We live together in a world where magnetism and charisma are given much credence as against the reserved, introspective and quiet individuals. Western culture predominantly favored the extrovert ideal in every facet of the society – be it in the comforts of our home, schools, workplace and even the community we belong to. Leaders who are enchanting and gregarious are believed to be better and effective leaders compared to the ones who hold onto a calm and collected demeanor. The publication Quiet - The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain, a New York Times bestseller – is a well-thought out book with seven years of superb research. It takes into account historical facts, neuroscientific researches and case studies to describe how over a hundred years, extroversion was held in the highest esteem which has been established to be unfavorable to innovation and productivity. …show more content…
She is cognizant of the fact that the introvert nature is biologically and environmentally bent on and is, therefore, not something that needs ‘to be modified.’ Rather, she solicits support for a revolutionary approach to go beyond the traditional perspective of leadership in the personality continuum. In addition, she places an active call to welcome and aim for understanding individuals who gravitate energy from their inner world of thoughts, sentiments and impressions. In so doing, will liberate introverts to be themselves and generate positive growth in management, parenting, close connections and workforce
Throughout history, certain leaders were described as having exceptional qualities, such as charisma, that enabled them to motivate followers to achieve outstanding performances. Used wisely, it’s certainly a blessing; indulged, it can be a curse and therefore, these leaders can lead people ahead or astray. Famous leaders such as Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, and Roosevelt all shared a similar quality, charisma, which helped them rise in power and become leaders for their countries. This rise in leadership is a cause of crisis situations, distress in people, and inspirational and charismatic leaders who give promising deliverances. At the time, many leaders were struggling to rebuild their nations and as a cause, many totalitarian dictators such
Introversion is usually associated with being shy, however this association is false. Susan Cain, author of “QUIET: The Power of Introverts” explains in a Ted Talk video how introversion is the response to stimulation while shyness is the fear of social judgment. In our culture both qualities according to Susan can be shameful and discouraged, on the other hand extraversion is valued. Therefore, Susan argues that introversion should be encouraged since they bring extraordinary talents that are often kept hidden from the world. The examples provided by Susan allowed the audience insight of how introversion is discouraged in multiple settings.
“Introverts can often be very deep and very thoughtful. Even if they are quiet, they can have a lot to contribute,” explained Alcee. “In this day and age where we are all on our phones, back and forth, introverts know how to look inwards and connect. That’s something we are sort of losing as a culture and introverts do that instinctively. For millennials and this generation, that’s an important virtue and skill.”
By using a strong textual bias to empower the introvert, the impact of the book resulted in a dramatic shift in our understanding of personality. The introvert is encouraged and cultivated. However, the extrovert is not devalued whatsoever. As an introvert, Cain expected to yearn for a “world of the highly sensitive, a world in which everyone speaks softly.” (154). However, her research and her experiences only led to an overwhelming desire for balance, the harmony and mutual encouragement of introverts and extroverts. Her success can be seen in the overwhelmingly positive reception and praise of the
Many people assume that introverts are quiet individuals, and because of this characteristic it makes them less qualified to become leaders in the workplace. But contrary to popular belief, introverts are capable of being great leaders. In the workplace, introverts face the problem of being overlooked for leadership positions and those roles often go to “more qualified” extroverts. But if introverts were given a chance they would be able to prove that they can perform just as well, if not better than extroverts in leadership positions.
Susan Cain, an American writer and lecturer and an author of the renowned book “Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can`t Stop Talking”(“Susan Cain,” 2016). She argues in her book that this modern age devalues and misapprehends the proficiencies that introverts bring to the world. In addition, she believes that the best works that the world has ever seen were made by introverts. In other words, she adds on that groups or cooperates inventions are not ads on the invention. Examples of introverts that have shocked the world with their inventions are Leonardo da Vinci i.e. the world’s best artist, Steve Jobs i.e. the founder of Apple and much more.
