Positive And Negative Effects Of The Crusades Dbq

DBQ: Impact of the Crusades The crusades started when emperor Alexius Comnenus of the Western Byzantine Empire asked Pope Urban II from the Eastern Roman Empire for help to reconquer Asia Minor from the Seljuk Turks who were Muslims which were the Islamic Empire. On November 27, 1095 Pope Urban II made a speech for Christians to fight in the Crusades to get Jerusalem the Holy Land back. If they fought they would be forgiven for all their sins and if they died they would go to heaven. There were nine Crusades,the first crusade began in 1096 and the last crusade ended in 1291.

The crusades were multiple religious wars between the muslims and the christians. The wars were very violent and they also destroyed and ruined many things. Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative.The crusades fought violent, bloody wars that were against that christians and the muslims. Document 1 states that the crusades were bitter because of the hatred to certain religions .This is (important) because the main part of the crusades was that they all started to take back jerusalem and they were also very racist. Document 7 states that crusade kingdoms were hard to manage because the crusading knights would abuse and commit other atrocities on other christians.This is relevant because they were hard to maintain because

DBQ: Impact of the Crusades The crusades was a Holy war between the Christians and the Muslims. It started in Europe and because they wanted to free the Holy Land from Infidels. It sated in the year 1095. I think it is negative because it originally belonged to the Jews.

The crusades were a time of rough battle between the 11th and 13th century between Christians and Muslims which are two big religions now. Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative? The crusades were more negative than positive, here are the reasons why: Crusades failed their main goal of conquering the holy lands, Left a bitter legacy of hatred behind them, and both Muslims and Christians committed appalling atrocities. The crusades were more negative than positive because they failed their main goal of conquering the holy land instead ruined cities. Document 4 states that the Crusaders stormed and sacked the city of Constantinople ruining the magnificent library and stealing thousands of relics that were sold in Europe,

Examples that the Crusades were more negative are going to be stated in the following reasons.Document 1 states that “ In the middle east,both Christians and Muslims committed appalling atrocities in name of religion.”Also in Europe the crusaders sometimes turned their madness towards the Jews and massacring entire communities.This is because important because it shows that the crusades was

The Crusades was a horrific time. Many people had lost their lives, friends, even family. The Crusades were a battle over the holy land, Jerusalem. The Crusaders, people who had fought in the Crusades, were Christians. They wanted the holy land because they believe that’s where Jesus had died and rose. They had fought against the Muslims who were defending themselves against the Crusaders. The Crusades had its positive outcomes as well as its negative results. Some may wonder, were the results of the Crusades more Positive or Negative? I strongly believe the outcome was mostly negative mainly because the Crusaders didn’t win the holy land, lots of lands were destroyed, and so many people lost their lives in the battle of the Crusades.

The Crusades was a conflict between the two most popular Religions, the Muslims and Christians. There was a total of nine wars and begun during the 11th and ended in the 13th century. A question asked after centuries the Crusades have occurred is were the results a beneficial or a negative one.The aftermath of the Crusades is an obvious negative point in history. The Crusades gave many reasons on why it was failure than a success as many were killed for terrible reasons and created a bigger division and intolerance for each other's beliefs.

The crusades were a couple of wars between the christians and the muslims These wars are called The hCrusades.Do you think the crusades are more negative or more positive? Although someone might say that the crusades are more positive because you would get the holy land,it is clear that the outcome is more Negative than more Positive.

Document 5 states that, In addition to the feudal states that the crusaders set up along the Syrian and Palestinian coasts, which managed to survive for about two centuries before the Muslims reconquered them, the crusaders left in the Middle East two legacies that continue to resonate. First, the long struggle between Islam and Christendom and the example of persecution set by Christian kings and prelates (bishops) left an inheritance of deep bitterness; relations between Muslims and their Christians and Jews subjects worsened.This is interesting because wars are really serious

The crusaders were more positive because the transportation and the trade routes improved throughout Europe. Document 4 states that, the negative impact of the 2 lands,

Barbara Light said she was helping her 13-year-old daughter review for a World History test when she stumbled upon the shocking lessons. One worksheet said the “Christians’ harsh treatment of Muslims” stemmed from the Crusades and lasted until now, Fox News details.

From the eleventh and through the thirteenth century there was nine wars fought between two religions. These wars are known as the Crusades. So, where the results of the Crusades more positive or negative? I think that the results were more negative because they failed in their conquest of the Holy Land. I also think that the results were more negative because both religious groups committed atrocities in the name of their religion and after the Crusades most people don’t have religious tolerance.

There were both positive and negative effects of The Crusades, although the positives did outweigh the negatives. The two major negative effects were anti-Semitism and the orchestrated attacks by Venice. Many Crusaders in Europe were so religiously fuming, that they turned their anger towards the Jews. They would at times massacre a whole community as a result of their religious rage. During the fourth crusade, crusaders began fighting Christians instead of Muslims. After helping Venetian merchants defeat their Byzantine trade rivals in 1204, the crusaders captured and looted Constantinople. They actually ransacked the capital of the Byzantine Empire, the empire in which they began to fight for, not against. There also were many positive effects of The Crusades, one being the increase of trade. Even before the Crusades, merchants began to enjoy some of the luxury goods that were brought from the Byzantine Empire. The crusaders that

Going against modern day religious beliefs, in 1095AD the Christians went to war to claim the holy city of Jerusalem, massacring the Muslims in a bloody attempt to worship their God. Pope Urban II’s speech at Clermont inspired by claims made by the Byzantium Emperor encouraged the Christians to partake in the First Crusade in an attempt to liberate Jerusalem. The religious and economic factors were the most relevant to cause this crusade, with some influence from desired political gain and little from social factors unrelated to religion. The immediate consequences were positive for the Christians and negative for the Muslims, but the First Crusade launched an ongoing conflict between the Christians and Muslims which had positive and negative consequences for both sides. There are a number of relevant modern sources which examine the causes and consequences of the First Crusade, but, while there are many medieval sources, they do not explicitly discuss the causes and consequences of the war. In order to fully comprehend the First Crusade, it is necessary to analyse the religious, economic, and political factors, as well as the short-term, long-term, and modern consequences.

One reason why the Crusades were more negative than positive was because they worsen their own relationship with the Jews and Muslims, or religious hatred, even tho they were bad anyways. Document 5 states that ”First, the long struggle between Islam and Christendom and the example of persecution set by Christian kings and prelates (bishops) left an inheritance of deep bitterness; relations between Muslims and their Christian and Jewish subjects worsened.” (description of some of the effects of the Crusades).This is (important/interesting/relevant) because even if the Christian and Muslims relationship was bad already the Crusades made it worse by the bitterness left and even the Jews now are in it because when the Crusades lost, they took their fury against the Jews and would slaughter and destroy their cities even though the lost against the Muslims. Document 10 states that “...which one of the Franks