Psychological Testing And Employee Selection

5. In conclusion, this started out being a confusing but interesting assignment; however, after completing the assignment I found that the test became easier to read and understand. Also, after researching and reviewing the various types of test it brought more incite to which test a Human Resource Manager might need to use according to the jobs and the hiring needs. I also realized that many of the tests are not given necessarily to weed out a candidate, or a certain type of candidate, but instead the test makes it easier to help fit the right person for the right job.

As a human resources manager, the primary task is to ensure that only the best candidates are called for interview. In essence, academic credentials are not enough to determine a candidate’s suitability. During the interview, it is important to ensure that the applicant has required skills to meet the firm’s objectives. For example, a given person might have the best academic qualifications as per the job’s description but lack other important aspects such as ability to work in the team and good communication skills. During the interview, such traits should be noted to disqualify applicants who cannot meet fundamental requirements of a team player.

For many years, company recruiters and hiring managers had the same tools at their disposal to locate and evaluate job applicants. Finding the right person for a job often was and still is a lengthy and costly process. The payout for selecting the best candidate can be significant, and hiring the wrong person can be costly, yet often mistakes are hard to avoid. The wrong

Recruitment and selection tests “aim to provide a potential employer with an insight into how well you work with other people, how well you handle stress, and whether you will be able to cope with the intellectual demands of the job” (Psychometric Success, 2013). These tests are split into personality tests and aptitude/ability test. LL would benefit from personality tests for all employees to ensure

According to Wright et al (2011) recruitment and selection are part of the human resource practices common within organizations in an effort to develop human capital, which is necessary for better production. Numerous scholars have discussed the issue in different contexts. Pramila (2010) discussed the issue of recruitment and selection in an Indian- based company. The article presents effective recruitment practices, which are valuable for organizations. Among the identified practices include internal recruitment, interviews, personality tests, employer references, succession planning, and newspaper recruitment. According to Najafi (2011) the most important aim is to achieve an improvement in their recruitment and selection. With information provided in this article, the researcher is able to advance a thorough understanding of the different issues on improving recruitment and selection processes within organizations.

In the growing and competing business world today, it solely reflects on the HR manager to practice the best strategies in the recruitment and selection process while recruiting the best among the vast talent that is available. The HR Manager’s decision in selecting the right candidate is essential in the development of an effective workforce leading successful organisations. A successful employment relationship builds excellent talents and a perfect organisation (Salamon 1998:3).

The goal of selection programs are to capitalize on individual differences in order to select the applicants who possess the greatest amount of particular characteristics that have been assess to be the most important for job success (Cascio & Aquinis, 2011). This goal can be met by utilizing a classical approach to personnel selection. The classical approach to personnel selection starts with the job analysis. From the job analysis sensitive, relevant and reliable criteria are selected on a basis of importance to describe the job specifications that represent knowledge, skills, abilities and other characteristics (KSAOs) that potential applicants are desired to have for the job (Cascio & Aquinis, 2011).

The advantages of relying on tests or assessments to select the best job candidate is highly dependent of whether or not the assessment measures the most influential business outcomes for the company doing the hiring. It is important to remember that evaluating candidates is not the primary goal when using assessments. Improving performance outcomes of employees is the ultimate goal of choosing and using the most effective assessment. Companies are in business to increase their bottom line. Learning about their potential employees and

as the only way to access whether a person is suitable for the job is

Selecting the right employee to fill a position is one of the most challenging decision making processes a company has to make. The ultimate goal of employee selection is to hire the candidate who is most compatible not only with the organization but for the position that they are trying to fill. In order for the candidate to be successful in a particular position, their talents and personal goals must be taken into consideration and objectives need to be utilized in order to retain qualified individuals. The most common forms of selection methods are resumes and applications but testing, interviews, reference checks, honesty tests, medical exam and drug

The recruitment literature according to Breaugh and Starke (JoM, 2000) had been bombarded by criticisms for the lack of substantiated research materials and unanswered questions. The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology by Guion 1976, devoted one chapter only about recruitment process despite the numerous studies published during 1976. There were questions circulating in the recruitment literature which failed to address the key factors

Selection is a key responsibility for all manager and supervisors involved, rather directly or indirectly, in the hiring process of an organization. Selecting and hiring the wrong candidate can become costly to an organization. Therefore, the selection process should be handled with tedious care and precision to ensure to hire the employees right for the job. Potential candidates should be hired based on their skills, and knowledge relevant to the job. For instance, to ensure suitable hiring for vacant positions, the job description should meticulously be designed to properly reveal the skills necessary and required to perform the job specifically. Using a data-driven selection or hiring approach helps in increasing or enhancing the suitability of the hiring decisions made in companies or organizations. When the selection is based on the data obtained, it ensures that the success rate will be high because the potential candidate has been selected based on precise data, resulting in the likelihood of high performance. However, following a data-driven approach a company’s focus is on the required and mandatory skills and competencies required to perform a particular job.

For many years companies have depended on three basic tools, such as résumés, interviews and references to gather qualified candidates. These sources are commonly used in a day to day basis but have proven to be inadequate for consistently selecting good employees. When it comes to hiring and selecting you want to use productive tools to help determine the best decision possible. Using the incorrect tools to hire and test potential candidates causes employee turnover and retention. Companies need to understand what pre-employment assessments are and why they are effective. I will be discussing the best means of hiring and testing new employees. Exploring what other companies are doing in hiring and testing, accessing the positives and negatives of each, and lastly offering recommendations to our department.

The recruitment and selection process refers to where organisations use various methods in order to generate a pool of candidates that are suited to the job at hand and align with the organisations goals. With technology being used and relied on by many in the business world, it is important that organisations stay relevant by implementing both web-based applications methods and scientific tests to attract the best possible people for the job. These both have their benefits and negatives when used in the recruitment and selection process, but with some modifications, they would further aid organisations to attract the best possible employees to fit into the job.

Many organizations depend only on the result of the test without taking the reliability and validity into considerations, which that might lead to in hiring the wrong people. What is the difference between reliability and validity? “Reliability is the consistency and the stability of a selection measurement and validity is the degree to which a measure predicts on-the-job performance” (Green, 2003). For instance, the consistency of a test is made for to measure reliability and what kind of method to use to test the candidate is to measure validity. Since reliability and validity are both important aspects in the selection process, let’s look at several methods that are used in today’s industries.