it's your own.

Plagiarism is when someone copies a someone’s work. People don’t always try to do it. Plagiarism is also a very lazy way to finish a assignment. Plagiarism steals ideas and there are harsh laws if you do. If you do copy someone’s work, give them credit by putting the name of the article you got your information from.

Plagiarism is when someone takes words or ideas from someone or something and uses them as their own without giving credit. Someone's original ideas are intellectual property and are protected by copyright laws in the USA. Plagiarism is not just copying words or sentences, you can also plagiarize music. For example, if you were to do a cover to a copyrighted song that would be plagiarism. Also copying pictures from the internet, even Google, can count as plagiarism if you do not cite or give credit to the original author properly. This is wrong because it is a form of theft. Plagiarism is just like someone taking steroids. You took the steroids but it was not really you playing the sport, it was the enhancements. Lastly, if you go through

Plagiarism is a form of stealing someone’s ideas. It can be very bad if you do it. You can get bad punishment .Sometimes people plagiarise on accident. Luckily they won’t have to worry about being expelled only is it is just a few words. According to the article What Is Plagiarism, “ Most schools are pretty strict about plagiarism.” Many people were doing plagiarise were suspended or expelled. These are punishments and ways u can avoid plagiarism.

It can also dampen a creator’s ability to further create more content. If anyone can replicate an idea, why would anyone spend their time and creative talent to develop new materials? By plagiarizing someone, you in effect are stealing their creation.

Creatives expanding on other creator’s artwork whether it is written, designed, scored, or painted without attributing the origin of thought or concept. This can be explored by considering a multitude of cases that have plagued the creative world over this past year to include: Patrick Cariou vs Richard Prince in the United States District Courts of copyright infringement this was an extreme case in which a whole gallery of art not only violated the fair use in my opinion but managed to have a manipulation of the copyright, and in this case, but it wasn’t the case as the litigation drove forward. In this case, specifically it worked out for Prince this was not a good thing rather a technicality that helped him to find a loophole. Copyright law states that if a work is “transformative” altering the original with new expression, meaning, or message. (Dictionary.com) then it falls under fair use and in the case of Cariou and Prince 25 out of the 30 pieces were found to be in the guidelines of the fair use law and the final 5 were sent forward to a second court. Though this case had a loose adaptation of what was fair use is there are other ones that didn’t fare well for the manipulation of the art and law that protects it.