Being an introvert in a world of extroverts, especially in leadership, is hard. Many see introversion as a bad thing and more leaders are extroverted because they are more aggressive at seizing the opportunities to lead. I find myself to have some extraverted tendencies, but at the end of the day I need to recharge after long hours of social interaction, making me an introvert. As a leader, I would excel at a job where I can have social interaction when I want it, but also have time to be alone. Typically, I avoid the spotlight and I enjoy doing
What do Albert Einstein, Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Audrey Hepburn, Clint Eastwood, JK Rowling, Bill Gates all have in common? They are all successful, all famous, and all of them introverts. Susan Cain defines introversion as such: “Introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation” (Cain ). Introverts and their opposite, extroverts, are considerably different. Extroverts are loud, talkative, tend to think out loud and are energized by socializing. Examples of extroverts include: Bill Clinton, Steve Jobs, and Muhammad Ali. Introverts are quiet, precise and well-thought out of with their word choice when speaking, and feel energized by being alone. The time that introverts ponder before they speak
Common words associated with ‘introvert’, such as shy, timid and unsocial, create a negative connotation and perception towards introverted people. In the workplace and classrooms, introverts are discriminated and neglected for leadership roles, as they are perceived to have inferior management qualities. It can therefore be difficult, to a certain extent, for introverts to be heard in a world more exclusively designed for extroverts. In her 2012 TED talk, Susan Cain urges a change in perception and more recognition for the talents and opportunities that introverts can provide to the world. This paper will explore the reasons why it can be somewhat difficult for introverts to be heard in a world full of talkers. These reasons include the introverts’
When people are asked to describe introverts, they often draw a distasteful picture. Glasses, acne, and pale skin often comes to mind. The average introvert has a bad reputation, and is undervalued in today’s society. Throughout the last century and continuing on today, people have believed in the extrovert ideal as the best type of personality. The ideal extrovert has been recognized for being confident and comfortable in the middle of action. Even when risky, he takes action, and socializes naturally in groups and teams. He prefers action to contemplation, has an easy time taking charge and is not afraid to speak to a crowd. Extroverts thrive on social interaction. On the other side of the spectrum, introverts have been looked down upon in
(Jung, 1927) Through research by Carl Jung, Gordon Allport, and Hans Eysenck contributors to either the neopsychoanalytical or trait perspective, it was discovered that introversion had a lot more to just those three characteristics. Introversion is seen in many ways, depending on the situation which is shown through many case studies. Although introversion had their disadvantages and/or limitations, the advantages that come along are much more important. Discovering that introversion is also based on genetics, environmental factors, individualization and libido was very interesting. Personally believing that this is a trait no one tends to focus on due to their lack of participation, once discovering why they act the way they do help to understand how to better get to know these individuals. Introversion should be seen as an everyday trait that people possess and should not be judged for being "withdrawn" due to their lack of contribution. Introversion is very intriguing therefore more research should be done, in order to find more
Charismatic theory can help leaders be more assertive; its behavioral quality is easier to acquire and develop easily. The way charismatic theory can help leaders lead is having charm which is the foundation of the theory, it’s Appeal is valuable for rousing others, driving a group, or showing and creating individuals, or being a trend-setter or a trust raiser. Charismatic leaders are prone to show up when the social circumstance makes individuals feel troubled. (Jacobsen & House, 2001, p. xx) This shows that charismatic leaders are adjustable towards being a leader in the workplace or a social aspect being very flexible. The Charming aspect of the this theory can have constructive outcomes on individual results (e.g., inspiration and self-regard, eagerness to go past desires and participate in organizational work (Campbell, Ward, Sonnenfeld, & Agle, 2008, p. 556-568). This theory can help leaders be more approachable and create an environment where both leaders and followers succeed in the work place or the social side.
Contemporary educational systems derived from the late 19th century advocate learning practices and environments that support the success of extroverted students, while disregarding the significance of the independent learning proficiencies and methods of introverted students.
In this text John is an introvert, we were was being persuaded that John is reflective, focused, shy, and tends to be envious of those engaging in dynamic dialog. The author describes John as being at a different place and time with a different mental attitude (Carnegie, D., D., 1981). John is pictured as a non-collaborative employee, which gets his energy by isolation and not that of being in social settings. This second impression leaves us to surmise this was John before his gain in confidence, or that he was ill on this particular day.
As a leader, one would be expected to work well with others and establish trust and credulity within their team to accomplish a task. In the business environment presented in Quiet, the Harvard Business School believes that, “… leaders should be vocal…” (Cain 50). By being outspoken their peers would, “… direct their attention to him [or her] … [and] become increasingly powerful” (Cain 51). In a modern-day business environment filled with deadlines for important tasks the importance of everyone being on the same page is higher than ever. Due to this it is very crucial for a leader to be able to manage their coworkers effectively. As stated in Quiet, with an extroverted personality a leader would be able to gain the trust of his or her peers and be able to better accomplish their job. Similarly, in an army environment, extroverted qualities are very beneficial to a